- Thread starter
- #161
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Warhead:Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
Warhead:Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
It has a massive metal body and won´t be destroyed, not even damaged necessarily.Warhead:Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
This is where ou got the shots from. Had the warhead been shot down, it would have been in real bad shape hitting the ground at 550 mph. Your pictures are fake.
https://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/ORD_BGM-109_Tomahawk_Block_IV_Cutaway_lg.gif
It has a massive metal body and won´t be destroyed, not even damaged necessarily.Warhead:Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
This is where ou got the shots from. Had the warhead been shot down, it would have been in real bad shape hitting the ground at 550 mph. Your pictures are fake.
https://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/ORD_BGM-109_Tomahawk_Block_IV_Cutaway_lg.gif
WWII bomb:
In other words, you can't come up with a reason that there were no pictures of downed cruise missiles in urban areas where many people have cell phones. You just suppress this obvious flaw in your reasoning to carry on looking like a complete moron.Haha, you sucked up brain! In the night, shithead. And so many targets. Always fun to see you invincible, arrogant bastards struggling to make points. Look up this thread, how many believe you?
Clearly. I'm sure all the folks working here will report tomorrow to continue on, after all some gullible idiot on an internet forum has pointed out the missiles failed.Anyway, your President lied, his missiles failed
Yep, there are examples of planes hit by large SAMs and it's absolutely nothing like the picture that the Village Idiot posted. For example, Malaysia Airlines Flt 17 over Ukraine:Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out
lol here's the 100% effective Pantsir in action...Pantsir systems operated by the Syrian military showed almost 100 % effectiveness:
Syrian missiles strike Zionist aggressors in the Golan Heightslol here's the 100% effective Pantsir in action...Pantsir systems operated by the Syrian military showed almost 100 % effectiveness:
Israeli Air Force on Twitter
That's pretty funny, you're so shallow-minded you think proving something else validates something you said that was proven false.
Your expertise continues to shine...Pantsir systems operated by the Syrian military showed almost 100 % effectiveness
Your expertise continues to shine...Pantsir systems operated by the Syrian military showed almost 100 % effectiveness
Russia looking for replacement for “troubled” Pantsir air defense system – Defence Blog
The Russian Armed Forces are looking more advanced and cost-effectivity air defense system to replace “troubled” Pantsir (SA-22 according to the NATO designation) anti-aircraft defense system. According to sources in the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the Russian Army and Navy are dissatisfied with Pantsir complex and looking on absolute new air defense systems. For the army, the Pantsir air defense system proved too heavy, complex and not effective to protect against most of the potential threats. To protect the ships in the coastal zone and in harbors, the naval version of Pantsir has also become too expensive and not very effective.
Pantsir is a medium-range surface-to-air missile and anti-aircraft artillery weapon system that has combined missiles and guns. But during a real operation in Syria was revealed a number of technical flaws of Pantsir system that designed to provide point air defense of military and industrial installations against aircraft, helicopters, precision munitions, cruise missiles and UAVs and to provide additional protection to air defense units from enemy air attacks employing precision munitions especially at the low to extremely low ranges.
What’s more, Pantsir-S1 missile defense system took a direct hit during an Israeli airstrike in Syria. On 21 January, the Israeli military says it has hit Iranian and Syrian targets around Damascus, including advanced Pantsir-S1 air defense system. “During our strike, dozens of Syrian surface-to-air missiles were launched, despite clear warnings to avoid such fire. In response, we also targeted several of the Syrian Armed Forces’ aerial defense batteries,” the military statement said.
Also, Israeli military released footage showing the several Russian-made Pantsir-S1 (SA-22 according to the NATO designation) missile defense systems took a direct hit during an Israeli airstrike in Syria.This is not the first case when the Israeli Air Force destroys the Pantsir-S1 system with impunity. On May 10, 2018, Israeli fighter jets struck several military targets in Syria, including Russian-built Pantsir-S1system. Radar of the air defense system can’t keep up with acquisition and tracking of small size targets, like as drones and precision munitions. During the defense of the Russian military base in the province of Latakia, most enemy targets were shot down with cannon weapons, which does not guarantee protection against high-speed attacks and creates a threat of concomitant destruction.
Currently, attempts are being made to develop for Russian Air Force new advanced version, called the Pantsir-SM, with latest electronics, radar, and new missiles. A new project is being funded by selling the existing version of “troubled” air defense systems abroad at a low price.
It doesn't get much funnier than the system Bleipriester claims is almost 100% effective taking a shot on the nose:
I think it was named "Bleipriester says Pantsir is invincible while Israel bombs it and Russia looks to replace it because it sucks"You know that this device was not manned.
So to be clear, you're the guy who said Pantsir had almost 100% effectiveness, and are now accusing me of bullshitting because I mocked your attempt at distraction?You are just bullshitting, no serious discussion possible.