Damascus residents enjoy fireworks, thank Trump

Daryl Hunt
DrainBamage
eagle1462010

DbnvM4mWAAM7mOp.jpg


DbnvOo3W0AAQ-P1.jpg


DbnvQNNXcAEgD5l.jpg


DbnvRhRWAAEFszv.jpg


comment_Jyx31keSSPAKbIc45Nsnv6udJT5lLObp.jpg
 
Hah hah you have an amazing ability to suspend disbelief.

They had all this time to take pictures of dozens "shot down" missiles everywhere to easily prove that they didn't even reach their targets, but naaaaaah they wanted to wait a long time gather them up then put them in some room where nobody knows whether they came from the rubble of the target sites or not. Never mind that shot down tomahawks usually draw crowds of people who have cell phones and their are supposed to be dozens of them sprinkled about a heavily populated city, nah it's all gathered together here.

I have a bridge to sell you, sucker.
 
Haha, you sucked up brain! In the night, shithead. And so many targets. Always fun to see you invincible, arrogant bastards struggling to make points. Look up this thread, how many believe you? Anyway, your President lied, his missiles failed.
 
Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
 
Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
Warhead:
31277667_1696396087108433_4492690397553754112_o.jpg
 
Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
Warhead:
31277667_1696396087108433_4492690397553754112_o.jpg

This is where ou got the shots from. Had the warhead been shot down, it would have been in real bad shape hitting the ground at 550 mph. Your pictures are fake.

https://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/ORD_BGM-109_Tomahawk_Block_IV_Cutaway_lg.gif
ORD_BGM-109_Tomahawk_Block_IV_Cutaway_lg.gif
 
Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
Warhead:
31277667_1696396087108433_4492690397553754112_o.jpg

This is where ou got the shots from. Had the warhead been shot down, it would have been in real bad shape hitting the ground at 550 mph. Your pictures are fake.

https://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/ORD_BGM-109_Tomahawk_Block_IV_Cutaway_lg.gif
ORD_BGM-109_Tomahawk_Block_IV_Cutaway_lg.gif
It has a massive metal body and won´t be destroyed, not even damaged necessarily.

WWII bomb:
onlineImage.jpg
 
Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out. Your pics are from the aftermath of the missiles AFTER they detonated the warhead. And it looks like your pics were gathered from many parts of many different missiles. Tells me that there were a lot of successful hits on target. Thank you for the confirmation.
Warhead:
31277667_1696396087108433_4492690397553754112_o.jpg

This is where ou got the shots from. Had the warhead been shot down, it would have been in real bad shape hitting the ground at 550 mph. Your pictures are fake.

https://media.defenceindustrydaily.com/images/ORD_BGM-109_Tomahawk_Block_IV_Cutaway_lg.gif
ORD_BGM-109_Tomahawk_Block_IV_Cutaway_lg.gif
It has a massive metal body and won´t be destroyed, not even damaged necessarily.

WWII bomb:
onlineImage.jpg

Give it up. You blew it posting graphics from other sites. Your graphics are faked.
 
Haha, you sucked up brain! In the night, shithead. And so many targets. Always fun to see you invincible, arrogant bastards struggling to make points. Look up this thread, how many believe you?
In other words, you can't come up with a reason that there were no pictures of downed cruise missiles in urban areas where many people have cell phones. You just suppress this obvious flaw in your reasoning to carry on looking like a complete moron.

Anyway, your President lied, his missiles failed
Clearly. I'm sure all the folks working here will report tomorrow to continue on, after all some gullible idiot on an internet forum has pointed out the missiles failed.

image.jpg
 
Ive seen what a hit from a SAM looks like and the pics you presented don't look anything like one would expect. There wouldn't be a few holes. It would be a lot of small holes from the rods they shoot out
Yep, there are examples of planes hit by large SAMs and it's absolutely nothing like the picture that the Village Idiot posted. For example, Malaysia Airlines Flt 17 over Ukraine:

malaysia-airlines-ukraine-crash8.jpg
 
comment_Jyx31keSSPAKbIc45Nsnv6udJT5lLObp.jpg

You could caption this:

"Hah hah hah my country has been torn apart by a Civil War, my economy has been crippled by economic sanctions, my currency has collapsed, my cities are in ruins, and I'm owned by the Russians. Happy Day!"
 
That's pretty funny, you're so shallow-minded you think proving something else validates something you said that was proven false.

What kind of moron thinks Syrian missiles striking something in the Golan Heights back up their ridiculous "100% effective" claim for a SAM system in Syria? Answer = the village idiot of this forum (and I suspect many more across the internet) BluePeter! Go team!
 
Pantsir systems operated by the Syrian military showed almost 100 % effectiveness
Your expertise continues to shine...

Russia looking for replacement for “troubled” Pantsir air defense system – Defence Blog
The Russian Armed Forces are looking more advanced and cost-effectivity air defense system to replace “troubled” Pantsir (SA-22 according to the NATO designation) anti-aircraft defense system. According to sources in the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the Russian Army and Navy are dissatisfied with Pantsir complex and looking on absolute new air defense systems. For the army, the Pantsir air defense system proved too heavy, complex and not effective to protect against most of the potential threats. To protect the ships in the coastal zone and in harbors, the naval version of Pantsir has also become too expensive and not very effective.

Pantsir is a medium-range surface-to-air missile and anti-aircraft artillery weapon system that has combined missiles and guns. But during a real operation in Syria was revealed a number of technical flaws of Pantsir system that designed to provide point air defense of military and industrial installations against aircraft, helicopters, precision munitions, cruise missiles and UAVs and to provide additional protection to air defense units from enemy air attacks employing precision munitions especially at the low to extremely low ranges.

What’s more, Pantsir-S1 missile defense system took a direct hit during an Israeli airstrike in Syria. On 21 January, the Israeli military says it has hit Iranian and Syrian targets around Damascus, including advanced Pantsir-S1 air defense system. “During our strike, dozens of Syrian surface-to-air missiles were launched, despite clear warnings to avoid such fire. In response, we also targeted several of the Syrian Armed Forces’ aerial defense batteries,” the military statement said.

Also, Israeli military released footage showing the several Russian-made Pantsir-S1 (SA-22 according to the NATO designation) missile defense systems took a direct hit during an Israeli airstrike in Syria.This is not the first case when the Israeli Air Force destroys the Pantsir-S1 system with impunity. On May 10, 2018, Israeli fighter jets struck several military targets in Syria, including Russian-built Pantsir-S1system. Radar of the air defense system can’t keep up with acquisition and tracking of small size targets, like as drones and precision munitions. During the defense of the Russian military base in the province of Latakia, most enemy targets were shot down with cannon weapons, which does not guarantee protection against high-speed attacks and creates a threat of concomitant destruction.

Currently, attempts are being made to develop for Russian Air Force new advanced version, called the Pantsir-SM, with latest electronics, radar, and new missiles. A new project is being funded by selling the existing version of “troubled” air defense systems abroad at a low price.



It doesn't get much funnier than the system Bleipriester claims is almost 100% effective taking a shot on the nose:

 
Pantsir systems operated by the Syrian military showed almost 100 % effectiveness
Your expertise continues to shine...

Russia looking for replacement for “troubled” Pantsir air defense system – Defence Blog
The Russian Armed Forces are looking more advanced and cost-effectivity air defense system to replace “troubled” Pantsir (SA-22 according to the NATO designation) anti-aircraft defense system. According to sources in the Ministry of Defence of the Russian Federation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, the Russian Army and Navy are dissatisfied with Pantsir complex and looking on absolute new air defense systems. For the army, the Pantsir air defense system proved too heavy, complex and not effective to protect against most of the potential threats. To protect the ships in the coastal zone and in harbors, the naval version of Pantsir has also become too expensive and not very effective.

Pantsir is a medium-range surface-to-air missile and anti-aircraft artillery weapon system that has combined missiles and guns. But during a real operation in Syria was revealed a number of technical flaws of Pantsir system that designed to provide point air defense of military and industrial installations against aircraft, helicopters, precision munitions, cruise missiles and UAVs and to provide additional protection to air defense units from enemy air attacks employing precision munitions especially at the low to extremely low ranges.

What’s more, Pantsir-S1 missile defense system took a direct hit during an Israeli airstrike in Syria. On 21 January, the Israeli military says it has hit Iranian and Syrian targets around Damascus, including advanced Pantsir-S1 air defense system. “During our strike, dozens of Syrian surface-to-air missiles were launched, despite clear warnings to avoid such fire. In response, we also targeted several of the Syrian Armed Forces’ aerial defense batteries,” the military statement said.

Also, Israeli military released footage showing the several Russian-made Pantsir-S1 (SA-22 according to the NATO designation) missile defense systems took a direct hit during an Israeli airstrike in Syria.This is not the first case when the Israeli Air Force destroys the Pantsir-S1 system with impunity. On May 10, 2018, Israeli fighter jets struck several military targets in Syria, including Russian-built Pantsir-S1system. Radar of the air defense system can’t keep up with acquisition and tracking of small size targets, like as drones and precision munitions. During the defense of the Russian military base in the province of Latakia, most enemy targets were shot down with cannon weapons, which does not guarantee protection against high-speed attacks and creates a threat of concomitant destruction.

Currently, attempts are being made to develop for Russian Air Force new advanced version, called the Pantsir-SM, with latest electronics, radar, and new missiles. A new project is being funded by selling the existing version of “troubled” air defense systems abroad at a low price.



It doesn't get much funnier than the system Bleipriester claims is almost 100% effective taking a shot on the nose:


You know that this device was not manned.

 
You know that this device was not manned.
I think it was named "Bleipriester says Pantsir is invincible while Israel bombs it and Russia looks to replace it because it sucks"

Have you ever been right about anything on this forum, ever?
 
You are just bullshitting, no serious discussion possible.
So to be clear, you're the guy who said Pantsir had almost 100% effectiveness, and are now accusing me of bullshitting because I mocked your attempt at distraction?

Let's hear it then, is Pantsir almost 100% effective as you claim? Yes or No?
 

Forum List

Back
Top