MikeK
Gold Member
That I.A.D. report followed testimony of the drug store proprietor. The cops' side of the story, which of course was impossible to positively refute because of the traumatic nature of the event, was they saw a gun, shouted a warning and opened fire defensively.Excuse me? If this is an accurate report, it seems to me there is very little question with regard to the issue of right or wrong here.
Once again, assuming this report contains all the facts, and there is nothing else about this incident we need to know, how anyone could defend something like this is beyond me.
There were two cops, one proprietor, and circumstances which are eminently capable of inducing extreme confusion. So which side of the story do you believe? Better, which side of the story do you choose to believe?