Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
Please show us your sources. Not a video, and actual source. Nobody is going to watch Coleman lie for 36 minutes. (He's burning in hell now for that, by the way. Yeah, he's not dead yet, but he's a special case.)
And then try to understand how grants works. Professors are legally prohibited from having any grant money go to heir salary, and all that money is tracked to the peny. That's why someone would have to be a total retard to claim scientists are in it for the grant money.
What you can't look it up for yourself?
The federal government — which will gain unprecedented regulatory power if climate legislation is passed — has funded scientific research to the tune of $32.5 billion since 1989
Mann, for example, has received some $6 million, mostly in government grants —
Summary
People flocked to the beach for respite one evening during Melbourne’s record breaking four-day heatwave in January 2014, under a sky made hazy by smoke from a scrub fire.by Neil O’Connor
Earth’s climate has changed over the past century. The atmosphere and oceans have warmed, sea levels have risen, and glaciers and ice sheets have decreased in size. The best available evidence indicates that greenhouse gas emissions from human activities are the main cause. Continuing increases in greenhouse gases will produce further warming and other changes in Earth’s physical environment and ecosystems.
The science behind these statements is supported by extensive studies based on four main lines of evidence:
This document aims to summarise and clarify the current scientific understanding of climate change by answering nine key questions.
- Physical principles established more than a century ago tell us that certain trace gases in the atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapour, restrict the radiant flow of heat from Earth to space. This mechanism, known as the ‘greenhouse effect’, keeps Earth’s surface and lower atmosphere considerably warmer than they would otherwise be. The gases involved are called ‘greenhouse gases’. An increase in greenhouse gas concentrations raises the temperature of the surface.
- The record of the distant past(millions of years) tells us that climate has varied greatly through Earth’s history. It has, for example, gone through ten major ice age cycles over approximately the past million years. Over the last few thousand years of this period, during which civilisations developed, climate was unusually stable. Evidence from the past confirms that climate can be sensitive to small persistent changes, such as variations in Earth’s orbit.
- Measurements from the recent past (the last 150 years) tell us that Earth’s surface has warmed as atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases increased through human activities, and that this warming has led to other environmental changes. Although climate varies from decade to decade, the overall upward trend of average global surface temperature over the last century is clear.
- Climate models allow us to understand the causes of past climate changes, and to project climate change into the future. Together with physical principles and knowledge of past variations, models provide compelling evidence that recent changes are due to increased greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere. They tell us that, unless greenhouse gas emissions are reduced greatly and greenhouse gas concentrations are stabilised, greenhouse warming will continue to increase.
Summary | Australian Academy of Science
Now that is what the Australian Academy of Science says, not three non-entities. Far from being laughed at, most Australian scientists state the global warming is real.
I asked you, little pissaholic. After all, it was your crazy claim. As usual, instead of backing it up, you deflected by lying.
So, you're actually now claiming that money spent to built a wind turbine goes into the pocket of scientist. Even for you, the sheer magnitude of the dishonesty there is rather shocking.
If all the facts didn't say you were an open fraud, you wouldn't have to lie about everything. But they do, so you do.
JoNova as a source? That's really scraping bottom.
We've got the world's real climate climate scientists as sources where you have nothing BUT fools like JoNova.
pissaholic?
Tell me hairball...which unbiased source do you think all of the hundreds upon hundreds of billions of dollars that are spent by the climate change community come from?
No answer? Or are you just to embarrassed to say where you think climate science gets its money from?
I asked you, little pissaholic. After all, it was your crazy claim. As usual, instead of backing it up, you deflected by lying.
The climate change industry is in excess of 1.5 trillion dollars per year...
So, you're actually now claiming that money spent to built a wind turbine goes into the pocket of scientist. Even for you, the sheer magnitude of the dishonesty there is rather shocking.
If all the facts didn't say you were an open fraud, you wouldn't have to lie about everything. But they do, so you do.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
No answer? Or are you just to embarrassed to say where you think climate science gets its money from?
I asked you, little pissaholic. After all, it was your crazy claim. As usual, instead of backing it up, you deflected by lying.
The climate change industry is in excess of 1.5 trillion dollars per year...
So, you're actually now claiming that money spent to built a wind turbine goes into the pocket of scientist. Even for you, the sheer magnitude of the dishonesty there is rather shocking.
If all the facts didn't say you were an open fraud, you wouldn't have to lie about everything. But they do, so you do.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
Stupidity on stupidity. The global warming 'scare' began about 1820, when Fourier pointed out that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat. That was confirmed in 1859 when Tyndall measured the absorption of IR by the GHGs in the atmosphere. Arrhenius quantified the amount of warming that doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere would create in 1896. Keeling started measuring the CO2 in 1957 on Mauna Loa. Now there are CO2 measuring stations all over the world recording the increase.
Does kinda make the alarmist contingent look silly.
No answer? Or are you just to embarrassed to say where you think climate science gets its money from?
I asked you, little pissaholic. After all, it was your crazy claim. As usual, instead of backing it up, you deflected by lying.
The climate change industry is in excess of 1.5 trillion dollars per year...
So, you're actually now claiming that money spent to built a wind turbine goes into the pocket of scientist. Even for you, the sheer magnitude of the dishonesty there is rather shocking.
If all the facts didn't say you were an open fraud, you wouldn't have to lie about everything. But they do, so you do.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
Stupidity on stupidity. The global warming 'scare' began about 1820, when Fourier pointed out that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat. That was confirmed in 1859 when Tyndall measured the absorption of IR by the GHGs in the atmosphere. Arrhenius quantified the amount of warming that doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere would create in 1896. Keeling started measuring the CO2 in 1957 on Mauna Loa. Now there are CO2 measuring stations all over the world recording the increase.
You've made some of your disgusting fetishes obvious, my sweet little predatory old faggot-stalker.
And by the way, you look like a total pussy for whining about namecalling after making it your staple tactic. Heat and kitchens, old faggot, heat and kitchens.
You're not even trying to discuss science anymore.You're just shrieking wilder and wilder conspiracy theories. According to what your cult leaders trickled down into your eager open throat, every satellite launched or wind turbine built is some kind of graft. It's desperate and pathetic, but what else do you have?
So, what's it like, knowing that weeping on a message board will be the high point of your day? That goes for the skook-bitch as well. Most hardcore deniers are clearly bitter losers at the game of life.
No answer? Or are you just to embarrassed to say where you think climate science gets its money from?
I asked you, little pissaholic. After all, it was your crazy claim. As usual, instead of backing it up, you deflected by lying.
The climate change industry is in excess of 1.5 trillion dollars per year...
So, you're actually now claiming that money spent to built a wind turbine goes into the pocket of scientist. Even for you, the sheer magnitude of the dishonesty there is rather shocking.
If all the facts didn't say you were an open fraud, you wouldn't have to lie about everything. But they do, so you do.
4.7 billion dollars in grant money in the U.S. alone.....
Stupidity on stupidity. The global warming 'scare' began about 1820, when Fourier pointed out that something in the atmosphere was absorbing outgoing heat. That was confirmed in 1859 when Tyndall measured the absorption of IR by the GHGs in the atmosphere. Arrhenius quantified the amount of warming that doubling the CO2 in the atmosphere would create in 1896. Keeling started measuring the CO2 in 1957 on Mauna Loa. Now there are CO2 measuring stations all over the world recording the increase.
