Consevatives are all grouches

[Luissa]

Purple teletubby is a kid, only even younger than the Sesame Street characters.

Why do people insist on sticking labels on kids who can barely talk with sexual characteristics which they will carry the rest of their lives because they do things typically associated with the opposite sex when they're too young to make any distinction at all?

My son went through a love affair with my shoes when he was about 4 years old. He got a kick out of putting on my heels and stomping through the house. Likewise, he toyed around with wearing his sister's dresses. I can remember dressing my younger brother up as a girl (complete with wig) and he's anything but homo. Yet he was perfectly willing to be dressed up as a girl when he was a kid.

Lefterals would take that as an indication that he was queer at the age of 7 and start grooming him as one.

I see it as a natural fascination with the world around them.

My boy is 6 now and my daughter has to keep chasing him away from her Polly Pockets. He's fascinated by them. He's not fascinated by Barbie dolls, but he likes the little tiny dolls with all their little clothes and shoes and accessories. It's not because they're girls, it's because he likes the tactile part of it, it's fun to put rubber clothes on tiny things, and fiddle around with their little animals and stuff. .

actually the purple teletubbie was the only one with an adult voice and I was joking Allie. ANd you want to know who came up with calling him gay, high school kids who love to label things.

 

[AllieBaba]

All high school kids are liberal.

 

[edthecynic]

Purple teletubby is a kid, only even younger than the Sesame Street characters.

Why do people insist on sticking labels on kids who can barely talk with sexual characteristics which they will carry the rest of their lives because they do things typically associated with the opposite sex when they're too young to make any distinction at all?

My son went through a love affair with my shoes when he was about 4 years old. He got a kick out of putting on my heels and stomping through the house. Likewise, he toyed around with wearing his sister's dresses. I can remember dressing my younger brother up as a girl (complete with wig) and he's anything but homo. Yet he was perfectly willing to be dressed up as a girl when he was a kid.

Lefterals would take that as an indication that he was queer at the age of 7 and start grooming him as one.

I see it as a natural fascination with the world around them.

My boy is 6 now and my daughter has to keep chasing him away from her Polly Pockets. He's fascinated by them. He's not fascinated by Barbie dolls, but he likes the little tiny dolls with all their little clothes and shoes and accessories. It's not because they're girls, it's because he likes the tactile part of it, it's fun to put rubber clothes on tiny things, and fiddle around with their little animals and stuff. .

Article: Falwell warns of gay Teletubby: Newsletter says kids show provides damaging role model - Charleston Daily Mail | HighBeam Research - FREE trial
ROANOKE, Va. - Is Tinky Winky gay?

The Rev. Jerry Falwell suspects so, telling parents that the purple "Teletubbies" character from the popular children's television show is a homosexual role model.

Under a headline that reads "Parents Alert: Tinky Winky Comes Out of the Closet," an article in the February edition of the National Liberty Journal notes that Tinky Winky has the voice of a boy yet carries a purse. "He is purple - the gay-pride color; and his antenna is shaped like a triangle - the gay-pride symbol," the story said.

 

[AllieBaba]

My kids loved the teletubbies. Sorry, I never found the gay teletubby as threatening, nor did I view him as indoctrinating my 1 & 2 year old kids into gaydom.

My kids both loved the bag, the hats and the balls that came out of the bag.

 

[The T]

'Sesame Street' Ombudsman Says Fox News Parody 'Should Have Been Resisted' - FOXNews.com

According to this article grouches weren't happy with GNN so they turned to something "grouchier" called Pox News. Now the simularity between Pox and Fox could be chalked up to creative coincidence but wouldn't a grouch who wants to find a grouchier news network go and find one called More Grouchier News Network? That would make more sense but they chose "POX" which happens to rhyme with Fox news which attracts a lot of conservatives.

Now the implication here is that they are comparing conservatives to grouches that (like the grouches who were tired of GNN) fled CNN for something even more conservative or grouchier like Fox news.

Some might say that this is not a big deal and in many ways it is not but the fact that this appears on a children's show and on state funded television makes it a dangerous bit of state propaganda that assaults a certain political view that it does not want you to have. This could be "crazy" but when has Sesame Street ever did a similar skit involving politics or anything involving real life. Most of its show's skits revolve around the happenings and politics of the fictional world of Sesame Street and never once attempted go outside that setting yet the writers felt the need to write their viewpoint of real life politics into an influential children's skit.

We must now question the motives of the writers about why they decided to spend their time creating this. It could be just sport and but if so why not put a more likeable character into the skit such as Big Bird or the Cookie monster. They chose an unlikable character to associate conservatives with and this has an affect on the decision these children will have to make about what political beliefs they will live by when they get older. Do they want to be a grouch (conservative) or do they want to emulate one of the "cool" people (liberal) that their favorite singers claim to be.

More than likely, they will always choose to be a likable person and assume the political leanings that likable people have and that will be liberal. This is the social trap that liberals have set conservatives throughout the years. They have turned being conservative into being someone of unlikable character. They pick the worst examples of conservatives such as any who are racist (another unlikable characteristic) while hiding liberals who are equally racist.

Conservative characters in the entertainment world are portrayed as money hungry and indifferent to their fellow man and conservatives who buck this trend such as Ronald Reagan or Sarah Palin are often viciously attacked by the media by endless articles about them because after all the press Gov. Palin gets (who isn't even involved in politics) I would think she is the world itself where writers feel compelled to spend their energies on writing about one person yet neglecting other events such as the massacre in Texas (has that got as much press as Gov. Palin?).

This is why grouches complain that news isn't grouch enough so they turn to a more grouchier new network where grouch is a codeword for conservativism.

Liberoidals are all stupid douches.

Say, these generalizations are like all fun and stuff!

Sorry if the glaring stupidity in the OP failed to make me grouchy.

Actually? It's comedic relief...

 

[rightwinger]

I, for one, have had it with Sesame Street INDOCTRINATING our children!

First, they force the image that blacks, whites, asians and hispanics can live on one street and get along

Second, they put on that gay Bert and Ernie

Now they are badmouthing FOX News!

Teabaggers of America! We need to band together and drive these subversives off the air

I altered your username, above, to more honestly reflect the basis for your boring, witless and imbecilic spews.

I know honesty offends you. Tough.

As the only true, universally acknowledged rightwinger on this board, I am offended that you would deface my moniker.

By the way, John Belushi was a Liberal

 

[The T]

I, for one, have had it with Sesame Street INDOCTRINATING our children!

First, they force the image that blacks, whites, asians and hispanics can live on one street and get along

Second, they put on that gay Bert and Ernie

Now they are badmouthing FOX News!

Teabaggers of America! We need to band together and drive these subversives off the air

I altered your username, above, to more honestly reflect the basis for your boring, witless and imbecilic spews.

I know honesty offends you. Tough.

As the only true rightwinger on this board, I am offended that you would deface my moniker.

By the way, John Belushi was a Liberal

And this is pertinent how? OH! I get it! Tit for tat...pass the popcorn!

 

[Emma]

Grouch News Network, or GNN. The skit features CNN’s Anderson Cooper filling in for Oscar as he chats with “Walter Cranky” and “Dan Rather-Not,” parodies on Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather.

Apparently it was ok as long as they parodied others LOL

Good grief. The right has their panties in a wad over a 6-second phone call from a muppet.

Y'all just keep on being relevant. That's what you do best

 

[Liability]

Grouch News Network, or GNN. The skit features CNN’s Anderson Cooper filling in for Oscar as he chats with “Walter Cranky” and “Dan Rather-Not,” parodies on Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather.

Apparently it was ok as long as they parodied others LOL

Good grief. The right has their panties in a wad over a 6-second phone call from a muppet.

Y'all just keep on being relevant. That's what you do best

Again, libbies making exaggerated claims with no basis in fact or reality.

I see no evidence that anybody is actually concerned with the Muppet skits.

It's a liberoidal bogeyman. Figures that little Emmie would jump right in!

 

[rightwinger]

Grouch News Network, or GNN. The skit features CNN’s Anderson Cooper filling in for Oscar as he chats with “Walter Cranky” and “Dan Rather-Not,” parodies on Walter Cronkite and Dan Rather.

Apparently it was ok as long as they parodied others LOL

Good grief. The right has their panties in a wad over a 6-second phone call from a muppet.

Y'all just keep on being relevant. That's what you do best

You don't understand


Muppets are INDOCTRINATING our children!

 

[Zander]

Sesame Street is a ratings juggernaut!!

....something like 300 kids watch the show every single day!!

 

[rightwinger]

Sesame Street is turning our kids into liberals

 

[ihopehefails]

You guys are calling Sesame Street subversive now???

Where will it end?

No because subversion implies that conservatism is about the government and authority because a subversive is someone who opposes authority and that is not liberalism whatsoever.

 

[Liability]

You guys are calling Sesame Street subversive now???

Where will it end?

No because subversion implies that conservatism is about the government and authority because a subversive is someone who opposes authority and that is not liberalism whatsoever.

Libbies embrace authority.

They only react badly to it when they are hoisted on their petard, so to speak... (BOOM!)

But otherwise, their devotion to centralized authority has a great deal of explanatory power when we see them cheering like the organ grinder's monkey whenever their dear leader imposes (with the aid of the socialist asswipes in Congress) any new form of government authority over the lives of Americans. They fawn over President Obama like utter sycophants. Again, just another example of their deep devotion to the principles of central authroity over individuals and at the expense of liberty. (I am always pleasantly surprised and pleased when any person of modern American "liberal" ideology breaks away from the slavish devotion to President Obama long enough to be objective and even marginally critical of his Administration's policies and actions.)

 

[rightwinger]

You guys are calling Sesame Street subversive now???

Where will it end?

No because subversion implies that conservatism is about the government and authority because a subversive is someone who opposes authority and that is not liberalism whatsoever.

Libbies embrace authority.

They only react badly to it when they are hoisted on their petard, so to speak... (BOOM!)

But otherwise, their devotion to centralized authority has a great deal of explanatory power when we see them cheering like the organ grinder's monkey whenever their dear leader imposes (with the aid of the socialist asswipes in Congress) any new form of government authority over the lives of Americans. They fawn over President Obama like utter sycophants. Again, just another example of their deep devotion to the principles of central authroity over individuals and at the expense of liberty. (I am always pleasantly surprised and pleased when any person of modern American "liberal" ideology breaks away from the slavish devotion to President Obama long enough to be objective and even marginally critical of his Administration's policies and actions.)

Its far from "embracing authority"

It is simply allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that "We the people" elected them to do.
It is the subversive right wingnuts sitting on the outside pouting like chastised children who are the asswipes.

We gave eight years to embracing the doctrine of the rightwing. Two wars were started and the country was driven into a deep recession.

We the people, have spoken and driven the right wing into exile

 

[KittenKoder]

Sesame Street is turning our kids into liberals

Real liberals aren't as stupid as what television makes kids.

 

[Liability]

No because subversion implies that conservatism is about the government and authority because a subversive is someone who opposes authority and that is not liberalism whatsoever.

Libbies embrace authority.

They only react badly to it when they are hoisted on their petard, so to speak... (BOOM!)

But otherwise, their devotion to centralized authority has a great deal of explanatory power when we see them cheering like the organ grinder's monkey whenever their dear leader imposes (with the aid of the socialist asswipes in Congress) any new form of government authority over the lives of Americans. They fawn over President Obama like utter sycophants. Again, just another example of their deep devotion to the principles of central authroity over individuals and at the expense of liberty. (I am always pleasantly surprised and pleased when any person of modern American "liberal" ideology breaks away from the slavish devotion to President Obama long enough to be objective and even marginally critical of his Administration's policies and actions.)

Its far from "embracing authority"

It is simply allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that "We the people" elected them to do.
It is the subversive right wingnuts sitting on the outside pouting like chastised children who are the asswipes.

We gave eight years to embracing the doctrine of the rightwing. Two wars were started and the country was driven into a deep recession.

We the people, have spoken and driven the right wing into exile

No.

It is not far from embracing authority. It is embracing authority.

It is not even remotely "allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that 'We the people' elected them to [enact]."

I never elected anybody to violate the Constitutional limitations on what they may enact.

We, the People and the States, have every right to insist that the elected officials STOP violating the Constitution by their persistent ignoring the of the FACT that what we set up in the first place was a LIMITED Government.

You libs absolutely do embrace authority because, as Mark Levin has correctly observed, you are all Statists. And nobody is sitting around pouting that the other Party won. If that was all that there was to it, there'd be nothing to get worked up over. Instead, it is the fact that YOUR side absolutely defiles and tramples upon the Constitutional precepts of a LIMITED Government of ENUMERATED powers that makes some of us rather alarmed and angry.

And sitting around sulking would be both foolish and dangerous. There is much work to be done to throw you liberal Democrat Parody transgressors the hell out of our government. And because of your dangerous proclivities to shred Constitutional limitations, time is very much of the essence.

 

[ihopehefails]

No because subversion implies that conservatism is about the government and authority because a subversive is someone who opposes authority and that is not liberalism whatsoever.

Libbies embrace authority.

They only react badly to it when they are hoisted on their petard, so to speak... (BOOM!)

But otherwise, their devotion to centralized authority has a great deal of explanatory power when we see them cheering like the organ grinder's monkey whenever their dear leader imposes (with the aid of the socialist asswipes in Congress) any new form of government authority over the lives of Americans. They fawn over President Obama like utter sycophants. Again, just another example of their deep devotion to the principles of central authroity over individuals and at the expense of liberty. (I am always pleasantly surprised and pleased when any person of modern American "liberal" ideology breaks away from the slavish devotion to President Obama long enough to be objective and even marginally critical of his Administration's policies and actions.)

Its far from "embracing authority"

It is simply allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that "We the people" elected them to do.
It is the subversive right wingnuts sitting on the outside pouting like chastised children who are the asswipes.

We gave eight years to embracing the doctrine of the rightwing. Two wars were started and the country was driven into a deep recession.

We the people, have spoken and driven the right wing into exile

I hate to tell you this but lefties are not the whole people. You are not 100% of the population so stop trying to claim that your side is the people and everyone else is some kind of foreigner in this country.

Anyways, who's policy drove us there? I'm wondering if you can say freddie and fannie may and remember Barny (no not the purple dinosaur) blocking any legislation that would put sane rules on the lending policies of the banks? Do you remember 4.3% unemployment or did the ministry of truth erase that from history?

 

[rightwinger]

Libbies embrace authority.

They only react badly to it when they are hoisted on their petard, so to speak... (BOOM!)

But otherwise, their devotion to centralized authority has a great deal of explanatory power when we see them cheering like the organ grinder's monkey whenever their dear leader imposes (with the aid of the socialist asswipes in Congress) any new form of government authority over the lives of Americans. They fawn over President Obama like utter sycophants. Again, just another example of their deep devotion to the principles of central authroity over individuals and at the expense of liberty. (I am always pleasantly surprised and pleased when any person of modern American "liberal" ideology breaks away from the slavish devotion to President Obama long enough to be objective and even marginally critical of his Administration's policies and actions.)

Its far from "embracing authority"

It is simply allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that "We the people" elected them to do.
It is the subversive right wingnuts sitting on the outside pouting like chastised children who are the asswipes.

We gave eight years to embracing the doctrine of the rightwing. Two wars were started and the country was driven into a deep recession.

We the people, have spoken and driven the right wing into exile

No.

It is not far from embracing authority. It is embracing authority.

It is not even remotely "allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that 'We the people' elected them to [enact]."

I never elected anybody to violate the Constitutional limitations on what they may enact.

We, the People and the States, have every right to insist that the elected officials STOP violating the Constitution by their persistent ignoring the of the FACT that what we set up in the first place was a LIMITED Government.

You libs absolutely do embrace authority because, as Mark Levin has correctly observed, you are all Statists. And nobody is sitting around pouting that the other Party won. If that was all that there was to it, there'd be nothing to get worked up over. Instead, it is the fact that YOUR side absolutely defiles and tramples upon the Constitutional precepts of a LIMITED Government of ENUMERATED powers that makes some of us rather alarmed and angry.

And sitting around sulking would be both foolish and dangerous. There is much work to be done to throw you liberal Democrat Parody transgressors the hell out of our government. And because of your dangerous proclivities to shred Constitutional limitations, time is very much of the essence.

The duly elected government from "We the people" have not violated a single Constitutional act. Within the bounds of our great Constitution you are free to question the legality of anything that has been done by this administration. That is why we have courts. As you well know, your childish rants of unconstitutionality will not stand up in court.

Just because you were defeated by a 2:1 margin in the past Presidential election and no longer get to call the shots does not make it unconstitutional

 

[rightwinger]

Do you remember 4.3% unemployment or did the ministry of truth erase that from history?

Oh yes I do remember what our economy was before the republicans destroyed it. Bush nearly DOUBLED that unemployment before he left office

I also remember a 14,000 Dow Jones that the REPUBLICAN RECESSION drove down to 6500

I also remember $4.00 a gallon gas and a collapsed housing markert

That is one of many reasons "We the People" decided we no longer wanted republicans to ruin....I mean run the country

Democracy at its finest