Jay Canuck
by Crom you'll pay!
- Jul 30, 2009
- 3,090
- 214
- 48
this is soooooo fucking rich!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
In Canada I took chemistry for 3 years in highschool can I sign up?
salting the fries as they come out of the fry-o-lator doesn't count as "taking chemistry", dimwit.
And yet...the data still exists at the places they obtained it.East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
of course there is, liar.
there's more evidence that these *scientists* threw out the raw data on which they based their *life's work*. even a congenital idiot like yourself should understand that's not good, although you won't.
fuckwit.
Climate change data dumped - Times Online
And yet...the data still exists at the places they obtained it.East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
of course there is, liar.
there's more evidence that these *scientists* threw out the raw data on which they based their *life's work*. even a congenital idiot like yourself should understand that's not good, although you won't.
fuckwit.
Climate change data dumped - Times Online
East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
Here is a popular mechanics article on the stolen emails
How does that change the fact that the stolen emails may have been altered?
I just think it's so adorable when someone refers to a 'may have' as a fact. Yeah, it's a fact that it is not sure one way or the other.How does that change the fact that the stolen emails may have been altered?
East Anglia University Climate Change Email Controversy - ClimateGate Stolen Email and Global Warming - Popular Mechanics
There seem to be some evidence that the Emails were altered
" Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered"
Here is a popular mechanics article on the stolen emails
Furthermore, though CRU has confirmed that most of the e-mails are genuine, some of them could have been forged or altered. Nevertheless, I think it is important for scientists to clearly state that if basic data were withheld, or if there was unprofessional tampering with the peer-review process, we do not condone these acts. It is equally essential to emphasize that alleged problems with a few scientists' behavior do not change the consensus understanding of human-induced, global climate change, which is a robust hypothesis based on well-established observations and inferences.
ROTFLMAO! Prove a negative. TFF.It IS a fact that some of them may have been altered.
Now prove they were not altered
How does that change the fact that the stolen emails may have been altered?
It IS a fact that some of them may have been altered.
Now prove they were not altered
Real science?
You seem to ignore that the vast majority of science points to man effecting the worlds weather system.
It is a fact that mans actions add to mix.
The debate is to what effect.
There is NO evidence that the world is 6000 years old