Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Anyone who points out the terrible damage done to black Americans by leftism, is automatically labeled a racist and of course...an Uncle Tom.
FURTHER proof of the corrupt and deceitful nature of leftism?
Well, the fact that a lot of these Uncle Toms like Bill Cosby and Herman Cain usually turn out to be really horrible people doesn't help matter much.
You turned out to be a white n****r.
Duly noted that you couldn't answer the point that the kinds of blacks you guys prop up often turn out to be sexual harrassers-- We can add Clarance Thomas to that list, come to think of it.
Duly noted that you call Bill Cosby a sexual harasser although no court has ever convicted him of that.
I don't recall Clarence Thomas being convicted either.
I thought you Liberals said you went by the Constitution. Seems you've convicted all of them without a trial.
Duly noted that you call Bill Cosby a sexual harasser although no court has ever convicted him of that.
I think it's up to 30 women who've accused him of RAPE, not sexual harrassment. And besides the fact you guys accused Clinton of all sorts of stuff without real proof, the stuff against Cosby is pretty damning.
I don't recall Clarence Thomas being convicted either.
I thought you Liberals said you went by the Constitution. Seems you've convicted all of them without a trial.
The constitutions says I can't imprison them without a trial. It doesn't mean I have to believe their incredible stories.
Incidently, I can go either way on Thomas. Anita Hill had a lot of stuff in her narrative that didn't quite add up, like if Thomas was such an awful boss, why did she follow him from one agency to another. the man never should have been named to SCOTUS, though.
It was proven that Clinton was guilty which only shows his past was also true.
It can be 100 but until it's prove, it's just accusations. You've already determined guilt based solely on unfounded claims.
The Constitution operates under the principle of innocent until proven guilty. You've already determined guilt without a trial. Whether you believe it or not is irrelevant. That you have made up your mind does.
He met all the qualifications.
It was proven that Clinton was guilty which only shows his past was also true.
the only thing that was "proven" was that he lied about a blow job. And most sensible, not crazy people said, "Meh, so what. that's his business."
It can be 100 but until it's prove, it's just accusations. You've already determined guilt based solely on unfounded claims.
I've determined guilt based on he's been accused and hasn't refuted anything. If these things didn't happen, it would be easy enough for him to produce other people who were there who said he didn't do that or prove he was in a different place than these ladies said he was. Instead, he's like, "Well, Statue of Limitations, Bitches!!"
The Constitution operates under the principle of innocent until proven guilty. You've already determined guilt without a trial. Whether you believe it or not is irrelevant. That you have made up your mind does.
Guy, here's the thing. I like Cosby. I enjoyed his shows, I enjoy his comedy. I would LOVE for him to come out and prove these women to be liars. but so far, meh, not so much.
He met all the qualifications.
I really wish you wouldn't laundry list your counter argumetns. Okay, guy, here's the thing. Thomas' experience was less than two years on the federal bench. He made no great rulings. He just sat in agencies that Reagan neglected and did nothing.
Duly noted that you call Bill Cosby a sexual harasser although no court has ever convicted him of that.
I think it's up to 30 women who've accused him of RAPE, not sexual harrassment. And besides the fact you guys accused Clinton of all sorts of stuff without real proof, the stuff against Cosby is pretty damning.
I don't recall Clarence Thomas being convicted either.
I thought you Liberals said you went by the Constitution. Seems you've convicted all of them without a trial.
The constitutions says I can't imprison them without a trial. It doesn't mean I have to believe their incredible stories.
Incidently, I can go either way on Thomas. Anita Hill had a lot of stuff in her narrative that didn't quite add up, like if Thomas was such an awful boss, why did she follow him from one agency to another. the man never should have been named to SCOTUS, though.
It was proven that Clinton was guilty which only shows his past was also true.
It can be 100 but until it's prove, it's just accusations. You've already determined guilt based solely on unfounded claims.
I bet I could find thousands that would say you are a moron.
The Constitution operates under the principle of innocent until proven guilty. You've already determined guilt without a trial. Whether you believe it or not is irrelevant. That you have made up your mind does.
He met all the qualifications.
He perjured himself. Last time I look, perjury involves lying and the topic of discussion is irrelevant.
Cosby doesn't have to prove they lied. They have to prove their claims against him. Seems you really don't know how it works.
Sotomayor was nothing more than another appointment based on race/ethnicity and Ginsburg was nothing more than one based on a vagina if she actually has one.
To a hardcore lefty like Lil' Joe, one is guilty without trial, but only if the guilty charge fits leftist dogma.
The truth means little to a leftist. Their ideology trumps all...further proof of their psychosis.
So all the women who accused BJ Bubba are liars...but the women accusing Cosby, are telling the truth.To a hardcore lefty like Lil' Joe, one is guilty without trial, but only if the guilty charge fits leftist dogma.
The truth means little to a leftist. Their ideology trumps all...further proof of their psychosis.
Okay, do you really, really, really think that ALL 30 of these women are lying? Not to mention all the other people who said that they helped cover up Cosby's crimes and arranged payoffs.
Or that just Bill Cosby is.
Simple logic would tell you Cosby is probably lying.
He perjured himself. Last time I look, perjury involves lying and the topic of discussion is irrelevant.
He perjured himself on a question the judge deemed irrelevent to the case on hand, which was thrown out due to lack of merit. A question most Americans felt he never should have been asked to start with because, hey, it was a private matter.
Cosby doesn't have to prove they lied. They have to prove their claims against him. Seems you really don't know how it works.
As far as i'm concerned they've done that. Most people find their claims credible, and frankly, you have yet to disprove any of their stories.
Sotomayor was nothing more than another appointment based on race/ethnicity and Ginsburg was nothing more than one based on a vagina if she actually has one.
dude, I'm starting to worry about your level of misogyny, really.
So all the women who accused BJ Bubba are liars...but the women accusing Cosby, are telling the truth.
Joe...you really are not this dumb
He perjured himself, PERIOD.
It's not private when it happened in a place funded by the public. It's like someone having sex in their house, a private location, and someone having sex in the restroom of the local PUBLIC park. It's the same action but location is relevant.
Saying it happened isn't proof fool. Most people would say you're a fucking moron. There it is. That's all the proof we need.
I don't have to disprove a claim someone made. They have to prove it. You really don't know how things work do you?
Guy works in the system everyday and sees justice first hand.
Confessions of a Public Defender American Renaissance
He perjured himself, PERIOD.
It's not private when it happened in a place funded by the public. It's like someone having sex in their house, a private location, and someone having sex in the restroom of the local PUBLIC park. It's the same action but location is relevant.
The place funded by the public was the house he was living in. sorry, guy, most folks thought Starr went too far, and he did.
Saying it happened isn't proof fool. Most people would say you're a fucking moron. There it is. That's all the proof we need.
Except for people I've humilated on USMB, most people wouldn't say that.
I don't have to disprove a claim someone made. They have to prove it. You really don't know how things work do you?
No, if Cosby wants his reputation back, he'd better be able to prove these women are lying. and maybe not even then. He let this go too long, frankly.
If this got to a court, he'd be found guilty. It's only because the Statue of Limitations has run out that he's in the clear.
It didn't take place in the private residence. The Oval Office isn't where he lived. Peoople like you thought Starr went too far.
Cosby doesn't have to prove his innocence. You still don't understand how the process works. No wonder you voted black in 2012. You thought skin color was a qualification.
He would? Funny how you can now tell the future. Perhaps you should go into that line of work since you can't keep your job in what you do now.
It didn't take place in the private residence. The Oval Office isn't where he lived. Peoople like you thought Starr went too far.
No, guy, 67% of Americans thought Starr went to far, that Clinton never should have been impeached. and they threw Gingrich out on his ass for trying it.
Cosby doesn't have to prove his innocence. You still don't understand how the process works. No wonder you voted black in 2012. You thought skin color was a qualification.
Um, no, guy. Cosby is a Brand. THe brand is America's Dad. That brand is now poison. Do you think anyone is ever going to sign him up to pitch their products? Do you think anyone is ever going to show his movies and TV shows again? Not all judgement comes in a court, dummy. Just ask O.J. Simpson.
He would? Funny how you can now tell the future. Perhaps you should go into that line of work since you can't keep your job in what you do now.
Actually, I've been in the same line of work for the last 15 years, so as usual you are talking out of your ass.
Link please.
Guilt or innocence comes out of a court.
You've been in how many jobs or lost how many in 15 years.?
Link please.
Here's my rule on links. I usually don't provide them unless it's a point I'm interested in making. Usually because the person who asked for htem will pretend they never saw them, or will claim that the source was "biased". (I.E. doesn't subscribe to his batshit view of the world).
CNN ORC Poll Majority say no to impeachment and lawsuit 8211 CNN Political Ticker - CNN.com Blogs
Anti-impeachment sentiment is roughly where it was for past presidents - 67% opposed Bill Clinton's impeachment in September 1998, and 69% opposed impeaching George W. Bush when a few Democrats began talking about it in 2006,"
Guilt or innocence comes out of a court.
No, legal findings come out of courts. Guilt or innocence comes from the facts. If Bill Cosby did the things they say he did, he's guilty. Even if the courts can't touch him, he did what he did.
You've been in how many jobs or lost how many in 15 years.?
In the last 15? 3. Which is actually above average.
More excuses and blaming it on someone else as to why you CAN'T. Your rule is to run your damn mouth and when called on it, make an excuse. If there was a job for that, you'd be the best. Since their isn't, you'll continue to go from job to job making no contribution at all.
Prove Cosby did what he did. That involves using facts. You have provided none.
You're anything but above average. I've worked in the same profession for 27 years at two locations leaving he first one because no more opportunities existed. My mother worked at the same location for over 30 years and my dad for 35. My brother has been with his for 25. Unlike you, my family has a work ethic that employers value. You, after staying just short of them figuring out you're worthless, leave.
