Cool the planet, block the sunlight.

Another idea is reflective 'whitening' surfaces on the land. Lightening asphalt road paving is already being researched. The biggest opportunity is in agriculture; developing crop plants that have light colored flowers.

Of course, the greatest opportunity is in reducing individual carbon footprints. However, as this would negatively affect the economy it's not realistic.
 
Block the sunlight with photovoltaic panels and replace energy sources that contribute to global warming, waste and pollution.
I believe that is being done, on a huge scale. However, it's not keeping up with new demand for electricity.

 
It's easier and cheaper to reduce the amount of sunlight hitting the earth than to reduce greenhouse gases. We can easily put light and heat reflecting materials into the upper atmosphere. This will also have the effect of reducing the amount of co2 in the air as cooler temps reduce the natural production of co2.
Suuure.....lets make it cooler in the winter okay???
 
Block the sunlight with photovoltaic panels and replace energy sources that contribute to global warming, waste and pollution.
Do you really want to live in perpetual twilight?

What will blocking sunlight do to plant life and food crops?

It's just a dumb idea
 
Do you really want to live in perpetual twilight?

What will blocking sunlight do to plant life and food crops?

It's just a dumb idea
Grass still grows in those solar farms. We produce way too much food as it is. Agriculture is a major contributor to climate change.
 
We'll just have to figure that out. I suggest special equipment on commercial airplanes, or military aircraft that fly at the right altitude and distance. Chaff would be released at designated points.

I did already ... 1/100th of an inch requires 20 cubic miles of material ... 1/1,000th of an inch would require 2 cubic miles of material ... how many 747-fulls does it take to transport 2 cubic miles of material? ...
 
I believe that is being done, on a huge scale. However, it's not keeping up with new demand for electricity.

Solar panels placed just above the ground are not going to cool the planet. They are far more absorptive than even bare soil much less anything green. And even were they to turn a large fraction of their insolation into electricity, it will all eventually end up as heat. Thus, their failure to reflect light back into space will make things worse in that regard. Things will be much better than they would had their energy been generated from fossil fuels, but it is not perfect. Putting the panels in space and beaming the power down would be a better solution in that regard.
 
Last edited:
I did already ... 1/100th of an inch requires 20 cubic miles of material ... 1/1,000th of an inch would require 2 cubic miles of material ... how many 747-fulls does it take to transport 2 cubic miles of material? ...
Along with other programs that much is not needed. I think it should be governed by how much suitable waste paper we accumulate that cannot be recycled. And that's a lot.
 
Solar panels placed just above the ground are not going to cool the planet. They are far more absorptive than even bare soil much less anything green. And even were they to turn a large fraction of their insolation into electricity, it will all eventually end up as heat. Thus, their failure to reflect light back into space will make things worse in that regard. Things will be better than they would had their energy been generated from fossil fuels, but it is not perfect. Putting the panels in space and beaming the power down would be a better solution in that regard.
A solution to that problem has been developed. A coating that reflects much of the heat falling on the panels back into space. This also increases the efficiency of the panels to produce electricity.

 
It's easier and cheaper to reduce the amount of sunlight hitting the earth than to reduce greenhouse gases. We can easily put light and heat reflecting materials into the upper atmosphere. This will also have the effect of reducing the amount of co2 in the air as cooler temps reduce the natural production of co2.
^ Stupidest idea in human history
 

“There are multiple reasons to avoid doing this, and instead to favor reducing emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.”
 
A solution to that problem has been developed. A coating that reflects much of the heat falling on the panels back into space. This also increases the efficiency of the panels to produce electricity.
If the panels are on the ground the heat will be reflected back into the atmosphere not back into space where it will just add to the heat already trapped by GHGs
 

“There are multiple reasons to avoid doing this, and instead to favor reducing emissions of CO2 and other greenhouse gases.”
But we aren't going to do that. :(
 
If the panels are on the ground the heat will be reflected back into the atmosphere not back into space where it will just add to the heat already trapped by GHGs
Then we'd better reduce the GHG's up there.
 
Floating trash in the upper atmosphere won't do that
The 'trash' comes down in a few weeks.

It doesn't look like the problem is going solve itself. We should do something on a grand scale, as people won't help much on an individual/collective scale.
 

Forum List

Back
Top