climate change rigging is a fact

[Abraham3]

Do you have as much evidence to support that statement as was brought forward to support the claim that we had all heard the death knell of American climate policy? Does it have as much evidence as the claim that the stolen and released emails CRU emails had turned hoards of the world's climate scientists against the IPCC? That the support for AGW among the world's science community was falling?

Eh?

 

[flacaltenn]

Do you have as much evidence to support that statement as was brought forward to support the claim that we had all heard the death knell of American climate policy? Does it have as much evidence as the claim that the stolen and released emails CRU emails had turned hoards of the world's climate scientists against the IPCC? That the support for AGW among the world's science community was falling?

Eh?

Oh c'mon Abelet.. Get off the hyped part of the statement and get to the nut. This is just how English Composition is taught for journalism. Build a lead that will get asses in seats thru the commercials. It's overweighted to declare it a "death knell".. But the lack of confidence due to the OBVIOUS AND BLATANT AND CONTINUOUS cooking of old temperature records IS gonna lead to more skepticism about daily, monthly, yearly temperature records that are declared every day of the year.

Folks are smarter than you think. They will realize all the monkey biz is so the warmer propaganda machine can keep declaring "unprecedented records" being set. It's easier to do that once you rewrite the HISTORICAL RECORDS...

 

[mamooth]

You understand that made no sense, right?

Oh, I'm sure it made sense to the cult, who speak their own special language to each other. But you need to convince people outside the cult. And that's going to be tough, given how denialists have been caught fudging so hard for so long. Everyone outside that cult now correctly assumes everything you do is filled with fudgy goodness from top to bottom.

To fix that, you'll have to spend time being honest equal to the amount of time you fudged. It takes that long to restore a reputation. About 10 years should get you started.

 

[SSDD]

You understand that made no sense, right?

Oh, I'm sure it made sense to the cult, who speak their own special language to each other. But you need to convince people outside the cult. And that's going to be tough, given how denialists have been caught fudging so hard for so long. Everyone outside that cult now correctly assumes everything you do is filled with fudgy goodness from top to bottom.

To fix that, you'll have to spend time being honest equal to the amount of time you fudged. It takes that long to restore a reputation. About 10 years should get you started.

You get more bitter every day don't you, you pissy old biddy?

 

[bripat9643]

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_January_2014_v5.61.png

January 2014. O.29, warmer than any month prior to 1998.

That's another way of saying that temperatures have been flat or declining since 1998.

 

[bripat9643]

It really bugs the kooks, how nobody outside of their cult cares at all about their 'tard conspiracy theories.

Go on, kooks, stamp those widdle feet and scream louder. That will show them you can't be ignored.

Hmmmm . . . . . . if you want to see a kook, look in the mirror. The kooks tend to overpopulate "the sky is falling" type movements.

 

[bripat9643]

http://www.ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19990042165_1999050125.pdf
from Hansen et al, 1999.


Abstract. We describe the current GISS analysis of surface temperature change based primarily on meteorological station measurements. The global surface temperature in 1998 was the warmest in the period of instrumental data. The rate of temperature change is higher in the past 25 years than at any previous time in the period of instrumental data. The warmth of 1998 is too large and pervasive to be fully accounted for by the recent El Nino, suggesting that global temperature may have moved to a higher level, analogous to the increase that occurred in the late 1970s. The warming in the United States over the past 50 years is smaller than in most of the world, and over that period there is a slight cooling trend in the Eastern United States and the neighboring Atlantic ocean. The spatial and temporal patterns of the temperature change suggest that more than one mechanism is involved in this regional cooling.
*********************************************

Note what ENSO did in 1998-2000.

What does posting data from the source whose credibility is being questioned prove?

 

[bripat9643]

Wait.. wait... you mean... you DON'T hear the death knell sounded for American climate policy?!?!?!?

Say it isn't so!

Not the death knell, but I can definitely hear the life support machines in the intensive care unit.

 

[Abraham3]

You hear nothing because the article to which the OP links is utterly worthless blogger bullshit and NO ONE outside a few fanatic deniers are paying it the least attention.

Any comment about the 98-99 ENSO? Think that might have caused temperatures to jump? Do the realtime reports of record high temperatures in 98 make it any harder for you to believe temperature data were fucked with ex post facto or had you made up your mind before you'd heard any facts?