Congrats 'Zero Tolerance' Democrats...Now, About MENENDEZ...

[edthecynic]

is he still banging kiddies in the carribean?

He never did, as you well know, that was a lie paid for by Tucker Carlson's Daily Caller.

 

[edthecynic]

A mistrial means he was NOT PROVEN guilty.

And he was NOT found 'Innocent' / 'Acquitted'.

He is INNOCENT until PROVEN GUILTY.

lolololol......tell roy moore

Moore himself said the people of Alabama will decide with their vote, and they found him guilty.

 

[JoeB131]

And he was NOT found 'Innocent' / 'Acquitted'.

Our system assumes innocence UNLESS proven guilty. He was not found guilty....

 

[buckeye45_73]

is he still banging kiddies in the carribean?

He never did, as you well know, that was a lie paid for by Tucker Carlson's Daily Caller.

really, how do you know he didnt?

 

[iceberg]

Yes, but according to the Democrats a trial isn't necessary, just the complaint or allegation, even if 40 years old, demands that a person be disqualified. They suggest that the entire GOP party is complicit if they protect him.

I say what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Why did they allow this to go to trial and allow him to remain a Democrat? Shouldn't they have disowned him, throw him under the bus and kicked him out based on the allegations alone?

See, I take the position that a man or woman is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. That doesn't mean innocent men aren't found guilty, or guilty men found innocent, but you have to place faith in a system of justice and in processes. This trial by media is what the Democrats and alt-left love, it places control into the hands of an oligarch. Ironic, since they pretend they dislike Russia so much...

like i continue to say - the liberals love these ideas until they come back to haunt them for pushing it so hard.

it's like they honestly believe they can fling bullshit and no one will fling it back.

 

[buckeye45_73]

And he was NOT found 'Innocent' / 'Acquitted'.

Our system assumes innocence UNLESS proven guilty. He was not found guilty....

yet when a woman sccuses a man of anything we MUST believe her.....nope you need to have proof

 

[buckeye45_73]

Yes, but according to the Democrats a trial isn't necessary, just the complaint or allegation, even if 40 years old, demands that a person be disqualified. They suggest that the entire GOP party is complicit if they protect him.

I say what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Why did they allow this to go to trial and allow him to remain a Democrat? Shouldn't they have disowned him, throw him under the bus and kicked him out based on the allegations alone?

See, I take the position that a man or woman is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. That doesn't mean innocent men aren't found guilty, or guilty men found innocent, but you have to place faith in a system of justice and in processes. This trial by media is what the Democrats and alt-left love, it places control into the hands of an oligarch. Ironic, since they pretend they dislike Russia so much...

like i continue to say - the liberals love these ideas until they come back to haunt them for pushing it so hard.

it's like they honestly believe they can fling bullshit and no one will fling it back.

its because nobody did until trump came along.

 

[iceberg]

Yes, but according to the Democrats a trial isn't necessary, just the complaint or allegation, even if 40 years old, demands that a person be disqualified. They suggest that the entire GOP party is complicit if they protect him.

I say what's good for the goose is good for the gander. Why did they allow this to go to trial and allow him to remain a Democrat? Shouldn't they have disowned him, throw him under the bus and kicked him out based on the allegations alone?

See, I take the position that a man or woman is innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. That doesn't mean innocent men aren't found guilty, or guilty men found innocent, but you have to place faith in a system of justice and in processes. This trial by media is what the Democrats and alt-left love, it places control into the hands of an oligarch. Ironic, since they pretend they dislike Russia so much...

like i continue to say - the liberals love these ideas until they come back to haunt them for pushing it so hard.

it's like they honestly believe they can fling bullshit and no one will fling it back.

its because nobody did until trump came along.

huh?

biden - NO - the lame duck president can't appoint a scotus!
biden many years later - NO - that was different, obama should!!!

democrats - hey, let's create a nuclear option to bypass process!
democrats many years later - oops...

 

[Rustic]

A 'Mistrial' is not the same as an 'Acquittal'...or don't you know that?

Actually, they polled the jury, 11 voted to acquit, one guy held out.

The government isn't going to try him again.

They will find more skeletons in the career politicians closet. Dumbass

 

[easyt65]

Our system assumes innocence UNLESS proven guilty. He was not found guilty....

By your definition, Moore was never found 'Guilty' because there was no trial...yet you and other snowflakes screamed / scream at the top of your lungs about how he IS guilty. Your definition of guilt, as applied, is proven to be based on which political party the individual belongs.

Thank God, in the real world, it doesn't work that way. In the political world, it unfortunately does work that way, which is why Democrats love to carry out these extremely PUBLIC 'hearings' in the media rather than wait until a Republican is PROVEN Guilty in a court of law.

Menendez, however, was not found guilty or innocent. A vast majority cast their vote for 'Not Guilty' based on their own beliefs / convictions. One cast their vote for 'Guilty'. In the end the Jury could not come to a consensus, so no decision was made. That is why the Judge / court system officially declared the case to be a 'Mistrial' and why the media reported it as a 'Mistrial'.

Meanwhile you continue to demonstrate how destructive 'Pride' can be, Despite the Judge, the courts, the legal system, and the media declaring it was a 'mistrial', out of PRIDE after being caught being wrong you continue to fight and argue to justify how YOU are 'right' and 'everyone' else is wrong. Only the prideful, or a child, would continue to do so after being proven to be so completely wrong.

Let it go.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How about Democrats treat Menendez the same way Republicans, and you non-Republican rightwingers,

treat Trump? Fair enough?

 

[easyt65]

How about Democrats treat Menendez the same way Republicans, and you non-Republican rightwingers, treat Trump? Fair enough?

The problem is not that 'rightwingers' do not treat Democrats like they treat their own. It has always been, as proven over and over, that hypocritical Snowflakes / Democrats refuse to treat Conservatives / Republicans as THEY treat THEIR own.

 

[NYcarbineer]

How about Democrats treat Menendez the same way Republicans, and you non-Republican rightwingers, treat Trump? Fair enough?

The problem is not that 'rightwingers' do not treat Democrats like they treat their own. It has always been, as proven over and over, that hypocritical Snowflakes / Democrats refuse to treat Conservatives / Republicans as THEY treat THEIR own.

So conservatives gave Bill Clinton the same pass they're giving Trump? lol, what is wrong with you?

 

[iceberg]

How about Democrats treat Menendez the same way Republicans, and you non-Republican rightwingers,

treat Trump? Fair enough?

by applying a base sense of right and and respect to all regardless of whether i like them or not?

done.

your turn.

 

[easyt65]

So conservatives gave Bill Clinton the same pass they're giving Trump? What's wrong with you?

Bill Clinton was caught red-handed (or rather 'red-dressed') committing adultery in the People's WH (with DNA) and lying his ass off. He was found 'Guilty' of Contempt of Court (as the 1st sitting President to be sued / having to testify in a trial / suit while being President) for attempting to strip an American citizen of her Constitutional Right to a fair trial by being deceitful in his testimony, for which he was stripped of his license to practice law in his home state.

Trump ... has been accused by liberals, who have produced ZERO evidence against him.

What's wrong with YOU?

Oh that's right - you are a sore-loser, butt-hurt, hate-driven Hillary-worshipper who refuses to accept the outcome of an election, which makes you, as Hillary said, a 'threat to our Democracy'.

 

[JoeB131]

yet when a woman sccuses a man of anything we MUST believe her.....nope you need to have proof

well, I'm indifferent one way or the other, and I really do think that some of this stuff has gone too far. All that said, there are different legal standards for a court of law and company policies. Matt Lauer is never going to be convicted, but NBC had him clean out his office.

 

[JoeB131]

Bill Clinton was caught red-handed (or rather 'red-dressed') committing adultery in the People's WH (with DNA) and lying his ass off.

Which isn't a crime.

He was found 'Guilty' of Contempt of Court (as the 1st sitting President to be sued / having to testify in a trial / suit while being President) for attempting to strip an American citizen of her Constitutional Right to a fair trial by being deceitful in his testimony, for which he was stripped of his license to practice law in his home state.

Which just shows why we shouldn't let civil suits proceed against presidents until after they complete their terms. Not to worry, though, when Trump's accusers get him in court, hilarity will ensue.

Trump ... has been accused by liberals, who have produced ZERO evidence against him.

There's better evidence against Trump than there ever was against clinton. Here's the big thing... you didn't have to threaten people with jail to get them to break bad on Trump.

Oh that's right - you are a sore-loser, butt-hurt, hate-driven Hillary-worshipper who refuses to accept the outcome of an election, which makes you, as Hillary said, a 'threat to our Democracy'.

The threat to our democracy was a crazy person was voted against by the people, and took the office with the help of Russian meddling.

 

[easyt65]

The threat to our democracy was a crazy person was voted against by the people,

This comment sums you up - sore-loser, butt-hurt, hate-driven Trump-Hater who refuses to accept the results of the 2016 Election, clinging to Hillary winning the insignificant 'Popularity Contest' which had no bearing on the election.

 

[JoeB131]

This comment sums you up - sore-loser, butt-hurt, hate-driven Trump-Hater who refuses to accept the results of the 2016 Election, clinging to Hillary winning the insignificant 'Popularity Contest' which had no bearing on the election.

Sure it does. It says what the people wanted, the ONLY thing that should count in an election.

 

[easyt65]

This comment sums you up - sore-loser, butt-hurt, hate-driven Trump-Hater who refuses to accept the results of the 2016 Election, clinging to Hillary winning the insignificant 'Popularity Contest' which had no bearing on the election.

Sure it does. It says what the people wanted, the ONLY thing that should count in an election.

That's right - cling to that 'Participation Trophy', poor comfort after losing an election partially because neither you nor Hillary understood the process for electing a US President.