- Thread starter
- #221
Do you understand what the word "HYPOTHETICAL" means?It isn’t logical or possible
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Do you understand what the word "HYPOTHETICAL" means?It isn’t logical or possible
Glad you brought that up. There are a lot of volcanoes under the ice which are being attributed to the rise in the sea temp below. But nobody mentions that.Yep, volcanic but most won't know. They repeat the story leaving out undersea volcanos
Gee...........wouldn't take 7 hours to get to the beach.Eliminate GHG emissions. So what do you think the consquences would be of sea levels rising 20 feet IN ONE WEEK?
New volcanic land masses are being created in the ocean that also affect temps AND sea levels--Crick seems to disregard those as well.Glad you brought that up. There are a lot of volcanoes under the ice which are being attributed to the rise in the sea temp below. But nobody mentions that.
/——/ Sharks frenzy feeding on bloated bodies makes great YouTube videos.Could you? Is someone going to build a nice beach out front? The coastlines of the world would all be massive disaster areas. The bloated dead would be floating outside your door.
With good reason. The experts on sea level take isostasy fully into account.New volcanic land masses are being created in the ocean that also affect temps AND sea levels--Crick seems to disregard those as well.
Newly-formed volcanic island near Japan is still growing, satellite reveals
The island forged in fire off the coast of Japan in October this year is still growing, as seen in a Copernicus Sentinel-2 image caught on Nov. 27.www.livescience.com
Now admitting isostasy could be affecting the sea bottom temps in the Antarctic?With good reason. The experts on sea level take isostasy fully into account.
LMAO, thanks for that. IOW, speculation. OOOOH! THE SKY IS FALLING.With good reason. The experts on sea level take isostasy fully into account.
Then you haven't looked very hard.Gee...........wouldn't take 7 hours to get to the beach.
You know, your alarmist crew always wig out claiming if there is a 1.5C rise in temp......Yaaaaaaaaaaaah.
I haven't seen anyone that will go on record saying what would happen.
Waste of time.......can't find any direct quotes as to what I inferred?Then you haven't looked very hard.
Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Working Group II contribution to the Sixth Assessment Reportwww.ipcc.ch
Waste of time.......can't find any direct quotes as to what I inferred?
If it can’t happen, hypotheticals aren’t rationalDo you understand what the word "HYPOTHETICAL" means?
Notice, broadly written opinion.Observed Impacts from Climate Change
B.1 Human-induced climate change, including more frequent and intense extreme events, has caused widespread adverse impacts and related losses and damages to nature and people, beyond natural climate variability. Some development and adaptation efforts have reduced vulnerability. Across sectors and regions the most vulnerable people and systems are observed to be disproportionately affected. The rise in weather and climate extremes has led to some irreversible impacts as natural and human systems are pushed beyond their ability to adapt. (high confidence) EXPAND Figure SPM.2LINKS TO CHAPTERS
Vulnerability and Exposure of Ecosystems and People
B.2 Vulnerability of ecosystems and people to climate change differs substantially among and within regions (very high confidence, driven by patterns of intersecting socioeconomic development, unsustainable ocean and land use, inequity, marginalization, historical and ongoing patterns of inequity such as colonialism, and governance 31 (high confidence). Approximately 3.3 to 3.6 billion people live in contexts that are highly vulnerable to climate change (high confidence). A high proportion of species is vulnerable to climate change (high confidence). Human and ecosystem vulnerability are interdependent (high confidence). Current unsustainable development patterns are increasing exposure of ecosystems and people to climate hazards (high confidence). EXPANDLINKS TO CHAPTERS
Risks in the near term (2021–2040)
B.3 Global warming, reaching 1.5°C in the near-term, would cause unavoidable increases in multiple climate hazards and present multiple risks to ecosystems and humans (very high confidence). The level of risk will depend on concurrent near-term trends in vulnerability, exposure, level of socioeconomic development and adaptation (high confidence). Near-term actions that limit global warming to close to 1.5°C would substantially reduce projected losses and damages related to climate change in human systems and ecosystems, compared to higher warming levels, but cannot eliminate them all (very high confidence) EXPAND Figure SPM.3
Mid to Long-term Risks (2041–2100)
B.4Beyond 2040 and depending on the level of global warming, climate change will lead to numerous risks to natural and human systems (high confidence). For 127 identified key risks, assessed mid- and long-term impacts are up to multiple times higher than currently observed (high confidence). The magnitude and rate of climate change and associated risks depend strongly on near-term mitigation and adaptation actions, and projected adverse impacts and related losses and damages escalate with every increment of global warming (very high confidence). EXPAND Figure SPM.3 LINKS TO CHAPTERS
Complex, Compound and Cascading Risks
B.5Climate change impacts and risks are becoming increasingly complex and more difficult to manage. Multiple climate hazards will occur simultaneously, and multiple climatic and non-climatic risks will interact, resulting in compounding overall risk and risks cascading across sectors and regions. Some responses to climate change result in new impacts and risks. (high confidence) EXPANDLINKS TO CHAPTERS
Impacts of Temporary Overshoot
B.6If global warming transiently exceeds 1.5°C in the coming decades or later (overshoot) 37 , then many human and natural systems will face additional severe risks, compared to remaining below 1.5°C (high confidence). Depending on the magnitude and duration of overshoot, some impacts will cause release of additional greenhouse gases (medium confidence) and some will be irreversible, even if global warming is reduced (high confidence) EXPAND Figure SPM.3 LINKS TO CHAPTERS
Hypothetically speaking, of course.If it can’t happen, hypotheticals aren’t rational
After all of the attempts at poisoning Human-Beings by the Biden Adm I really don't give a fuck about bottom water temps going up a degree or two.The lack of dissolved nutrients will starve the phytoplankton and that will starve the zooplankton and that will starve the diatoms and that will starve the copepods and that will starve the wee little fish and that will starve the bigger fish all the way up to the ones you'd like to catch. Dead fish don't bite and you're not throwing in enough bait to feed the whole lot - besides which you won't have any bait because they will have starved first. Making humor at catastrophe is not the mark of a clever wit.
Listen to Al gore tell you what for buddyAfter all of the attempts at poisoning Human-Beings by the Biden Adm I really don't give a fuck about bottom water temps going up a degree or two.
And lets go back and look at the devastation they wrought in Maui as well.
The devastation the Biden adminnistration wrought in Maui? Do tell.After all of the attempts at poisoning Human-Beings by the Biden Adm I really don't give a fuck about bottom water temps going up a degree or two.
And lets go back and look at the devastation they wrought in Maui as well.
For you to ignore that disaster is so youThe devastation the Biden adminnistration wrought in Maui? Do tell.
Seems the Deep State has all of these freak accidents and disasters everywhere.The devastation the Biden adminnistration wrought in Maui? Do tell.