Copacetic About The Nation's Future?

[Vastator]

I am with Billy and hope the violence begins soon! I am so tired of conservative cry babies.

What a foolish thing to wish for. Especially from a side fated to lose, should things turn violent...

 

[Vastator]

Don't be.

First, take a look at the dunce Queen's New York put in the Congress, and the limelight, OcasioWhatever.

Now, look at last night's fiasco, with the Democrat establishment candidate, Katz, losing to Caban....


Caban ran on legaliziing prostitution, claiming the votes of illegal aliens and felons who are out of prison, arresting ICE workers, declining to prosecute pimps,




"... including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country...
Cabán—who has talked about decriminalizing sex work and also talked about arresting ICE agents in courtrooms—envisions an office that will not evaluate performance based on convictions but rather reduced incarceration and recidivism and increased community engagement, and that will provide updated information about sentencing policies, arrest rates and charging decisions."
Tiffany Cabán Claims Shocking Queens District Attorney Primary Win



And guess what?
"The most significant endorsement, however, likely came from Bronx and Queens Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."
Tiffany Cabán Stuns Queens Machine, Holds Solid Lead in Race for Queens District Attorney



She was endorsed by other communists, including Bernie....



Don't imagine that this sort of scum doesn't have a chance to take over the nation.

As there can be no real compromise at this point, things will eventually reach national critical mass, and one side will destroy the other.

While I feel that you are correct about things continuing to escalate; it is something we should try to avoid at all cost. Both sides have some ideas that are worth consideration. The problem being that both sides are so polarized right now, any willingness to consider the other sides proposal, is met with a reversal of opinion merely for the sake of being oppositional.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Don't be.

First, take a look at the dunce Queen's New York put in the Congress, and the limelight, OcasioWhatever.

Now, look at last night's fiasco, with the Democrat establishment candidate, Katz, losing to Caban....


Caban ran on legaliziing prostitution, claiming the votes of illegal aliens and felons who are out of prison, arresting ICE workers, declining to prosecute pimps,




"... including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country...
Cabán—who has talked about decriminalizing sex work and also talked about arresting ICE agents in courtrooms—envisions an office that will not evaluate performance based on convictions but rather reduced incarceration and recidivism and increased community engagement, and that will provide updated information about sentencing policies, arrest rates and charging decisions."
Tiffany Cabán Claims Shocking Queens District Attorney Primary Win



And guess what?
"The most significant endorsement, however, likely came from Bronx and Queens Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."
Tiffany Cabán Stuns Queens Machine, Holds Solid Lead in Race for Queens District Attorney



She was endorsed by other communists, including Bernie....



Don't imagine that this sort of scum doesn't have a chance to take over the nation.

As there can be no real compromise at this point, things will eventually reach national critical mass, and one side will destroy the other.

While I feel that you are correct about things continuing to escalate; it is something we should try to avoid at all cost. Both sides have some ideas that are worth consideration. The problem being that both sides are so polarized right now, any willingness to consider the other sides proposal, is met with a reversal of opinion merely for the sake of being oppositional.

Sooo......which of these is worth considering?


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

 

[Vastator]

Generally speaking our criminal justice system needs a massive overhaul.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Generally speaking our criminal justice system needs a massive overhaul.

I agree....we certainly need to expand it....

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Don't be.

First, take a look at the dunce Queen's New York put in the Congress, and the limelight, OcasioWhatever.

Now, look at last night's fiasco, with the Democrat establishment candidate, Katz, losing to Caban....


Caban ran on legaliziing prostitution, claiming the votes of illegal aliens and felons who are out of prison, arresting ICE workers, declining to prosecute pimps,




"... including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country...
Cabán—who has talked about decriminalizing sex work and also talked about arresting ICE agents in courtrooms—envisions an office that will not evaluate performance based on convictions but rather reduced incarceration and recidivism and increased community engagement, and that will provide updated information about sentencing policies, arrest rates and charging decisions."
Tiffany Cabán Claims Shocking Queens District Attorney Primary Win



And guess what?
"The most significant endorsement, however, likely came from Bronx and Queens Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."
Tiffany Cabán Stuns Queens Machine, Holds Solid Lead in Race for Queens District Attorney



She was endorsed by other communists, including Bernie....



Don't imagine that this sort of scum doesn't have a chance to take over the nation.

As there can be no real compromise at this point, things will eventually reach national critical mass, and one side will destroy the other.

While I feel that you are correct about things continuing to escalate; it is something we should try to avoid at all cost. Both sides have some ideas that are worth consideration. The problem being that both sides are so polarized right now, any willingness to consider the other sides proposal, is met with a reversal of opinion merely for the sake of being oppositional.

I agree escalation should be avoided if possible, but I don't see that happening. Political opposites do not attract.

I disagree that the Democrats have any ideas worth considering at this point, as I have to date not yet found one. That is not exaggeration.

 

[Vastator]

Don't be.

First, take a look at the dunce Queen's New York put in the Congress, and the limelight, OcasioWhatever.

Now, look at last night's fiasco, with the Democrat establishment candidate, Katz, losing to Caban....


Caban ran on legaliziing prostitution, claiming the votes of illegal aliens and felons who are out of prison, arresting ICE workers, declining to prosecute pimps,




"... including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country...
Cabán—who has talked about decriminalizing sex work and also talked about arresting ICE agents in courtrooms—envisions an office that will not evaluate performance based on convictions but rather reduced incarceration and recidivism and increased community engagement, and that will provide updated information about sentencing policies, arrest rates and charging decisions."
Tiffany Cabán Claims Shocking Queens District Attorney Primary Win



And guess what?
"The most significant endorsement, however, likely came from Bronx and Queens Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."
Tiffany Cabán Stuns Queens Machine, Holds Solid Lead in Race for Queens District Attorney



She was endorsed by other communists, including Bernie....



Don't imagine that this sort of scum doesn't have a chance to take over the nation.

As there can be no real compromise at this point, things will eventually reach national critical mass, and one side will destroy the other.

While I feel that you are correct about things continuing to escalate; it is something we should try to avoid at all cost. Both sides have some ideas that are worth consideration. The problem being that both sides are so polarized right now, any willingness to consider the other sides proposal, is met with a reversal of opinion merely for the sake of being oppositional.

I agree escalation should be avoided if possible, but I don't see that happening. Political opposites do not attract.

I disagree that the Democrats have any ideas worth considering at this point, as I have to date not yet found one. That is not exaggeration.

That’s where compromise comes in. None of there ideas are worth a shit, in the way they want to implement them. So add some tweaks to their ideas that have an “America first core” and give them something. And maybe get something beneficial as well. Though I agree that neither side seems willing to make any meaningful compromises. Both sides seem to have adopted an all or nothing approach that can only lead to violence.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Don't be.

First, take a look at the dunce Queen's New York put in the Congress, and the limelight, OcasioWhatever.

Now, look at last night's fiasco, with the Democrat establishment candidate, Katz, losing to Caban....


Caban ran on legaliziing prostitution, claiming the votes of illegal aliens and felons who are out of prison, arresting ICE workers, declining to prosecute pimps,




"... including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country...
Cabán—who has talked about decriminalizing sex work and also talked about arresting ICE agents in courtrooms—envisions an office that will not evaluate performance based on convictions but rather reduced incarceration and recidivism and increased community engagement, and that will provide updated information about sentencing policies, arrest rates and charging decisions."
Tiffany Cabán Claims Shocking Queens District Attorney Primary Win



And guess what?
"The most significant endorsement, however, likely came from Bronx and Queens Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."
Tiffany Cabán Stuns Queens Machine, Holds Solid Lead in Race for Queens District Attorney



She was endorsed by other communists, including Bernie....



Don't imagine that this sort of scum doesn't have a chance to take over the nation.

As there can be no real compromise at this point, things will eventually reach national critical mass, and one side will destroy the other.

While I feel that you are correct about things continuing to escalate; it is something we should try to avoid at all cost. Both sides have some ideas that are worth consideration. The problem being that both sides are so polarized right now, any willingness to consider the other sides proposal, is met with a reversal of opinion merely for the sake of being oppositional.

I agree escalation should be avoided if possible, but I don't see that happening. Political opposites do not attract.

I disagree that the Democrats have any ideas worth considering at this point, as I have to date not yet found one. That is not exaggeration.

That’s where compromise comes in. None of there ideas are worth a shit, in the way they want to implement them. So add some tweaks to their ideas that have an “America first core” and give them something. And maybe get something beneficial as well. Though I agree that neither side seems willing to make any meaningful compromises. Both sides seem to have adopted an all or nothing approach that can only lead to violence.

The Left traditionally battles incrementally. Compromise, give them a little something in spite of common sense, and six moths later they're back looking for more, until ultimately they end up with what they wanted in the first place.

Time to make an end of it. Give them nothing.

 

[Vastator]

Don't be.

First, take a look at the dunce Queen's New York put in the Congress, and the limelight, OcasioWhatever.

Now, look at last night's fiasco, with the Democrat establishment candidate, Katz, losing to Caban....


Caban ran on legaliziing prostitution, claiming the votes of illegal aliens and felons who are out of prison, arresting ICE workers, declining to prosecute pimps,




"... including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country...
Cabán—who has talked about decriminalizing sex work and also talked about arresting ICE agents in courtrooms—envisions an office that will not evaluate performance based on convictions but rather reduced incarceration and recidivism and increased community engagement, and that will provide updated information about sentencing policies, arrest rates and charging decisions."
Tiffany Cabán Claims Shocking Queens District Attorney Primary Win



And guess what?
"The most significant endorsement, however, likely came from Bronx and Queens Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."
Tiffany Cabán Stuns Queens Machine, Holds Solid Lead in Race for Queens District Attorney



She was endorsed by other communists, including Bernie....



Don't imagine that this sort of scum doesn't have a chance to take over the nation.

As there can be no real compromise at this point, things will eventually reach national critical mass, and one side will destroy the other.

While I feel that you are correct about things continuing to escalate; it is something we should try to avoid at all cost. Both sides have some ideas that are worth consideration. The problem being that both sides are so polarized right now, any willingness to consider the other sides proposal, is met with a reversal of opinion merely for the sake of being oppositional.

I agree escalation should be avoided if possible, but I don't see that happening. Political opposites do not attract.

I disagree that the Democrats have any ideas worth considering at this point, as I have to date not yet found one. That is not exaggeration.

That’s where compromise comes in. None of there ideas are worth a shit, in the way they want to implement them. So add some tweaks to their ideas that have an “America first core” and give them something. And maybe get something beneficial as well. Though I agree that neither side seems willing to make any meaningful compromises. Both sides seem to have adopted an all or nothing approach that can only lead to violence.

The Left traditionally battles incrementally. Compromise, give them a little something in spite of common sense, and six moths later they're back looking for more, until ultimately they end up with what they wanted in the first place.

Time to make an end of it. Give them nothing.

Just deny them that latter increment. Or use that desire to get even more from them. This nation has lost it ability to compromise. And that isn’t a good thing. We’re passing up a lot of opportunities to get the things we need by walking away from the table. That leaves taking by force the only option for getting what we want. I see no advantage in limiting our opportunities; especially given what the alternative is going to cost.

 

[PoliticalChic]

As there can be no real compromise at this point, things will eventually reach national critical mass, and one side will destroy the other.

While I feel that you are correct about things continuing to escalate; it is something we should try to avoid at all cost. Both sides have some ideas that are worth consideration. The problem being that both sides are so polarized right now, any willingness to consider the other sides proposal, is met with a reversal of opinion merely for the sake of being oppositional.

I agree escalation should be avoided if possible, but I don't see that happening. Political opposites do not attract.

I disagree that the Democrats have any ideas worth considering at this point, as I have to date not yet found one. That is not exaggeration.

That’s where compromise comes in. None of there ideas are worth a shit, in the way they want to implement them. So add some tweaks to their ideas that have an “America first core” and give them something. And maybe get something beneficial as well. Though I agree that neither side seems willing to make any meaningful compromises. Both sides seem to have adopted an all or nothing approach that can only lead to violence.

The Left traditionally battles incrementally. Compromise, give them a little something in spite of common sense, and six moths later they're back looking for more, until ultimately they end up with what they wanted in the first place.

Time to make an end of it. Give them nothing.

Just deny them that latter increment. Or use that desire to get even more from them. This nation has lost it ability to compromise. And that isn’t a good thing. We’re passing up a lot of opportunities to get the things we need by walking away from the table. That leaves taking by force the only option for getting what we want. I see no advantage in limiting our opportunities; especially given what the alternative is going to cost.

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

 

[Vastator]

While I feel that you are correct about things continuing to escalate; it is something we should try to avoid at all cost. Both sides have some ideas that are worth consideration. The problem being that both sides are so polarized right now, any willingness to consider the other sides proposal, is met with a reversal of opinion merely for the sake of being oppositional.

I agree escalation should be avoided if possible, but I don't see that happening. Political opposites do not attract.

I disagree that the Democrats have any ideas worth considering at this point, as I have to date not yet found one. That is not exaggeration.

That’s where compromise comes in. None of there ideas are worth a shit, in the way they want to implement them. So add some tweaks to their ideas that have an “America first core” and give them something. And maybe get something beneficial as well. Though I agree that neither side seems willing to make any meaningful compromises. Both sides seem to have adopted an all or nothing approach that can only lead to violence.

The Left traditionally battles incrementally. Compromise, give them a little something in spite of common sense, and six moths later they're back looking for more, until ultimately they end up with what they wanted in the first place.

Time to make an end of it. Give them nothing.

Just deny them that latter increment. Or use that desire to get even more from them. This nation has lost it ability to compromise. And that isn’t a good thing. We’re passing up a lot of opportunities to get the things we need by walking away from the table. That leaves taking by force the only option for getting what we want. I see no advantage in limiting our opportunities; especially given what the alternative is going to cost.

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

The list you provide is actually a set of demands. Obviously they could not be offered any of those outright. Compromise would be a willingness to make some adjustments in those areas, in return for their acceptance of some adjustments we’d like to see made. The demands presented have zero chance of going anywhere, so they really aren’t a serious concern. But dwindling as they may be in number, there are some moderate democrats out there. They just don’t get the airtime the socialist extremists do. As far as the fad of promoting these extremists goes; it will pass. After the election results soundly reject their insanity, the Democrat party will be in search of legitimate leadership that actually has a chance of making things happen. The only way they be able to make anything happen will be through compromise.
Instead making a list of demands, both sides could benefit from stating what effect, or outcome they’d like to see. Then start discussing terms which bring both sides somewhat closer to the ends theyd like to achieve.

 

[BlindBoo]

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

With people pushing lies like these daily, there is no room.

Not that offers haven't been made.

"My way or the Highway" is a founding pillar of Trumpyism.

 

[PoliticalChic]

I agree escalation should be avoided if possible, but I don't see that happening. Political opposites do not attract.

I disagree that the Democrats have any ideas worth considering at this point, as I have to date not yet found one. That is not exaggeration.

That’s where compromise comes in. None of there ideas are worth a shit, in the way they want to implement them. So add some tweaks to their ideas that have an “America first core” and give them something. And maybe get something beneficial as well. Though I agree that neither side seems willing to make any meaningful compromises. Both sides seem to have adopted an all or nothing approach that can only lead to violence.

The Left traditionally battles incrementally. Compromise, give them a little something in spite of common sense, and six moths later they're back looking for more, until ultimately they end up with what they wanted in the first place.

Time to make an end of it. Give them nothing.

Just deny them that latter increment. Or use that desire to get even more from them. This nation has lost it ability to compromise. And that isn’t a good thing. We’re passing up a lot of opportunities to get the things we need by walking away from the table. That leaves taking by force the only option for getting what we want. I see no advantage in limiting our opportunities; especially given what the alternative is going to cost.

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

The list you provide is actually a set of demands. Obviously they could not be offered any of those outright. Compromise would be a willingness to make some adjustments in those areas, in return for their acceptance of some adjustments we’d like to see made. The demands presented have zero chance of going anywhere, so they really aren’t a serious concern. But dwindling as they may be in number, there are some moderate democrats out there. They just don’t get the airtime the socialist extremists do. As far as the fad of promoting these extremists goes; it will pass. After the election results soundly reject their insanity, the Democrat party will be in search of legitimate leadership that actually has a chance of making things happen. The only way they be able to make anything happen will be through compromise.
Instead making a list of demands, both sides could benefit from stating what effect, or outcome they’d like to see. Then start discussing terms which bring both sides somewhat closer to the ends theyd like to achieve.

Since you've been given the opportunity twice,and could not provide a viable compromise in any of those areas, I'll assume your view is not amenable in reality.


Billy said the other side must be defeated.

I'm gonna go with that view.



Consider the possibility that you are incorrect.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…

With people pushing lies like these daily, there is no room.

Not that offers haven't been made.

"My way or the Highway" is a founding pillar of Trumpyism.

Liars like you always accuse the other side of lying.

It's rule #2.


Rule #2
To know what the Left is guilty of, just watch what they blame the other side of doing.




Every item in the post is a position taken by a Democrat candidate for President.


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays.




Nothing you have ever posted is as accurate as the picture of a dog as your avi.

 

[Vastator]

That’s where compromise comes in. None of there ideas are worth a shit, in the way they want to implement them. So add some tweaks to their ideas that have an “America first core” and give them something. And maybe get something beneficial as well. Though I agree that neither side seems willing to make any meaningful compromises. Both sides seem to have adopted an all or nothing approach that can only lead to violence.

The Left traditionally battles incrementally. Compromise, give them a little something in spite of common sense, and six moths later they're back looking for more, until ultimately they end up with what they wanted in the first place.

Time to make an end of it. Give them nothing.

Just deny them that latter increment. Or use that desire to get even more from them. This nation has lost it ability to compromise. And that isn’t a good thing. We’re passing up a lot of opportunities to get the things we need by walking away from the table. That leaves taking by force the only option for getting what we want. I see no advantage in limiting our opportunities; especially given what the alternative is going to cost.

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

The list you provide is actually a set of demands. Obviously they could not be offered any of those outright. Compromise would be a willingness to make some adjustments in those areas, in return for their acceptance of some adjustments we’d like to see made. The demands presented have zero chance of going anywhere, so they really aren’t a serious concern. But dwindling as they may be in number, there are some moderate democrats out there. They just don’t get the airtime the socialist extremists do. As far as the fad of promoting these extremists goes; it will pass. After the election results soundly reject their insanity, the Democrat party will be in search of legitimate leadership that actually has a chance of making things happen. The only way they be able to make anything happen will be through compromise.
Instead making a list of demands, both sides could benefit from stating what effect, or outcome they’d like to see. Then start discussing terms which bring both sides somewhat closer to the ends theyd like to achieve.

Since you've been given the opportunity twice,and could not provide a viable compromise in any of those areas, I'll assume your view is not amenable in reality.


Billy said the other side must be defeated.

I'm gonna go with that view.



Consider the possibility that you are incorrect.

Then go with that view. So... How exactly do you intend to “defeat” the other side?

 

[PoliticalChic]

The Left traditionally battles incrementally. Compromise, give them a little something in spite of common sense, and six moths later they're back looking for more, until ultimately they end up with what they wanted in the first place.

Time to make an end of it. Give them nothing.

Just deny them that latter increment. Or use that desire to get even more from them. This nation has lost it ability to compromise. And that isn’t a good thing. We’re passing up a lot of opportunities to get the things we need by walking away from the table. That leaves taking by force the only option for getting what we want. I see no advantage in limiting our opportunities; especially given what the alternative is going to cost.

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

The list you provide is actually a set of demands. Obviously they could not be offered any of those outright. Compromise would be a willingness to make some adjustments in those areas, in return for their acceptance of some adjustments we’d like to see made. The demands presented have zero chance of going anywhere, so they really aren’t a serious concern. But dwindling as they may be in number, there are some moderate democrats out there. They just don’t get the airtime the socialist extremists do. As far as the fad of promoting these extremists goes; it will pass. After the election results soundly reject their insanity, the Democrat party will be in search of legitimate leadership that actually has a chance of making things happen. The only way they be able to make anything happen will be through compromise.
Instead making a list of demands, both sides could benefit from stating what effect, or outcome they’d like to see. Then start discussing terms which bring both sides somewhat closer to the ends theyd like to achieve.

Since you've been given the opportunity twice,and could not provide a viable compromise in any of those areas, I'll assume your view is not amenable in reality.


Billy said the other side must be defeated.

I'm gonna go with that view.



Consider the possibility that you are incorrect.

Then go with that view. So... How exactly do you intend to “defeat” the other side?

At the ballot box, silly.

 

[Vastator]

Just deny them that latter increment. Or use that desire to get even more from them. This nation has lost it ability to compromise. And that isn’t a good thing. We’re passing up a lot of opportunities to get the things we need by walking away from the table. That leaves taking by force the only option for getting what we want. I see no advantage in limiting our opportunities; especially given what the alternative is going to cost.

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

The list you provide is actually a set of demands. Obviously they could not be offered any of those outright. Compromise would be a willingness to make some adjustments in those areas, in return for their acceptance of some adjustments we’d like to see made. The demands presented have zero chance of going anywhere, so they really aren’t a serious concern. But dwindling as they may be in number, there are some moderate democrats out there. They just don’t get the airtime the socialist extremists do. As far as the fad of promoting these extremists goes; it will pass. After the election results soundly reject their insanity, the Democrat party will be in search of legitimate leadership that actually has a chance of making things happen. The only way they be able to make anything happen will be through compromise.
Instead making a list of demands, both sides could benefit from stating what effect, or outcome they’d like to see. Then start discussing terms which bring both sides somewhat closer to the ends theyd like to achieve.

Since you've been given the opportunity twice,and could not provide a viable compromise in any of those areas, I'll assume your view is not amenable in reality.


Billy said the other side must be defeated.

I'm gonna go with that view.



Consider the possibility that you are incorrect.

Then go with that view. So... How exactly do you intend to “defeat” the other side?

At the ballot box, silly.

So you agree. Like I said; the demands you listed won’t be met. But then what? We still have an immigration problem. We still could benefit from reforming our criminal justice system. Merely winning tha election alone isn’t enough to achieve that. As long as gridlock persists very little changes. Which might have its benefits, but also has some very strong negatives. Not the least of which being the steady flow of invaders. They are still coming. And will continue to do so until both sides choose to agree on a solution that they’ll enforce.

 

[alang1216]

Don't be.

First, take a look at the dunce Queen's New York put in the Congress, and the limelight, OcasioWhatever.

Now, look at last night's fiasco, with the Democrat establishment candidate, Katz, losing to Caban....


Caban ran on legaliziing prostitution, claiming the votes of illegal aliens and felons who are out of prison, arresting ICE workers, declining to prosecute pimps,




"... including ending cash bail, not prosecuting subway turnstile jumping, prosecuting the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, closing Rikers Island and decriminalizing sex work marks a massive departure from the traditional tough-on-crime, prosecutorial approach of DAs around the country...
Cabán—who has talked about decriminalizing sex work and also talked about arresting ICE agents in courtrooms—envisions an office that will not evaluate performance based on convictions but rather reduced incarceration and recidivism and increased community engagement, and that will provide updated information about sentencing policies, arrest rates and charging decisions."
Tiffany Cabán Claims Shocking Queens District Attorney Primary Win



And guess what?
"The most significant endorsement, however, likely came from Bronx and Queens Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez."
Tiffany Cabán Stuns Queens Machine, Holds Solid Lead in Race for Queens District Attorney



She was endorsed by other communists, including Bernie....



Don't imagine that this sort of scum doesn't have a chance to take over the nation.

Which scares you more, that she will fail or that she will succeed?

 

[DustyInfinity]

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

The list you provide is actually a set of demands. Obviously they could not be offered any of those outright. Compromise would be a willingness to make some adjustments in those areas, in return for their acceptance of some adjustments we’d like to see made. The demands presented have zero chance of going anywhere, so they really aren’t a serious concern. But dwindling as they may be in number, there are some moderate democrats out there. They just don’t get the airtime the socialist extremists do. As far as the fad of promoting these extremists goes; it will pass. After the election results soundly reject their insanity, the Democrat party will be in search of legitimate leadership that actually has a chance of making things happen. The only way they be able to make anything happen will be through compromise.
Instead making a list of demands, both sides could benefit from stating what effect, or outcome they’d like to see. Then start discussing terms which bring both sides somewhat closer to the ends theyd like to achieve.

Since you've been given the opportunity twice,and could not provide a viable compromise in any of those areas, I'll assume your view is not amenable in reality.


Billy said the other side must be defeated.

I'm gonna go with that view.



Consider the possibility that you are incorrect.

Then go with that view. So... How exactly do you intend to “defeat” the other side?

At the ballot box, silly.

So you agree. Like I said; the demands you listed won’t be met. But then what? We still have an immigration problem. We still could benefit from reforming our criminal justice system. Merely winning tha election alone isn’t enough to achieve that. As long as gridlock persists very little changes. Which might have its benefits, but also has some very strong negatives. Not the least of which being the steady flow of invaders. They are still coming. And will continue to do so until both sides choose to agree on a solution that they’ll enforce.

In Mac's thread about compromise, it eventually got to the point where there are many things both sides can agree on, however those issues will never be worked on. The media driven, divisive issues will continue the gridlock, and common sense stuff will never be touched. The game for power will ensure that if a Republican has a chance for a common sense agreement, it will be coupled with a government power grab. They would have to agree to dangerous horseshit like eliminating Ice, eliminating the electoral college, or mega programs like medicare for all. It is best to continue the gridlock than enact those liberal demands.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Where do you envision any room for compromise ....


The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism…


....and this.....


Not just refusing to finance a wall on the southern border….but tearing down existing barriers

Abolishing ICE

Scrapping the electoral college

Eliminating all private health insurance

Packing the Supreme Court

Lowering the voting age to sixteen

Banning cars and airplanes

Financial security for those who ‘don’t care to work’

Reparations for slavery

Reparations for drug dealers

Giving murders and rapists the vote

Reparations for gays

The list you provide is actually a set of demands. Obviously they could not be offered any of those outright. Compromise would be a willingness to make some adjustments in those areas, in return for their acceptance of some adjustments we’d like to see made. The demands presented have zero chance of going anywhere, so they really aren’t a serious concern. But dwindling as they may be in number, there are some moderate democrats out there. They just don’t get the airtime the socialist extremists do. As far as the fad of promoting these extremists goes; it will pass. After the election results soundly reject their insanity, the Democrat party will be in search of legitimate leadership that actually has a chance of making things happen. The only way they be able to make anything happen will be through compromise.
Instead making a list of demands, both sides could benefit from stating what effect, or outcome they’d like to see. Then start discussing terms which bring both sides somewhat closer to the ends theyd like to achieve.

Since you've been given the opportunity twice,and could not provide a viable compromise in any of those areas, I'll assume your view is not amenable in reality.


Billy said the other side must be defeated.

I'm gonna go with that view.



Consider the possibility that you are incorrect.

Then go with that view. So... How exactly do you intend to “defeat” the other side?

At the ballot box, silly.

So you agree. Like I said; the demands you listed won’t be met. But then what? We still have an immigration problem. We still could benefit from reforming our criminal justice system. Merely winning tha election alone isn’t enough to achieve that. As long as gridlock persists very little changes. Which might have its benefits, but also has some very strong negatives. Not the least of which being the steady flow of invaders. They are still coming. And will continue to do so until both sides choose to agree on a solution that they’ll enforce.

Now don't start sounding like a moron, or a liar.

I certainly don't 'agree.'

They, the Left, the Democrats, Liberals, Progressives, must be defeated, extirpated, ground to dust politically......as I forced you to admit.....there is no basis for compromise.


Trump is reshaping the judiciary....that's were we begin.