Quit quoting ten pages that we all ain't reading
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I like to think that I'm not talking to just low attention span retards like you, eekthetroll.Quit quoting ten pages that we all ain't reading
More clueless nonsense and crackpot denier cult myths.The Wikipedia link, links to the IPCC report that said, Antarctica ice would be less, since this decade old wiki page was written the same ipcc scientists got stuck in Antarctica ice, expecting to prove the previous prediction that the ice was gone as they stated. AGW scientist are failing, as in if this was a class, the would not pass.
Thanks, CrazyFruitcake. Have you managed to jerk your head out of your butthole yet? I'm rooting for you, kid. You can do it if you try. Things will look a lot clearer to you then (and smell waaaaay better).Trolling Blunder! Welcome!!
I like to think that I'm not talking to just low attention span retards like you, eekthetroll.Quit quoting ten pages that we all ain't reading
More clueless nonsense and crackpot denier cult myths.The Wikipedia link, links to the IPCC report that said, Antarctica ice would be less, since this decade old wiki page was written the same ipcc scientists got stuck in Antarctica ice, expecting to prove the previous prediction that the ice was gone as they stated. AGW scientist are failing, as in if this was a class, the would not pass.
You post trivial nonsensical distractions like this so that you can try to ignore the content of those posts, which debunks your denier cult delusions.I like to think that I'm not talking to just low attention span retards like you, eekthetroll.Quit quoting ten pages that we all ain't reading
More clueless nonsense and crackpot denier cult myths.The Wikipedia link, links to the IPCC report that said, Antarctica ice would be less, since this decade old wiki page was written the same ipcc scientists got stuck in Antarctica ice, expecting to prove the previous prediction that the ice was gone as they stated. AGW scientist are failing, as in if this was a class, the would not pass.
Your reply just drips with intelligence, rolling thunder sounds more like falling blunder.
Seriously, 8 posts in a row in which each post contained paragraphs, go back to the page and scroll it, repeated quotes of the same post which is many paragraphs long to begin with becomes nothing less than retarded clutter, same level as trolling, ALL CAPS, flames, etc..
So, go back and take a good look at your mess, simply magnificent .
I did not comment on the content of your post idiot. I simply pointed out that re-posting something so long, so many times is dumb.You post trivial nonsensical distractions like this so that you can try to ignore the content of those posts, which debunks your denier cult delusions.I like to think that I'm not talking to just low attention span retards like you, eekthetroll.Quit quoting ten pages that we all ain't reading
More clueless nonsense and crackpot denier cult myths.The Wikipedia link, links to the IPCC report that said, Antarctica ice would be less, since this decade old wiki page was written the same ipcc scientists got stuck in Antarctica ice, expecting to prove the previous prediction that the ice was gone as they stated. AGW scientist are failing, as in if this was a class, the would not pass.
Your reply just drips with intelligence, rolling thunder sounds more like falling blunder.
Seriously, 8 posts in a row in which each post contained paragraphs, go back to the page and scroll it, repeated quotes of the same post which is many paragraphs long to begin with becomes nothing less than retarded clutter, same level as trolling, ALL CAPS, flames, etc..
So, go back and take a good look at your mess, simply magnificent .
I did not comment on the content of your post idiot. I simply pointed out that re-posting something so long, so many times is dumb.You post trivial nonsensical distractions like this so that you can try to ignore the content of those posts, which debunks your denier cult delusions.I like to think that I'm not talking to just low attention span retards like you, eekthetroll.Quit quoting ten pages that we all ain't reading
More clueless nonsense and crackpot denier cult myths.The Wikipedia link, links to the IPCC report that said, Antarctica ice would be less, since this decade old wiki page was written the same ipcc scientists got stuck in Antarctica ice, expecting to prove the previous prediction that the ice was gone as they stated. AGW scientist are failing, as in if this was a class, the would not pass.
Your reply just drips with intelligence, rolling thunder sounds more like falling blunder.
Seriously, 8 posts in a row in which each post contained paragraphs, go back to the page and scroll it, repeated quotes of the same post which is many paragraphs long to begin with becomes nothing less than retarded clutter, same level as trolling, ALL CAPS, flames, etc..
So, go back and take a good look at your mess, simply magnificent .
I am sure your position is solid, it's just the repeated delivery that sucks to scroll through, which will obscure good and points.
.
The new forum software seems to be handling the quotes differently. Usually, on most forums I've seen and also the way this place used to be, the number of old quotes that get included in every new post is very limited, so after a few exchanges, most of the older quotes are gone. Not so with USMB's new system. Plus it's squeezing them down in width and size so they are difficult to read. With that in mind, I'll try to remember to snip off the older or longer quotes and keep it more readable. Sometimes though the previous posts that are quoted give needed context.
.
The new forum software seems to be handling the quotes differently. Usually, on most forums I've seen and also the way this place used to be, the number of old quotes that get included in every new post is very limited, so after a few exchanges, most of the older quotes are gone. Not so with USMB's new system. Plus it's squeezing them down in width and size so they are difficult to read. With that in mind, I'll try to remember to snip off the older or longer quotes and keep it more readable. Sometimes though the previous posts that are quoted give needed context.
or, you could just go away and avoid the procedure. Seems you lack that skill.
why do you care? If it's all a lie like you say? What does it do to you?.
The new forum software seems to be handling the quotes differently. Usually, on most forums I've seen and also the way this place used to be, the number of old quotes that get included in every new post is very limited, so after a few exchanges, most of the older quotes are gone. Not so with USMB's new system. Plus it's squeezing them down in width and size so they are difficult to read. With that in mind, I'll try to remember to snip off the older or longer quotes and keep it more readable. Sometimes though the previous posts that are quoted give needed context.
or, you could just go away and avoid the procedure. Seems you lack that skill.
But then there'd be no one to debunk the lies and bullcrap you spew daily, JustCrazy.
Not surprising that you would be so clueless about that, JustCrazy.why do you care? If it's all a lie like you say? What does it do to you?.
The new forum software seems to be handling the quotes differently. Usually, on most forums I've seen and also the way this place used to be, the number of old quotes that get included in every new post is very limited, so after a few exchanges, most of the older quotes are gone. Not so with USMB's new system. Plus it's squeezing them down in width and size so they are difficult to read. With that in mind, I'll try to remember to snip off the older or longer quotes and keep it more readable. Sometimes though the previous posts that are quoted give needed context.
or, you could just go away and avoid the procedure. Seems you lack that skill.
But then there'd be no one to debunk the lies and bullcrap you spew daily, JustCrazy.
I'm not clueless of a thing. I see what you're about, a paid message board troller. And LoSiNgNot surprising that you would be so clueless about that, JustCrazy.why do you care? If it's all a lie like you say? What does it do to you?.
The new forum software seems to be handling the quotes differently. Usually, on most forums I've seen and also the way this place used to be, the number of old quotes that get included in every new post is very limited, so after a few exchanges, most of the older quotes are gone. Not so with USMB's new system. Plus it's squeezing them down in width and size so they are difficult to read. With that in mind, I'll try to remember to snip off the older or longer quotes and keep it more readable. Sometimes though the previous posts that are quoted give needed context.
or, you could just go away and avoid the procedure. Seems you lack that skill.
But then there'd be no one to debunk the lies and bullcrap you spew daily, JustCrazy.
LOLOL....so says the retarded reality denier whose fraudulent drivel gets debunked daily.I'm not clueless of a thing. I see what you're about, a paid message board troller. And losingNot surprising that you would be so clueless about that, JustCrazy.why do you care? If it's all a lie like you say? What does it do to you?But then there'd be no one to debunk the lies and bullcrap you spew daily, JustCrazy.
yet you're still................wait for it.......................LoSiNgLOLOL....so says the retarded reality denier whose fraudulent drivel gets debunked daily.I'm not clueless of a thing. I see what you're about, a paid message board troller. And losingNot surprising that you would be so clueless about that, JustCrazy.why do you care? If it's all a lie like you say? What does it do to you?But then there'd be no one to debunk the lies and bullcrap you spew daily, JustCrazy.
Nope.yet you're still................wait for it.......................LoSiNgLOLOL....so says the retarded reality denier whose fraudulent drivel gets debunked daily.I'm not clueless of a thing. I see what you're about, a paid message board troller. And losingNot surprising that you would be so clueless about that, JustCrazy.why do you care? If it's all a lie like you say? What does it do to you?But then there'd be no one to debunk the lies and bullcrap you spew daily, JustCrazy.
Nope.yet you're still................wait for it.......................LoSiNgLOLOL....so says the retarded reality denier whose fraudulent drivel gets debunked daily.I'm not clueless of a thing. I see what you're about, a paid message board troller. And losingNot surprising that you would be so clueless about that, JustCrazy.why do you care? If it's all a lie like you say? What does it do to you?But then there'd be no one to debunk the lies and bullcrap you spew daily, JustCrazy.
Instead, you're still an insane and very delusional retard who has no idea what is happening. You're just plain too stupid to realize that you and your twisted little cult of reality denial are the ones losing....the debate, your minds, and any connection to reality you may once have had.
Nope.yet you're still................wait for it......................losingLOLOL....so says the retarded reality denier whose fraudulent drivel gets debunked daily.I'm not clueless of a thing. I see what you're about, a paid message board troller. And losingNot surprising that you would be so clueless about that, JustCrazy.why do you care? If it's all a lie like you say? What does it do to you?But then there'd be no one to debunk the lies and bullcrap you spew daily, JustCrazy.
Instead, you're still an insane and very delusional retard who has no idea what is happening. You're just plain too stupid to realize that you and your twisted little cult of reality denial are the ones losing....the debate, your minds, and any connection to reality you may once have had.
I'm someone who doesn't have to resort to name calling to make a point. However, that doesn't mean you're not losing........