Does Bill OReilly actually want Congress to find the truth? or is he is providing an escape hatch for Barack Taqiyya?
OReillys interpretation implies that no order to stand down was given. Thats ridiculous on the face of it. Logically, the first concern of military commanders is to get in there and rescue the men under attack. I will never believe that at least one top commander did not say Lets go right now. At that point the order to stand down had to be given, or the military would have proceeded. Subsequent testimony by military men indicated frustration over a rescue mission that was scratched AFTER it was suggested.
OReilly went on to say:
That might be OReillys key question, but it sure as hell isnt mine. Congressional committees wasting time trying to find out who came up with a false narrative is part of the coverup. NOBODY except Congress and the media gives a rats ass about the inevitable official answer. The public already knows the truth. The public also knows that even if OReillys key question is answered nothing will be done about it. Who would go to jail? Suzy Five Shows! or the president? or Hillary Clinton? or somebody else who lied, or everybody that lied about Benghazi? Get real.
OReilly then says:
EVERY DEMOCRAT IN CONGRESS ALREADY KNOWS THE TRUTH. They simply do not want the truth to come out. Thats a lot different than not wanting to know. Rather than batting around a search for the origin of the false narrative, the media should be analyzing why liars like Nancy Reid are running scared? I can tell you it aint the false narrative that worries them. Its the public learning who gave the order to stand down.
NOTE: Pelosi could not stop John Boehner from appointing a select committee. Senator Ted Cruz will not get Harry Reid to empanel a select committee on the Senate side.
Finally, last nights talking points was not the first time OReilly tried to open an escape hatch for the president. In early February he offered up Leon Panetta as the key to finding the truth. That was a bigger joke than last nights comments about Benghazi:
Our military knew quickly that the terrorists were causing damage, but no one gave the order for them to move into Libya.
OReillys interpretation implies that no order to stand down was given. Thats ridiculous on the face of it. Logically, the first concern of military commanders is to get in there and rescue the men under attack. I will never believe that at least one top commander did not say Lets go right now. At that point the order to stand down had to be given, or the military would have proceeded. Subsequent testimony by military men indicated frustration over a rescue mission that was scratched AFTER it was suggested.
OReilly went on to say:
The key question right now is did President Obama, himself, actually come up with false narrative? And no committee will get that defined. . .
That might be OReillys key question, but it sure as hell isnt mine. Congressional committees wasting time trying to find out who came up with a false narrative is part of the coverup. NOBODY except Congress and the media gives a rats ass about the inevitable official answer. The public already knows the truth. The public also knows that even if OReillys key question is answered nothing will be done about it. Who would go to jail? Suzy Five Shows! or the president? or Hillary Clinton? or somebody else who lied, or everybody that lied about Benghazi? Get real.
OReilly then says:
Some in Congress dont want to know the truth about Benghazi.
XXXXX
Again, supporters of the president simply do not want to know.
EVERY DEMOCRAT IN CONGRESS ALREADY KNOWS THE TRUTH. They simply do not want the truth to come out. Thats a lot different than not wanting to know. Rather than batting around a search for the origin of the false narrative, the media should be analyzing why liars like Nancy Reid are running scared? I can tell you it aint the false narrative that worries them. Its the public learning who gave the order to stand down.
NOTE: Pelosi could not stop John Boehner from appointing a select committee. Senator Ted Cruz will not get Harry Reid to empanel a select committee on the Senate side.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k86IxW5EFNI&feature=player_detailpage]Ted Cruz Calls for Joint Select Committee on Benghazi - YouTube[/ame]
Finally, last nights talking points was not the first time OReilly tried to open an escape hatch for the president. In early February he offered up Leon Panetta as the key to finding the truth. That was a bigger joke than last nights comments about Benghazi:
The fact is: Americans who are following the story know everything except who decided not to send help when nobody knew how long the men under attack could hold out. Nobody gives a flying F what Panetta said to the president.
Panetta is an old Communist sympathizer to put it politely. OReilly browbeating Rep. Chaffetz into subpoenaing Panetta can only result in an official whitewash. When the question OReilly poses is asked of Panetta under oath he will lie. The lie will be accepted as the truth because nobody can prove otherwise. That is the outcome OReilly is after. That is newspeak.
Incidentally, Rep. Chaffetz surely knew OReilly was trying to get the president off the hook. If the committee thought Panetta would tell the truth they would have subpoenaed him long before now.