Comparing It To Watergate ? Whaaat ?

protectionist

Diamond Member
Oct 20, 2013
55,727
17,696
2,250
On the ultraliberal PBS show, Washington week, where the Russia/Trump campaign collusion is talked about like it’s something worth talking about, strange words get spoken.

Dan Balz, of the Washington Post, said the issue is being seen by the US public as a comparison to Watergate. Pardon me Dan, but you missed a few words >> that should be >> seen by the US left wing public.

As seen by the sane portion of America (Trump voters), the “issue” is more like a comparison to Peter Pan, Mickey Mouse, and Superman. The crux of it is, here IS NO “issue”. Fabricated wrongdoings are not wrongs or issues. The real issues here are the people’s money, time, and energy being wasted on this evidenceless
charade, when real disgraces exist that should be investigated >> Obama/Baghdadi collusion, intelligence leaks, Islamization, illegal alien voting, etc.
 
Replace Comey with somebody who is not afraid to go after the traitors in the Obama administration. Time to start fighting back. Draining the swamp is a nasty job and he needs to get serious about it. It's why he was elected.
 
Liberals have totally jumped the shark with Trump. It appears they are simply unable to handle the results of last November's election. This morning they had Harvard professor Lawrence Tribe on CNN fake news media saying that "impeachment investigation and proceedings should begin right away" because of Trump "bribing" Comey!

Unbelievable. According to Democrats, everything Trump says or does is an impeachable offence. LOL. What an embarrassment they are to themselves and the country.
 
As mentioned by Bob Woodward (also of the Washington Post, and who exposed the Watergate scandal 45 years ago), there is no comparison. With Watergate, there was real evidence. Nixon's man John Dean, testified for 4 days. In contrast. Democrat ploy boys don't have a shred of evidence after months of scamming.

Woodward on Trump firing Comey: 'This is not yet Watergate'
 
They compare everything to Watergate. It's one of those buzz words they use to make you think somebody did something baaad.
 
They compare everything to Watergate. It's one of those buzz words they use to make you think somebody did something baaad.
If they didn't have the media in their pockets, this wouldn't even be talked about.

Collusion ? We should be talking about the Obama/al Bagdadi collusion. That's the real big story. But the liberal media won't mention it. Or how about the Clinton Bodycount ? Come on media. A little truth please.
 

Forum List

Back
Top