ihopehefails
VIP Member
- Oct 3, 2009
- 3,384
- 228
- 83
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
Its far from "embracing authority"
It is simply allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that "We the people" elected them to do.
It is the subversive right wingnuts sitting on the outside pouting like chastised children who are the asswipes.
We gave eight years to embracing the doctrine of the rightwing. Two wars were started and the country was driven into a deep recession.
We the people, have spoken and driven the right wing into exile
No.
It is not far from embracing authority. It is embracing authority.
It is not even remotely "allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that 'We the people' elected them to [enact]."
I never elected anybody to violate the Constitutional limitations on what they may enact.
We, the People and the States, have every right to insist that the elected officials STOP violating the Constitution by their persistent ignoring the of the FACT that what we set up in the first place was a LIMITED Government.
You libs absolutely do embrace authority because, as Mark Levin has correctly observed, you are all Statists. And nobody is sitting around pouting that the other Party won. If that was all that there was to it, there'd be nothing to get worked up over. Instead, it is the fact that YOUR side absolutely defiles and tramples upon the Constitutional precepts of a LIMITED Government of ENUMERATED powers that makes some of us rather alarmed and angry.
And sitting around sulking would be both foolish and dangerous. There is much work to be done to throw you liberal Democrat Parody transgressors the hell out of our government. And because of your dangerous proclivities to shred Constitutional limitations, time is very much of the essence.
The duly elected government from "We the people" have not violated a single Constitutional act. Within the bounds of our great Constitution you are free to question the legality of anything that has been done by this administration. That is why we have courts. As you well know, your childish rants of unconstitutionality will not stand up in court.
Just because you were defeated by a 2:1 margin in the past Presidential election and no longer get to call the shots does not make it unconstitutional
The "we the people" that elected this monstrausity of a president only included 52% so maybe you should just add the .52 X (We the People) and remember that there are millions of other people in this country who do not agree with this man's policies.
They could hold up in court because more and more people are waking up to what the actual role of the federal government is.