Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Because, as we all know, matter will not emit photons in the direction of warmer material. Right? Right?
No answer? Or are you just to embarrassed to say where you think climate science gets its money from?
I asked you, little pissaholic. After all, it was your crazy claim. As usual, instead of backing it up, you deflected by lying.
The climate change industry is in excess of 1.5 trillion dollars per year...
So, you're actually now claiming that money spent to built a wind turbine goes into the pocket of scientist. Even for you, the sheer magnitude of the dishonesty there is rather shocking.
If all the facts didn't say you were an open fraud, you wouldn't have to lie about everything. But they do, so you do.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
Stupidity on stupidity. The global warming 'scare' began about 1820, when Fourier pointed out that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat. That was confirmed in 1859 when Tyndall measured the absorption of IR by the GHGs in the atmosphere. Arrhenius quantified the amount of warming that doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere would create in 1896. Keeling started measuring the CO2 in 1957 on Mauna Loa. Now there are CO2 measuring stations all over the world recording the increase.
So now you admitting 1820?
Way before there was official records, way before any way man could of done it?
Yup Judith and the rest were right.
Science totally ignores the natural variations
Such measurements have been repeatedly made and have been posted here on multiple occasions. Again, you simply lie about any data you do not like.
You DID make up your contention that emitted photons will not travel towards warmer matter.
you do NOT understand the Second Law of Thermodynamics.
You have never had a class in thermo and you would never pass one if you did
How does the Earth’s blanket of air impede the outgoing heat radiation? Fourier tried to explain his insight by comparing the Earth with its covering of air to a box with a glass cover. That was a well-known experiment — the box's interior warms up when sunlight enters while the heat cannot escape. This was an over simple explanation, for it is quite different physics that keeps heat inside an actual glass box, or similarly in a greenhouse. (As Fourier knew, the main effect of the glass is to keep the air, heated by contact with sun-warmed surfaces, from wafting away. The glass does also keep heat radiation from escaping, but that's less important.) Nevertheless, people took up his analogy and trapping of heat by the atmosphere eventually came to be called "the greenhouse effect.
Ah, dumb fuck rightards. What would we do without them.
No answer? Or are you just to embarrassed to say where you think climate science gets its money from?
I asked you, little pissaholic. After all, it was your crazy claim. As usual, instead of backing it up, you deflected by lying.
The climate change industry is in excess of 1.5 trillion dollars per year...
So, you're actually now claiming that money spent to built a wind turbine goes into the pocket of scientist. Even for you, the sheer magnitude of the dishonesty there is rather shocking.
If all the facts didn't say you were an open fraud, you wouldn't have to lie about everything. But they do, so you do.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
Stupidity on stupidity. The global warming 'scare' began about 1820, when Fourier pointed out that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat. That was confirmed in 1859 when Tyndall measured the absorption of IR by the GHGs in the atmosphere. Arrhenius quantified the amount of warming that doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere would create in 1896. Keeling started measuring the CO2 in 1957 on Mauna Loa. Now there are CO2 measuring stations all over the world recording the increase.
So now you admitting 1820?
Way before there was official records, way before any way man could of done it?
Yup Judith and the rest were right.
Science totally ignores the natural variations
Lordy, what a fucking fool you are. Totally ignorant of basic science.
Why we know about the greenhouse gas effect
Our understanding of how certain atmospheric gases trap heat dates back almost 200 years to 1824 when Joseph Fourier described what we know as the greenhouse effect. Fourier, a French mathematician and physicist, asked what seems to be a simple question: why doesn’t the planet keep heating up as it receives sunlight? What is regulating our atmospheric temperature?
Joseph Fourier: bane of countless physics and engineering students.
Knowing that heated surfaces emit radiation (thermal energy), Fourier reasoned that the Earth would emit radiation absorbed by the Sun back into space – resulting in an icy planet. There must be something regulating the temperature – emitting enough thermal energy to keep the planet from freezing and overheating. Not too hot, not too cold.
Fourier’s answer to these questions is formalized in what we now call the greenhouse gas effect. From the American Institute of Physics history of climate change page:
How does the Earth’s blanket of air impede the outgoing heat radiation? Fourier tried to explain his insight by comparing the Earth with its covering of air to a box with a glass cover. That was a well-known experiment — the box's interior warms up when sunlight enters while the heat cannot escape. This was an over simple explanation, for it is quite different physics that keeps heat inside an actual glass box, or similarly in a greenhouse. (As Fourier knew, the main effect of the glass is to keep the air, heated by contact with sun-warmed surfaces, from wafting away. The glass does also keep heat radiation from escaping, but that's less important.) Nevertheless, people took up his analogy and trapping of heat by the atmosphere eventually came to be called "the greenhouse effect.
I asked you, little pissaholic. After all, it was your crazy claim. As usual, instead of backing it up, you deflected by lying.
So, you're actually now claiming that money spent to built a wind turbine goes into the pocket of scientist. Even for you, the sheer magnitude of the dishonesty there is rather shocking.
If all the facts didn't say you were an open fraud, you wouldn't have to lie about everything. But they do, so you do.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
Stupidity on stupidity. The global warming 'scare' began about 1820, when Fourier pointed out that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat. That was confirmed in 1859 when Tyndall measured the absorption of IR by the GHGs in the atmosphere. Arrhenius quantified the amount of warming that doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere would create in 1896. Keeling started measuring the CO2 in 1957 on Mauna Loa. Now there are CO2 measuring stations all over the world recording the increase.
So now you admitting 1820?
Way before there was official records, way before any way man could of done it?
Yup Judith and the rest were right.
Science totally ignores the natural variations
Lordy, what a fucking fool you are. Totally ignorant of basic science.
Why we know about the greenhouse gas effect
Our understanding of how certain atmospheric gases trap heat dates back almost 200 years to 1824 when Joseph Fourier described what we know as the greenhouse effect. Fourier, a French mathematician and physicist, asked what seems to be a simple question: why doesn’t the planet keep heating up as it receives sunlight? What is regulating our atmospheric temperature?
Joseph Fourier: bane of countless physics and engineering students.
Knowing that heated surfaces emit radiation (thermal energy), Fourier reasoned that the Earth would emit radiation absorbed by the Sun back into space – resulting in an icy planet. There must be something regulating the temperature – emitting enough thermal energy to keep the planet from freezing and overheating. Not too hot, not too cold.
Fourier’s answer to these questions is formalized in what we now call the greenhouse gas effect. From the American Institute of Physics history of climate change page:
How does the Earth’s blanket of air impede the outgoing heat radiation? Fourier tried to explain his insight by comparing the Earth with its covering of air to a box with a glass cover. That was a well-known experiment — the box's interior warms up when sunlight enters while the heat cannot escape. This was an over simple explanation, for it is quite different physics that keeps heat inside an actual glass box, or similarly in a greenhouse. (As Fourier knew, the main effect of the glass is to keep the air, heated by contact with sun-warmed surfaces, from wafting away. The glass does also keep heat radiation from escaping, but that's less important.) Nevertheless, people took up his analogy and trapping of heat by the atmosphere eventually came to be called "the greenhouse effect.
Again you don't even see it do you, you admitted that it started to happen before we put C02 with any amount of significance in the atmosphere..
.
.
Greenhouse gases have been warming the planet since they first entered the atmosphere a few billions years ago. They were certainly doing so before humans began producing them in any significant quantity and before the beginning of the Industrial Revolution. The point is that INCREASING combustion of fossil fuels and INCREASING deforestation in INCREASING the levels of GHGs in the Earth's atmosphere which is raising the Earth's equilibrium temperature.
Got it?
Show us what you're talking about Bear. Let's see some data. The Earth has been warming and cooling since the very beginning. Let's see what you've got that looks like the change rate we've had the last 50 years.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
Stupidity on stupidity. The global warming 'scare' began about 1820, when Fourier pointed out that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat. That was confirmed in 1859 when Tyndall measured the absorption of IR by the GHGs in the atmosphere. Arrhenius quantified the amount of warming that doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere would create in 1896. Keeling started measuring the CO2 in 1957 on Mauna Loa. Now there are CO2 measuring stations all over the world recording the increase.
So now you admitting 1820?
Way before there was official records, way before any way man could of done it?
Yup Judith and the rest were right.
Science totally ignores the natural variations
Lordy, what a fucking fool you are. Totally ignorant of basic science.
Why we know about the greenhouse gas effect
Our understanding of how certain atmospheric gases trap heat dates back almost 200 years to 1824 when Joseph Fourier described what we know as the greenhouse effect. Fourier, a French mathematician and physicist, asked what seems to be a simple question: why doesn’t the planet keep heating up as it receives sunlight? What is regulating our atmospheric temperature?
Joseph Fourier: bane of countless physics and engineering students.
Knowing that heated surfaces emit radiation (thermal energy), Fourier reasoned that the Earth would emit radiation absorbed by the Sun back into space – resulting in an icy planet. There must be something regulating the temperature – emitting enough thermal energy to keep the planet from freezing and overheating. Not too hot, not too cold.
Fourier’s answer to these questions is formalized in what we now call the greenhouse gas effect. From the American Institute of Physics history of climate change page:
How does the Earth’s blanket of air impede the outgoing heat radiation? Fourier tried to explain his insight by comparing the Earth with its covering of air to a box with a glass cover. That was a well-known experiment — the box's interior warms up when sunlight enters while the heat cannot escape. This was an over simple explanation, for it is quite different physics that keeps heat inside an actual glass box, or similarly in a greenhouse. (As Fourier knew, the main effect of the glass is to keep the air, heated by contact with sun-warmed surfaces, from wafting away. The glass does also keep heat radiation from escaping, but that's less important.) Nevertheless, people took up his analogy and trapping of heat by the atmosphere eventually came to be called "the greenhouse effect.
Again you don't even see it do you, you admitted that it started to happen before we put C02 with any amount of significance in the atmosphere..
.
.
Crap. It is really hard conversing with people as blind ignorant as you. Were there not the GHGs in the air, the oceans would be frozen down to the equator. At 180 ppm, the continental glaciers were south of our northern border. At 280 ppm, we are in the current interglacial. Now we are passing 410+ ppm. Were we to remain at just that level the Arctic would have no sea ice in the summer, and Greenland and Antarctica would have mountain glaciers, not a continental ice cap. But we will not stay at that level. We may double that before this century is out. And we really don't know what kind of results that will have, other than by present events, they will be a negative for most of humanity.
Please explain to us how the Earth loses heat through convEction or conduction.
Oh, I think he meant conviction. After all, the Earth just knows it has to lose heat because the great SSo DDumb said it has to.
Oh, I think he meant conviction. After all, the Earth just knows it has to lose heat because the great SSo DDumb said it has to.
Still waiting for you to tell me all about those intelligent particles and why they feel the need to behave differently when they are being observed than when they aren't being observed...and I am particularly interested in hearing about how they know they are being observed in the first place. Lets hear it rocks...tell us all about it.
My contention is that photons behave the way they do because they must...you believe that simply looking at particles prompts them to behave differently...which of us actually believes in intelligent particles?
