Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
JoeB is vehemently against the 2nd amendment.
Lie.
Biden Confirms Support for Second Amendment, Says He Owns Two Shotguns - ABC News
Biden: "There Is A Second Amendment. The President And I Support The Second Amendment" | RealClearPolitics
If you want to find people who are against the Constitution, read rw's on the subject of religion, abortion and marriage equality.
JoeB on this this board you blithering idiot. and I don't believe for a second when a democratic politican says they support the 2nd amendment. considering the laws they propose only screw over law abiding gun owners, they deserve nothing but scorn.
So, tell me Luddly, should businesses be forced to service homosexuals? Would that fall under, as you put it, .. "Left it to the individuals involved." ? Or does that go against your hypocritical philosophy?
So, tell me Luddly, should businesses be forced to service homosexuals? Would that fall under, as you put it, .. "Left it to the individuals involved." ? Or does that go against your hypocritical philosophy?
If you had read my comments in that thread, you would know that I wrote that businesses should be able to refuse service.
OTOH, used to be, racists assholes could refuse to sell homes to blacks/Hispanics/other minorities, employers could refuse a job based on religion or age. These days, govt is still in our private lives and its jerks like you who are in favor of that.
Stop cherry picking. The constitution is not a cafeteria where you can be against equal rights for some while demanding it for others.
I defend the right of jerks like you to spew your vomit. Same with the KKK, Westboro, etc. You have to do the same or stop pretending to be an American.
You wanna see more of your rw hypocrisy?
http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/340337-va-strikes-down-gay-marriage-ban.html
Lie.
Biden Confirms Support for Second Amendment, Says He Owns Two Shotguns - ABC News
Biden: "There Is A Second Amendment. The President And I Support The Second Amendment" | RealClearPolitics
If you want to find people who are against the Constitution, read rw's on the subject of religion, abortion and marriage equality.
JoeB on this this board you blithering idiot. and I don't believe for a second when a democratic politican says they support the 2nd amendment. considering the laws they propose only screw over law abiding gun owners, they deserve nothing but scorn.
Don't blame me because you're not clear.
This is a huge part of the reason I don't spend more time here. Reading crap from rw's like you kills brain cells.
So, tell me Luddly, should businesses be forced to service homosexuals? Would that fall under, as you put it, .. "Left it to the individuals involved." ? Or does that go against your hypocritical philosophy?
If you had read my comments in that thread, you would know that I wrote that businesses should be able to refuse service.
OTOH, used to be, racists assholes could refuse to sell homes to blacks/Hispanics/other minorities, employers could refuse a job based on religion or age. These days, govt is still in our private lives and its jerks like you who are in favor of that.
Stop cherry picking. The constitution is not a cafeteria where you can be against equal rights for some while demanding it for others.
I defend the right of jerks like you to spew your vomit. Same with the KKK, Westboro, etc. You have to do the same or stop pretending to be an American.
You wanna see more of your rw hypocrisy?
http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/340337-va-strikes-down-gay-marriage-ban.html
So, it's ok for a business to refuse to service homosexuals, but you find it OK for the government to tell a business or property owner that they must sell, loan or service someone with which they do not want to consent mutually with in such an agreement?
You're still trying to equate me to something that entirely misrepresents my positions. You will not find me in favor of laws against (or for, to be clear) gay marriage, abortion, discrimination or any other host of normal mutual consent relaated issue between individuals. You on the otherhand, continue to show you're a full blown hypocrite on the matter. in some instances government needs to force others to service others in which they may not want to, and in other instances they should be left alone as individuals. It's hard to keep all that hypocrisy straight and in which cases you like intervention by govt. and in which ones you dont.
Your hypocrisy knows no boundaries.
JoeB on this this board you blithering idiot. and I don't believe for a second when a democratic politican says they support the 2nd amendment. considering the laws they propose only screw over law abiding gun owners, they deserve nothing but scorn.
Don't blame me because you're not clear.
This is a huge part of the reason I don't spend more time here. Reading crap from rw's like you kills brain cells.
Thinking only one way is what kills brain cells, not to mention that one way ideology is what Communists and Dictators do.
Good for Ted Cruz!! ....
Your hypocrisy knows no bounds:
http://www.usmessageboard.com/pets/...e-to-attend-a-dog-cock-fight.html#post8622172
hey, [MENTION=11674]Sunni Man[/MENTION] ... You can't have it both ways.
The activity between consenting should not be controlled by the law.
Cruelty for fun and profit and done to animals (or children) who cannot consent, should be.
If you had read my comments in that thread, you would know that I wrote that businesses should be able to refuse service.
OTOH, used to be, racists assholes could refuse to sell homes to blacks/Hispanics/other minorities, employers could refuse a job based on religion or age. These days, govt is still in our private lives and its jerks like you who are in favor of that.
Stop cherry picking. The constitution is not a cafeteria where you can be against equal rights for some while demanding it for others.
I defend the right of jerks like you to spew your vomit. Same with the KKK, Westboro, etc. You have to do the same or stop pretending to be an American.
You wanna see more of your rw hypocrisy?
http://www.usmessageboard.com/current-events/340337-va-strikes-down-gay-marriage-ban.html
So, it's ok for a business to refuse to service homosexuals, but you find it OK for the government to tell a business or property owner that they must sell, loan or service someone with which they do not want to consent mutually with in such an agreement?
You're still trying to equate me to something that entirely misrepresents my positions. You will not find me in favor of laws against (or for, to be clear) gay marriage, abortion, discrimination or any other host of normal mutual consent relaated issue between individuals. You on the otherhand, continue to show you're a full blown hypocrite on the matter. in some instances government needs to force others to service others in which they may not want to, and in other instances they should be left alone as individuals. It's hard to keep all that hypocrisy straight and in which cases you like intervention by govt. and in which ones you dont.
Your hypocrisy knows no boundaries.
As I said before, if I am wrong, I take it back.
Don't blame me because you're not clear.
This is a huge part of the reason I don't spend more time here. Reading crap from rw's like you kills brain cells.
Thinking only one way is what kills brain cells, not to mention that one way ideology is what Communists and Dictators do.
And only rw's can read minds.
Right?
I don't understand why the rightyloons feel the need to discriminate against heterosexuals. Gay people should not get special treatment because they choose to poke butts. They should have to deal with the same shit as the rest of us.
Oh, cool! Yeah, that'll help jobs ... how, exactly?
The jobs ship has sailed...
-Geaux
Marriage equality is a states' rights issue as long as the state does not violate the 14th Amendment.
But I've been told the Tea Party isn't about social conservatism.
It isn't. It's about taxes. You are conflating the tea party with those individuals who are in the tea party. Just like you claim that ALL liberals aren't trying to destroy the country.
There's something a little silly about people continuing to say "it should be decided by the states" that's more than a little tone deaf. Supporters don't think it should be left up to the states unless the states decide they want to legalize it. It's like libertarians enjoy playing checkers while liberals play chess. At this point there should be a constitutional amendment stating that one man and one woman is the only marriage a state must recognize. Any other innovations are subject to the state.
Why is gay on a Republican's mind so much?
