You can't tell the difference between an innocent photo of a child's bath time and child pornography? Would any nude photos of a child constitute child porn?
I possess bath time photos of my kids when they were around 3 and 4 years old, does that make me a pedophile?
Like I said sometimes common sense has to prevail, you obviously possess none.
So, have you seen enough child porn to know the difference yourself?
Answer to your first question mark. "There's plenty of child porn "bathtime." Sometimes the child's confidence is gained slowly. (I didn't see the photos.)
To answer the text connected with your second question mark. "No."
Answer to third question mark. "Would have to see content of the photos."
You seem a little touchy via "common sense" comment. Guilt feelings, perhaps?
Yes I have seen enough child porn to know the difference. I was a juror on a case that convicted a man of child porn and I had to see literally hundreds of images (none were "bathtime" photos) that was used as evidence in the case. The photo below in one of the eight photos in question and I'd argue that most families have pictures simliar to the one provided. A rational person would look at all the photos, 144 of them, and use their common sense.
As I stated before, "bathtime" is often the innocuous springboard for more graphic photos. Sadly, you chose to post one of the photos, which further exploits these children. Have you also seen the photos of them naked together lying on a bed? And, apparently the WalMart personnel were the "rational" ones who viewed all 144 photos and came to their conclusion to call the authorities.
I stand by my original comment: WalMart did the right thing, the legal defense failed.
Last edited: