Warren Buffet and Bill Gates are partners in, and champions of, the culture of death:
Bill Gates is also big on abortions in addition to promoting vaccinations as a way to implement population controls. He is not alone:
NOTE: Sylvia Mathews Burwell will soon replace Kathleen Sebelius as Secretary of HHS. Her Senate confirmation hearing begins today. Burwell has a long history with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Will any senator ask her about her views on eugenics, population controls, or protecting abortions cum Planned Parenthood? The long-running joke of Senate confirmation hearings makes the answer obvious.
Being somewhat distrustful of population controls, I asked myself why the New World Order crowd is so committed to open-borders. One answer is that the ideal laborer works cheap without reproducing. Illegal aliens meet the requirements after they are sterilized with vaccines.
Identifying wealthy bloodthirsty moralists serves no purpose. Too many average people cannot see the monster behind the dollar sign. It might make a difference in the preposterous humanitarian image they enjoy by pointing out that the the tax collectors morality is also the morality of wealthy angels of death. Necessarily, Congress must overturn the entire concept of tax deductions for charitable donations in order to prevent blood-soaked moralists from further passing the cost of their morality onto the backs of every taxpayer.
Should eliminating the charitable tax deduction in this country prove to be impossible at least eliminate the deduction when money is donated to foreign entities. If a charitable donation does not directly benefit Americans the tax deduction should be disallowed. (I mean a tangible benefit, not a touchy-feely philosophical benefit.) Its bad enough when characters like Gates and Buffett make everyone pay for their morality a morality most Americans reject. Congress should not let them get away with taking a deduction for giving money to United Nations programs or to foreign entities.
Finally, the tax code is a creature of Congress. The IRS denying conservative organizations tax exempt status is undeniable. Conservative groups are denied for trying to nominate and elect candidates who represent conservative values, yet so-called charitable foundations that actually implement a political agenda are never questioned. To me, Congress allowing Gates, Buffett, Rockefeller, and the rest of them to use tax dollars to enforce their personal beliefs is no different than the IRS establishing a religion.
Buffett obviously has a lot in common with Kermit Gosnell:Warren Buffett gives away his fortune
FORTUNE EXCLUSIVE: The world's second richest man - who's now worth $44 billion - tells editor-at-large Carol Loomis he will start giving away 85% of his wealth in July - most of it to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. By Carol J. Loomis, FORTUNE editor-at-large June 25 2006: 3:08 PM EDT
FORTUNE Magazine: Warren Buffett gives away his fortune - Jun. 25, 2006
May 13, 2014, marks one year since Philadelphia abortion Dr. Kermit Gosnell was convicted of first-degree murder in the deaths of three babies who were delivered alive and then killed with scissors at his grimy, house of horrors clinic, according to the Associated Press. Gosnell instantly became the face of abortion in the prolife community.
But theres another, more recognizable face pushing abortion in the U.S. liberal billionaire Warren Buffett. The so-called Oracle of Omaha has donated more than $1.2 billion to abortion organizations from 2001 to 2012.
Thats equal to the cost of roughly 2.7 million first-trimester abortions more than twice the number of abortions that occur in an entire year in the United States. Unlike Gosnell, however, everything Buffett has done has been entirely legal. But Buffett does share something else in common with the abortionist. Both their stories have been largely unreported.
Imagine the equivalent of the lives of 2.7 million children snuffed out to serve the whims of the third richest man in the world. Most people would say thats a story, most likely several.
Oh no, supporters will cry. Planned Parenthood, NARAL and other similar groups do more than just abortions. And Buffett does more than fund the abortion industry. But that is the core of his agenda, just as it is theirs.
Warren Buffett has given $1.2 billion to abortion groups
By Dan Gainor
Published May 13, 2014
Warren Buffett has given $1.2 billion to abortion groups | Fox News
Bill Gates is also big on abortions in addition to promoting vaccinations as a way to implement population controls. He is not alone:
Software billionaire Bill Gates, who previously has advocated the reduction of the human population through the use of vaccines, and his wife Melinda marked the 100th year since the First International Eugenics Congress in London with a family planning summit with abortionists and the United Nations.
The pseudoscience of eugenics has been around for more than a century. Many of the wealthiest Americans, including Teddy Roosevelt, were eugenicists before the beginning of the twentieth century. Twenty-first century eugenicists include:
In addition to Gates, the meeting included some of the biggest names in the billionaires club, according to the London Times, including David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, Oprah Winfrey, Warren Buffett, George Soros and Michael Bloomberg.
NOTE: Sylvia Mathews Burwell will soon replace Kathleen Sebelius as Secretary of HHS. Her Senate confirmation hearing begins today. Burwell has a long history with the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Will any senator ask her about her views on eugenics, population controls, or protecting abortions cum Planned Parenthood? The long-running joke of Senate confirmation hearings makes the answer obvious.
Being somewhat distrustful of population controls, I asked myself why the New World Order crowd is so committed to open-borders. One answer is that the ideal laborer works cheap without reproducing. Illegal aliens meet the requirements after they are sterilized with vaccines.
Identifying wealthy bloodthirsty moralists serves no purpose. Too many average people cannot see the monster behind the dollar sign. It might make a difference in the preposterous humanitarian image they enjoy by pointing out that the the tax collectors morality is also the morality of wealthy angels of death. Necessarily, Congress must overturn the entire concept of tax deductions for charitable donations in order to prevent blood-soaked moralists from further passing the cost of their morality onto the backs of every taxpayer.
Should eliminating the charitable tax deduction in this country prove to be impossible at least eliminate the deduction when money is donated to foreign entities. If a charitable donation does not directly benefit Americans the tax deduction should be disallowed. (I mean a tangible benefit, not a touchy-feely philosophical benefit.) Its bad enough when characters like Gates and Buffett make everyone pay for their morality a morality most Americans reject. Congress should not let them get away with taking a deduction for giving money to United Nations programs or to foreign entities.
Finally, the tax code is a creature of Congress. The IRS denying conservative organizations tax exempt status is undeniable. Conservative groups are denied for trying to nominate and elect candidates who represent conservative values, yet so-called charitable foundations that actually implement a political agenda are never questioned. To me, Congress allowing Gates, Buffett, Rockefeller, and the rest of them to use tax dollars to enforce their personal beliefs is no different than the IRS establishing a religion.
First Amendment
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.