Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Were that true, those technologies would and could flourish without massive subsidies to prop them up...The economic benefits would be readily be realized by people whose business it is to invest in such efficiency.No, they are arguing in favour of technologies which produce pollution.
Technologies which are outdated, inefficient and by and large easily replaceable by technologies which are cleaner, cheaper and will cost consumers less.
Speculation and begging the question are irrelevant and logically fallacious.Does anyone here seriously think any western country will be using coal in 2100?