Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Its far from "embracing authority"
It is simply allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that "We the people" elected them to do.
It is the subversive right wingnuts sitting on the outside pouting like chastised children who are the asswipes.
We gave eight years to embracing the doctrine of the rightwing. Two wars were started and the country was driven into a deep recession.
We the people, have spoken and driven the right wing into exile
No.
It is not far from embracing authority. It is embracing authority.
It is not even remotely "allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that 'We the people' elected them to [enact]."
I never elected anybody to violate the Constitutional limitations on what they may enact.
We, the People and the States, have every right to insist that the elected officials STOP violating the Constitution by their persistent ignoring the of the FACT that what we set up in the first place was a LIMITED Government.
You libs absolutely do embrace authority because, as Mark Levin has correctly observed, you are all Statists. And nobody is sitting around pouting that the other Party won. If that was all that there was to it, there'd be nothing to get worked up over. Instead, it is the fact that YOUR side absolutely defiles and tramples upon the Constitutional precepts of a LIMITED Government of ENUMERATED powers that makes some of us rather alarmed and angry.
And sitting around sulking would be both foolish and dangerous. There is much work to be done to throw you liberal Democrat Parody transgressors the hell out of our government. And because of your dangerous proclivities to shred Constitutional limitations, time is very much of the essence.
The duly elected government from "We the people" have not violated a single Constitutional act. Within the bounds of our great Constitution you are free to question the legality of anything that has been done by this administration. That is why we have courts. As you well know, your childish rants of unconstitutionality will not stand up in court.
Just because you were defeated by a 2:1 margin in the past Presidential election and no longer get to call the shots does not make it unconstitutional
'Sesame Street' Ombudsman Says Fox News Parody 'Should Have Been Resisted' - FOXNews.com
According to this article grouches weren't happy with GNN so they turned to something "grouchier" called Pox News. Now the simularity between Pox and Fox could be chalked up to creative coincidence but wouldn't a grouch who wants to find a grouchier news network go and find one called More Grouchier News Network? That would make more sense but they chose "POX" which happens to rhyme with Fox news which attracts a lot of conservatives.
Now the implication here is that they are comparing conservatives to grouches that (like the grouches who were tired of GNN) fled CNN for something even more conservative or grouchier like Fox news.
Some might say that this is not a big deal and in many ways it is not but the fact that this appears on a children's show and on state funded television makes it a dangerous bit of state propaganda that assaults a certain political view that it does not want you to have. This could be "crazy" but when has Sesame Street ever did a similar skit involving politics or anything involving real life. Most of its show's skits revolve around the happenings and politics of the fictional world of Sesame Street and never once attempted go outside that setting yet the writers felt the need to write their viewpoint of real life politics into an influential children's skit.
We must now question the motives of the writers about why they decided to spend their time creating this. It could be just sport and but if so why not put a more likeable character into the skit such as Big Bird or the Cookie monster. They chose an unlikable character to associate conservatives with and this has an affect on the decision these children will have to make about what political beliefs they will live by when they get older. Do they want to be a grouch (conservative) or do they want to emulate one of the "cool" people (liberal) that their favorite singers claim to be.
More than likely, they will always choose to be a likable person and assume the political leanings that likable people have and that will be liberal. This is the social trap that liberals have set conservatives throughout the years. They have turned being conservative into being someone of unlikable character. They pick the worst examples of conservatives such as any who are racist (another unlikable characteristic) while hiding liberals who are equally racist.
Conservative characters in the entertainment world are portrayed as money hungry and indifferent to their fellow man and conservatives who buck this trend such as Ronald Reagan or Sarah Palin are often viciously attacked by the media by endless articles about them because after all the press Gov. Palin gets (who isn't even involved in politics) I would think she is the world itself where writers feel compelled to spend their energies on writing about one person yet neglecting other events such as the massacre in Texas (has that got as much press as Gov. Palin?).
This is why grouches complain that news isn't grouch enough so they turn to a more grouchier new network where grouch is a codeword for conservativism.
Do you remember 4.3% unemployment or did the ministry of truth erase that from history?
Oh yes I do remember what our economy was before the republicans destroyed it. Bush nearly DOUBLED that unemployment before he left office
I also remember a 14,000 Dow Jones that the REPUBLICAN RECESSION drove down to 6500
I also remember $4.00 a gallon gas and a collapsed housing markert
That is one of many reasons "We the People" decided we no longer wanted republicans to ruin....I mean run the country
Democracy at its finest
Its far from "embracing authority"
It is simply allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that "We the people" elected them to do.
It is the subversive right wingnuts sitting on the outside pouting like chastised children who are the asswipes.
We gave eight years to embracing the doctrine of the rightwing. Two wars were started and the country was driven into a deep recession.
We the people, have spoken and driven the right wing into exile
No.
It is not far from embracing authority. It is embracing authority.
It is not even remotely "allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that 'We the people' elected them to [enact]."
I never elected anybody to violate the Constitutional limitations on what they may enact.
We, the People and the States, have every right to insist that the elected officials STOP violating the Constitution by their persistent ignoring the of the FACT that what we set up in the first place was a LIMITED Government.
You libs absolutely do embrace authority because, as Mark Levin has correctly observed, you are all Statists. And nobody is sitting around pouting that the other Party won. If that was all that there was to it, there'd be nothing to get worked up over. Instead, it is the fact that YOUR side absolutely defiles and tramples upon the Constitutional precepts of a LIMITED Government of ENUMERATED powers that makes some of us rather alarmed and angry.
And sitting around sulking would be both foolish and dangerous. There is much work to be done to throw you liberal Democrat Parody transgressors the hell out of our government. And because of your dangerous proclivities to shred Constitutional limitations, time is very much of the essence.
The duly elected government from "We the people" have not violated a single Constitutional act. Within the bounds of our great Constitution you are free to question the legality of anything that has been done by this administration. That is why we have courts. As you well know, your childish rants of unconstitutionality will not stand up in court.
Just because you were defeated by a 2:1 margin in the past Presidential election and no longer get to call the shots does not make it unconstitutional
You guys are calling Sesame Street subversive now???
Where will it end?
Do you remember 4.3% unemployment or did the ministry of truth erase that from history?
Oh yes I do remember what our economy was before the republicans destroyed it. Bush nearly DOUBLED that unemployment before he left office
I also remember a 14,000 Dow Jones that the REPUBLICAN RECESSION drove down to 6500
I also remember $4.00 a gallon gas and a collapsed housing markert
That is one of many reasons "We the People" decided we no longer wanted republicans to ruin....I mean run the country
Democracy at its finest
I believe that the dow was 9000 before Clinton left office and recessions happen dude and it was a very light recession when compared to the one Obama created with his communist policies.
No.
It is not far from embracing authority. It is embracing authority.
It is not even remotely "allowing the duly elected government to enact the policies that 'We the people' elected them to [enact]."
I never elected anybody to violate the Constitutional limitations on what they may enact.
We, the People and the States, have every right to insist that the elected officials STOP violating the Constitution by their persistent ignoring the of the FACT that what we set up in the first place was a LIMITED Government.
You libs absolutely do embrace authority because, as Mark Levin has correctly observed, you are all Statists. And nobody is sitting around pouting that the other Party won. If that was all that there was to it, there'd be nothing to get worked up over. Instead, it is the fact that YOUR side absolutely defiles and tramples upon the Constitutional precepts of a LIMITED Government of ENUMERATED powers that makes some of us rather alarmed and angry.
And sitting around sulking would be both foolish and dangerous. There is much work to be done to throw you liberal Democrat Parody transgressors the hell out of our government. And because of your dangerous proclivities to shred Constitutional limitations, time is very much of the essence.
The duly elected government from "We the people" have not violated a single Constitutional act. Within the bounds of our great Constitution you are free to question the legality of anything that has been done by this administration. That is why we have courts. As you well know, your childish rants of unconstitutionality will not stand up in court.
Just because you were defeated by a 2:1 margin in the past Presidential election and no longer get to call the shots does not make it unconstitutional
In reality (an alien concept to you) almost everything this President has gotten Congress to enact constitutes a violation of the Constitution. Having "courts" to challenge such acts is not of much help where the same courts pretend that anything goes under the false banner of "the commerce clause" etc. So sad that you have not yet figured that much out.
And there was no 2:1 margin of victory for President Obama, either. YOU must be (retardedly) alluding to the approximate ELECTORAL COLLEGE margin. But the popular vote (that is to say, the vote of We, the People) was only about 52 -47%.
Try again, dipstick.
Yes I remember the great Clinton economy and I remember Bush turning that into 7*% UE by the time he left.Do you remember 4.3% unemployment or did the ministry of truth erase that from history?
Yes I remember the great Clinton economy and I remember Bush turning that into 7*% UE by the time he left.Do you remember 4.3% unemployment or did the ministry of truth erase that from history?
