Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hungover darling?ALL of that you posted and Comey said, IS WHAT I HAVE EXPLAINED to you .....
Sure....because Comey said so, though the current state dept argued over it for a year with the FBI, saying it was NOT clasified and should be downgraded......because IT WAS PUBLIC information....but the Intelligence community won the argument against the State dept. And it was kept in secret status.Hungover darling?ALL of that you posted and Comey said, IS WHAT I HAVE EXPLAINED to you .....
As for classified information, have you ever worked with classified material? Do you understand the different sources of such material or how it can be classified? Do you think, as Comey does, that Hillary mishandled classified material? That she should have known it was classified when she was discussing it on the email chain?
NOPE!YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....No, the email address from the govt was for UNCLASSIFIED emails....state.gov .....She chose her server instead of the State unclassified email to receive non CLASSIFIED emails or lowest level of classified material..... She did not set up her server for top SECRET stuff.....for one, she couldn't.....there is no way to email from the top SECRET server....and 2, this email server of hers was a replacement to using the State.gov email system, which is designated by our Gvt as an Unclassified server, for daily duties.Are you saying she activated her government email address?You do know that Clinton used the gov secure system to communicate about classified material right? Her private server was intended for personal and non classified communications. She never should have muddied the water by mixing personal and business as we learned a few slipped through the cracks
The government set up a secure fax, in her home for her to receive CLASSIFIED info, and that is how she got higher classified material and the highest top SECRET she got while in the state dept in special rooms....never ever in email....or the secure fax.
That's not what Comey testified to. He stated to Congress that she did have classified emails on her server.
Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...
At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.
So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....
There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....
She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....
Hillary never did that...
What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.
I think it's hilarious that the same person lampooning Clinton for her handling of classified materials is nominating the guy that lost his job over classified materials, and that his supporters who were calling for Clinton to be locked up are supporting Petraeus coming back. No hypocrisy there at all. Nope. None.
It's kind of funny when I listen to these people complain about the mysterious deleted emails. I wonder if they realize that emails go two ways. If there were classified or even work related emails sent to her and she deleted them, there is still record of the messages on the senders server. All they need to do is check the records of CIA, FBI, DHS, State Dept etc for emails sent to clinton then cross reference the emails that she turned over. It isnt rocket science. Months of investigation by the FBI and they turned up careless activity but not criminal action. Why can't that be accepted?NOPE!YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....No, the email address from the govt was for UNCLASSIFIED emails....state.gov .....She chose her server instead of the State unclassified email to receive non CLASSIFIED emails or lowest level of classified material..... She did not set up her server for top SECRET stuff.....for one, she couldn't.....there is no way to email from the top SECRET server....and 2, this email server of hers was a replacement to using the State.gov email system, which is designated by our Gvt as an Unclassified server, for daily duties.Are you saying she activated her government email address?
The government set up a secure fax, in her home for her to receive CLASSIFIED info, and that is how she got higher classified material and the highest top SECRET she got while in the state dept in special rooms....never ever in email....or the secure fax.
That's not what Comey testified to. He stated to Congress that she did have classified emails on her server.
Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...
At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.
So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....
There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....
She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....
Hillary never did that...
What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.
LOLTranslation: Fuck you, DW. You're right there is a debate about Petraeus, but fuck you anyway.LOL This reminds me of the famous Groucho (or Chico) Marx quote "who are you going to trust, me or your lying eyes?"I didn't say that ,dope.
There really is no debate. You're just too partisan to see that Petraeus is damaged goods in the exact same way that Trump characterized Clinton as.
There is no debate about Petraeus, dope.
Thanks for both the backpedal and the name-calling. It' helps me to assess your IQ, education and ability to debate like an adult....or not.
There is no backpedal,dope.
It's written in plain language. At no point do I reference you.
You're a dope for making an issue out of nothing.
What is DW?
There really is no debate. You're just too partisan to see that Petraeus is damaged goods in the exact same way that Trump characterized Clinton as.
Wow, what was your score on the ASVAB? The minimum?
LIke all FBI agents, Comey is like an Angel Of God for most people.Sure....because Comey said so, though the current state dept argued over it for a year with the FBI, saying it was NOT clasified and should be downgraded......because IT WAS PUBLIC information....but the Intelligence community won the argument against the State dept. And it was kept in secret status.Hungover darling?ALL of that you posted and Comey said, IS WHAT I HAVE EXPLAINED to you .....
As for classified information, have you ever worked with classified material? Do you understand the different sources of such material or how it can be classified? Do you think, as Comey does, that Hillary mishandled classified material? That she should have known it was classified when she was discussing it on the email chain?
Comey said he FOUND NO EVIDENCE of any crimes by Hillary -- only gross negligence.One did it knowingly and with the intent of doing so and was convicted.
Comey said very clearly that Clinton did not commit a crime.
The two cases are in no way similar.
Don't leave out the fact that Petraeus lied by denying all charges before eventually pleading guilty for reduced misdemeanor chargesComey said he FOUND NO EVIDENCE of any crimes by Hillary -- only gross negligence.One did it knowingly and with the intent of doing so and was convicted.
Comey said very clearly that Clinton did not commit a crime.
The two cases are in no way similar.
Fair enough.
Petraeus on the other hand confessed mea culpa.
no, he never said gross negligence , not once...gross negligence is a law that is criminal if broken, he said he could find nothing criminal, that includes gross negligence....he specifically said she was extremely careless with the 7-8 email chains that had classified secret information....(107 in total back and forths of those emails)... which is LESS than gross negligence....Comey said he FOUND NO EVIDENCE of any crimes by Hillary -- only gross negligence.One did it knowingly and with the intent of doing so and was convicted.
Comey said very clearly that Clinton did not commit a crime.
The two cases are in no way similar.
Fair enough.
Petraeus on the other hand confessed mea culpa.
NOPE!YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....No, the email address from the govt was for UNCLASSIFIED emails....state.gov .....She chose her server instead of the State unclassified email to receive non CLASSIFIED emails or lowest level of classified material..... She did not set up her server for top SECRET stuff.....for one, she couldn't.....there is no way to email from the top SECRET server....and 2, this email server of hers was a replacement to using the State.gov email system, which is designated by our Gvt as an Unclassified server, for daily duties.Are you saying she activated her government email address?
The government set up a secure fax, in her home for her to receive CLASSIFIED info, and that is how she got higher classified material and the highest top SECRET she got while in the state dept in special rooms....never ever in email....or the secure fax.
That's not what Comey testified to. He stated to Congress that she did have classified emails on her server.
Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...
At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.
So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....
There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....
She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....
Hillary never did that...
What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.
She only needed to hand over the govt emails for the National archives, and so Congress could then get from the archives, any of the ones relating to Benghazi. Congress had no jurisdiction to subpoena her private emails because they never had any probable cause to do such so a judge would issue the subpoena.... that's justice, my dear.... I would expect the same protection of Privacy from the government the constitution has given us....upon myself, if in the same situation.NOPE!YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....No, the email address from the govt was for UNCLASSIFIED emails....state.gov .....She chose her server instead of the State unclassified email to receive non CLASSIFIED emails or lowest level of classified material..... She did not set up her server for top SECRET stuff.....for one, she couldn't.....there is no way to email from the top SECRET server....and 2, this email server of hers was a replacement to using the State.gov email system, which is designated by our Gvt as an Unclassified server, for daily duties.
The government set up a secure fax, in her home for her to receive CLASSIFIED info, and that is how she got higher classified material and the highest top SECRET she got while in the state dept in special rooms....never ever in email....or the secure fax.
That's not what Comey testified to. He stated to Congress that she did have classified emails on her server.
Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...
At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.
So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....
There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....
She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....
Hillary never did that...
What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.
There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.
it doesn't matter...if hypocrisy mattered then Petreaus wouldn't even be on the list of candidates....and Trump supporters will follow him off a cliff at this point so who cares about the hypocrisy of it all? None of the other hypocrisies mattered, this won't either imo!I think it would be a terrible decision and make him look like a HUGE hypocrite
NOPE!YES, she did have 7 or 8 email chains between her staff and then they forwarded them to Hillary, that were classified secret or top secret at the time they were sent to each other.... but, they were not top secret documents or anything like that...they were emails Hillary received from Syd Blumenthal, a friend of hers and it appears to be a valuable friend at that, because he was an informant... he sent all kinds of information that he felt could be important to her....and when she received these emails, she forwarded them to her aides/staffers to investigate what Syd was telling her and see if any of it can be or is true. I read that many of Syd's emails were fruitless with non-actionable information, but SOME of them would turn out to be accurate and give the State Dept information they did not know....No, the email address from the govt was for UNCLASSIFIED emails....state.gov .....She chose her server instead of the State unclassified email to receive non CLASSIFIED emails or lowest level of classified material..... She did not set up her server for top SECRET stuff.....for one, she couldn't.....there is no way to email from the top SECRET server....and 2, this email server of hers was a replacement to using the State.gov email system, which is designated by our Gvt as an Unclassified server, for daily duties.
The government set up a secure fax, in her home for her to receive CLASSIFIED info, and that is how she got higher classified material and the highest top SECRET she got while in the state dept in special rooms....never ever in email....or the secure fax.
That's not what Comey testified to. He stated to Congress that she did have classified emails on her server.
Well, the SOME of the emails that had information that her aides felt could be actionable information that they discovered, they forwarded back to Hillary to discuss what they found out, with her...
At the same time, our Intelligence community found out through their sources this SAME information that Syd had forwarded to Hillary that she was having her staffers check out. the State Dept did not know about the Intelligence community classification of this information and the intelligence community did not know about the State dept having this information.... at the time the emails were sent back to Hillary.
So YES, there was top level classified information in the 7 or 8 email chains, but it was NOT information they got from the IC or top secret server, but from a public source, syd blumenthal....
There can be an argument, that her staffers with top secret clearance investigating syd's emails, should have recognized the material was or should be classified to top secret perhaps, or for Hillary to recognize such, but she was above doing the actual classification, it should have been done by her aides before she ever got them forwarded to her, and marked properly....
She did not remove top secret classified material from it's proper place....which is how the law reads that you all claim she broke...there is no one that knows more about this case and Patraeus's case than Comey, he has all the clearance to see it all from both and has overseen each of those investigations, no one knows more than him... and Comey says what Patreaus did was MUCH WORSE than what Clinton did....AND he said there was no intent to break the law with the top secret info Hillary had, while with Patreaus committed obstruction of justice thru his intentional lies and passed on top secret documents to someone not authorized, INTENTIONALLY....
Hillary never did that...
What Hillary did do is destroy evidence while under subpoena and lied to Congress under oath multiple times. Nobody has their server bleach bitted to remove wedding invitations and yoga lessons.
What was subpoenaed, as with ALL subpoenas, was SPECIFIC gov't email record, her private emails WERE NOT subpoenaed.
There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.
That's correct and, IIRC, how the FBI found the deleted emails: on the other end. Of course not all were recovered because one has to know where the other end is and hope they didn't delete after reading.It's kind of funny when I listen to these people complain about the mysterious deleted emails. I wonder if they realize that emails go two ways. If there were classified or even work related emails sent to her and she deleted them, there is still record of the messages on the senders server. All they need to do is check the records of CIA, FBI, DHS, State Dept etc for emails sent to clinton then cross reference the emails that she turned over. It isnt rocket science. Months of investigation by the FBI and they turned up careless activity but not criminal action. Why can't that be accepted?
Like tax returns? Medical records? That sort of thing?Why would you hand over personal shit that they have no right too!? Especially to a group out to destroy you . ?
My problem with the Clintons, and many politicians and lawyers on both sides of the aisle, is their habit of running right up to the edge of the legal line then walking along it as long as it's profitable. This is, of course, completely legal, but, in the minds of many Americans including myself, completely unethical. Hence why her favorability rating is often in the "deplorable" range.There is no proof of what she deleted. She should have just handed over all records and let them sort it out. If that was too personal, too bad. She shouldn't have mixed business and pleasure.
