easyt65
Diamond Member
- Aug 4, 2015
- 90,307
- 61,086
- 2,645
The On-Going Witch Hunt that has been going on for 3 years now and has produced ZERO evidence of a crime involving President Trump warranting an investigation and zero evidence of a crime involving President Trump warranting a Special Counsel.
True objective unbiased assessment of the entire Special Counsel investigation reveals Conflicts of Interest, from top to bottom, that Democrats would NEVER stand for.
For example, lets say Barak Obama was being investigated by a Special Counsel for his 'illegal collusion with Russians' for his actions in 2014 (Crimea, Uranium One/20% of US supply of uranium to the Russians, Known interference/hacking and doing nothing, knowing and allowing Hillary to operate an illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured server containing TS data that resulted in 6 foreign entities successfully getting TS data off of her server...) and there were this many Conflicts of Interests involving the Deputy Director of the DOJ, The Special Counsel Lead, and the Special Counsel Staff Liberals' heads would be exploding right now. They would raise hell and never let it happen.
Just Look At All The Conflict of Interest Involved In This On-Going 'Investigation':
ROSENSTEIN
1. Rosenstein recommended that fire FBI Director James Comey— then handpicked Robert Mueller to investigate why Trump fired Comey. It’s akin to you or I being allowed to hire the guy who’s going judge our own actions.
2. Not only that, Rosenstein’s pick — Mueller — is a longtime colleague of Comey’s, whose own behavior was found to be “extraordinary and insubordinate,” according to the recent DOJ’s inspector general report.
3. Rosenstein reviewed and signed off on controversial wiretaps of Trump associate Carter Page, who was never charged with a crime despite being tracked under four FBI wiretap approvals.
The wiretaps Rosenstein signed had relied, in part, on anti-Trump political opposition research known as the “Steele dossier.” The FBI reportedly had not strictly verified the research as required under the FBI’s Woods Procedures. If that’s the case, Rosenstein (or those who work under him) could be implicated in possible violations of those procedures.
4. Rosenstein is in the position to decide whether to pursue criminal charges against the man who provided the anti-Trump “oppo” research used for the wiretaps that Rosenstein approved: Christopher Steele. But implicating Steele — an FBI source — could call into question the actions of Rosenstein himself and his colleagues. Rosenstein has taken no public action on a criminal referral against Steele sent to him almost six months ago by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).
5. Under Rosenstein, the Department of Justice and FBI have withheld and improperly redacted information Congress requested. One key withheld text exchange was dated Aug. 9, 2016. It was between the FBI’s former top counterespionage official, Peter Strzok, and his reported mistress, FBI attorney Lisa Page.
MUELLER:
1. Friend and ‘mentor’ of the previous Director of the FBI, James Comey
2. Former Director of the FBI under President Obama – Perception of Loyalty & Defense of the FBI
3. 2014: Mueller refused to arrest Russians engaging in numerous crimes associated with their effort to acquire Uranium One until AFTER the deal had gone through. The PERCEPTION of his own collusion with / aiding and abetting the Russians is a Conflict based on PERCEPTION, which, again, is ‘reality’
4. Past Record: Evidence shows Mueller withheld evidence proving a man Mueller sent to jail was innocent. All evidence in the case pointed to terrorists committing the crime, but Mueller rejected the evidence and continued to go after the man he put in jail. Even after the man was released years later after the withheld evidence surfaced Mueller continued to insist the main he wrongly put in jail ‘COULD HAVE’ had something to do with the crime, despite the evidence he withheld proving otherwise.
-- The US IG has already filed a report stating the FBI in its investigations illegally manipulated witness testimony AFTER THE FACT. That has ‘Mueller’ and Mueller’s mentored protégé ‘Comey’ written all over it.
5. Obstruction of Justice: In Mueller’s pursuit of evidence of a crime involving the President Mueller, like Rosenstein, has and continues to Obstruct Justice by refusing to comply with a Congressional Subpoena, refusing to acknowledge / allow the legal Congressional Oversight of his Special Counsel Investigation. The fact that the CRIMINAL who is breaking the law and defying Congress is the Special Counsel – who obviously thinks he is the most powerful person in the US and does not have to answer to anyone – and has been supposedly charged with the task of finding criminal activity and dealing with it in his investigation.
MUELLER’S TEAM:
Special Counsel Mueller showed no concern for building a team that was above concerns of ‘bias’ or that would give the perception of a ‘stacked deck’ against the President. His entire Special Counsel consisted of:
- Prominent Democrats
- Democratic Party /Hillary Donors
- A Clinton Foundation Lawyer who was (/is) in charge of running the Clinton Foundation (which benefitted form over $125 MILLION in donations from the Russian KGB Bank, specifically made by the Russian who would lead the KGB Bank’s efforts to acquire Uranium One several years later)
- Disgraced / exposed criminally anti-Trump biased FBI Agent Strzok..until Mueller was FORCED to fre him from his team after Strzok’s seditious / treasonous role in the Anti-Trump Conspiracy was revealed.
-- Evidence Shows it was Strzok who altered FBI Director Comey’s final report on the Hillary Server investigation in which Comey wrote several times how Hillary Clinton had been ‘grossly negligent’ in the handling of classified. ‘Grossly Negligent’ was a term contained in the very definition of the law she violated. Strzok changed the verbiage of the report to prevent Clinton from being indicted.
-- Evidence / his own texts to his adulterous FBI partner talked about a Secret Society who had already met, how they were not going to allow Trump to become President, how they had a back-up plan, and declared, ‘We Will Stop Him!’ Strzok later lied to Congress, declaring his preference for Hillary and dislike got the President had not affected his performance, that the sentence ‘We will stop him’ was describing how other Americans – not him or the FBI – would stop Trump. The FBI agent Strzok was having an affair with, whom he texted all this to, contradicted his testimony, declaring the words Strzok wrote are EXACTLY what he meant / mean EXACTLY what they say.
ALL OF THIS DOES NOT EVEN COVER ALL OF THE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST INVOLVING DEMPOCRATS IN THIS CASE...
Again, if roles were reversed, Democrats would be raising hell and would never stand for this.
Rosenstein conflicts undermine legitimacy of Mueller's investigation
True objective unbiased assessment of the entire Special Counsel investigation reveals Conflicts of Interest, from top to bottom, that Democrats would NEVER stand for.
For example, lets say Barak Obama was being investigated by a Special Counsel for his 'illegal collusion with Russians' for his actions in 2014 (Crimea, Uranium One/20% of US supply of uranium to the Russians, Known interference/hacking and doing nothing, knowing and allowing Hillary to operate an illegal unauthorized unencrypted unsecured server containing TS data that resulted in 6 foreign entities successfully getting TS data off of her server...) and there were this many Conflicts of Interests involving the Deputy Director of the DOJ, The Special Counsel Lead, and the Special Counsel Staff Liberals' heads would be exploding right now. They would raise hell and never let it happen.
Just Look At All The Conflict of Interest Involved In This On-Going 'Investigation':
ROSENSTEIN
1. Rosenstein recommended that fire FBI Director James Comey— then handpicked Robert Mueller to investigate why Trump fired Comey. It’s akin to you or I being allowed to hire the guy who’s going judge our own actions.
2. Not only that, Rosenstein’s pick — Mueller — is a longtime colleague of Comey’s, whose own behavior was found to be “extraordinary and insubordinate,” according to the recent DOJ’s inspector general report.
3. Rosenstein reviewed and signed off on controversial wiretaps of Trump associate Carter Page, who was never charged with a crime despite being tracked under four FBI wiretap approvals.
The wiretaps Rosenstein signed had relied, in part, on anti-Trump political opposition research known as the “Steele dossier.” The FBI reportedly had not strictly verified the research as required under the FBI’s Woods Procedures. If that’s the case, Rosenstein (or those who work under him) could be implicated in possible violations of those procedures.
4. Rosenstein is in the position to decide whether to pursue criminal charges against the man who provided the anti-Trump “oppo” research used for the wiretaps that Rosenstein approved: Christopher Steele. But implicating Steele — an FBI source — could call into question the actions of Rosenstein himself and his colleagues. Rosenstein has taken no public action on a criminal referral against Steele sent to him almost six months ago by Sens. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) and Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.).
5. Under Rosenstein, the Department of Justice and FBI have withheld and improperly redacted information Congress requested. One key withheld text exchange was dated Aug. 9, 2016. It was between the FBI’s former top counterespionage official, Peter Strzok, and his reported mistress, FBI attorney Lisa Page.
MUELLER:
1. Friend and ‘mentor’ of the previous Director of the FBI, James Comey
2. Former Director of the FBI under President Obama – Perception of Loyalty & Defense of the FBI
3. 2014: Mueller refused to arrest Russians engaging in numerous crimes associated with their effort to acquire Uranium One until AFTER the deal had gone through. The PERCEPTION of his own collusion with / aiding and abetting the Russians is a Conflict based on PERCEPTION, which, again, is ‘reality’
4. Past Record: Evidence shows Mueller withheld evidence proving a man Mueller sent to jail was innocent. All evidence in the case pointed to terrorists committing the crime, but Mueller rejected the evidence and continued to go after the man he put in jail. Even after the man was released years later after the withheld evidence surfaced Mueller continued to insist the main he wrongly put in jail ‘COULD HAVE’ had something to do with the crime, despite the evidence he withheld proving otherwise.
-- The US IG has already filed a report stating the FBI in its investigations illegally manipulated witness testimony AFTER THE FACT. That has ‘Mueller’ and Mueller’s mentored protégé ‘Comey’ written all over it.
5. Obstruction of Justice: In Mueller’s pursuit of evidence of a crime involving the President Mueller, like Rosenstein, has and continues to Obstruct Justice by refusing to comply with a Congressional Subpoena, refusing to acknowledge / allow the legal Congressional Oversight of his Special Counsel Investigation. The fact that the CRIMINAL who is breaking the law and defying Congress is the Special Counsel – who obviously thinks he is the most powerful person in the US and does not have to answer to anyone – and has been supposedly charged with the task of finding criminal activity and dealing with it in his investigation.
MUELLER’S TEAM:
Special Counsel Mueller showed no concern for building a team that was above concerns of ‘bias’ or that would give the perception of a ‘stacked deck’ against the President. His entire Special Counsel consisted of:
- Prominent Democrats
- Democratic Party /Hillary Donors
- A Clinton Foundation Lawyer who was (/is) in charge of running the Clinton Foundation (which benefitted form over $125 MILLION in donations from the Russian KGB Bank, specifically made by the Russian who would lead the KGB Bank’s efforts to acquire Uranium One several years later)
- Disgraced / exposed criminally anti-Trump biased FBI Agent Strzok..until Mueller was FORCED to fre him from his team after Strzok’s seditious / treasonous role in the Anti-Trump Conspiracy was revealed.
-- Evidence Shows it was Strzok who altered FBI Director Comey’s final report on the Hillary Server investigation in which Comey wrote several times how Hillary Clinton had been ‘grossly negligent’ in the handling of classified. ‘Grossly Negligent’ was a term contained in the very definition of the law she violated. Strzok changed the verbiage of the report to prevent Clinton from being indicted.
-- Evidence / his own texts to his adulterous FBI partner talked about a Secret Society who had already met, how they were not going to allow Trump to become President, how they had a back-up plan, and declared, ‘We Will Stop Him!’ Strzok later lied to Congress, declaring his preference for Hillary and dislike got the President had not affected his performance, that the sentence ‘We will stop him’ was describing how other Americans – not him or the FBI – would stop Trump. The FBI agent Strzok was having an affair with, whom he texted all this to, contradicted his testimony, declaring the words Strzok wrote are EXACTLY what he meant / mean EXACTLY what they say.
ALL OF THIS DOES NOT EVEN COVER ALL OF THE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST INVOLVING DEMPOCRATS IN THIS CASE...
Again, if roles were reversed, Democrats would be raising hell and would never stand for this.
Rosenstein conflicts undermine legitimacy of Mueller's investigation
