Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The rich have always acted like "dicks" but the pop culture fools educated by union teachers got to pick the dicks they liked during the late 20th and early 21 century and those dicks usually were decadent drug addicted nut cases. Democrats have been playing the little socialist game since FDR refered to Joe Stalin as "uncle Joe" and the joke was that there were more communists in the administration than the Kremlin. Radical democrats absolutely hate to be out of power so they will play any game and step on any tradition and pretty much try to ruin anyone who gets in their way including the majority of the American people.
. . . In this demographic 76 are indifferent to Romney’s wealth, 19 percent say it makes them less likely to vote for him, and 4 percent say it makes them more likely to vote for him.
You are one of the biggest Libtards on the website.
NO, I'm just not subscribing to the crazy that's taken over the GOP in the last decade.
The one that's cause you to lose 4 out of the last five Presidential elections.
wonder why Cons were so obsessed with John kerry for being rich and with his money and his and teresa heinz's tax returns?
that was different because he was a democrat.
10 bucks says the OP made an issue out of it back in the day. Seeing how she is tabloid trash.
We weren't obsessed with his wife being rich. We took issue primarily with his shitty post Vietnam antics. We have no issues with rich people, just rich people who bash people for being rich... it's called hypocrisy.
You are one of the biggest Libtards on the website.
NO, I'm just not subscribing to the crazy that's taken over the GOP in the last decade.
The one that's cause you to lose 4 out of the last five Presidential elections.
Uhhh Joe??? Yer math SUX!!!
Being rich used to be a good thing before Barry Hussein's mini socialist revolution. FDR was arguably the richest president in history and lefties love his legacy. JFK came from a line of pop-culture new money from rum-running and Hollywood decadence and the left called it "Camelot". Today we have a former dope dealing community activists in the White House and left tells us to tighten our belts and sooner or later we will all be working for the peoples republic if we don't elect a capitalist dog.
Being rich used to be a good thing when the rich didn't act like dicks.
When they didn't get draft deferments while poor people's kids went to wars.
When they used their wealth to open factories and create jobs, not to shut down factories and destroy jobs.
A wise rich guy, Henry Ford, once said, "If my employees don't make enough to buy my products, I don't have a business."
Mitt Romney is not that kind of rich guy.
NO, I'm just not subscribing to the crazy that's taken over the GOP in the last decade.
The one that's cause you to lose 4 out of the last five Presidential elections.
Uhhh Joe??? Yer math SUX!!!
Uh, no, it doesn't.
1992- Clinton won.
1996- Clinton won.
2000- Gore won the POPULAR vote. That the courts stole it was sort of meaningless. Fact is, Gore won the vote. Probably won a majority in Florida, too, if someone had bothered to count the vote.
2004- Bush actually won that one- barely. Incumbant President, during a war, awful opponent, massively outspent, and he won by a whopping 2%, the lowest victory margin an incumbant got since 1916.
2008- Obama won, with the greatest number of votes anyone had ever gotten in history.
Not to worry. It will be 5 out of six.
Being rich used to be a good thing before Barry Hussein's mini socialist revolution. FDR was arguably the richest president in history and lefties love his legacy. JFK came from a line of pop-culture new money from rum-running and Hollywood decadence and the left called it "Camelot". Today we have a former dope dealing community activists in the White House and left tells us to tighten our belts and sooner or later we will all be working for the peoples republic if we don't elect a capitalist dog.
Being rich used to be a good thing when the rich didn't act like dicks.
When they didn't get draft deferments while poor people's kids went to wars.
When they used their wealth to open factories and create jobs, not to shut down factories and destroy jobs.
A wise rich guy, Henry Ford, once said, "If my employees don't make enough to buy my products, I don't have a business."
Mitt Romney is not that kind of rich guy.
He saved companies like Staples and Home Depot. And I would much rather vote for a man who has a success record in business than a failed record as president.
Uhhh Joe??? Yer math SUX!!!
Uh, no, it doesn't.
1992- Clinton won.
1996- Clinton won.
2000- Gore won the POPULAR vote. That the courts stole it was sort of meaningless. Fact is, Gore won the vote. Probably won a majority in Florida, too, if someone had bothered to count the vote.
2004- Bush actually won that one- barely. Incumbant President, during a war, awful opponent, massively outspent, and he won by a whopping 2%, the lowest victory margin an incumbant got since 1916.
2008- Obama won, with the greatest number of votes anyone had ever gotten in history.
Not to worry. It will be 5 out of six.
Remember Kennedy won with a low margin as well.
Class warfare is gay. Never wins elections as a campaign strategy. Incumbents under 50% always lose. The economy sucks balls. Hope and Change = a joke. Just hoping all the k00ks show up in here on election night!!!
Uh, no, it doesn't.
1992- Clinton won.
1996- Clinton won.
2000- Gore won the POPULAR vote. That the courts stole it was sort of meaningless. Fact is, Gore won the vote. Probably won a majority in Florida, too, if someone had bothered to count the vote.
2004- Bush actually won that one- barely. Incumbant President, during a war, awful opponent, massively outspent, and he won by a whopping 2%, the lowest victory margin an incumbant got since 1916.
2008- Obama won, with the greatest number of votes anyone had ever gotten in history.
Not to worry. It will be 5 out of six.
Remember Kennedy won with a low margin as well.
Not relevent to my original point, but okay.
Here's the thing. If you look at history, one party dominates.
From 1861-1932, the GOP dominated the electoral scene. The Democrats won with Cleveland and Wilson- barely- but mostly, it was the GOP in walks. Then the Great Depression hit, and that was the end of GOP dominance.
From 1932-1968, the Democrats dominated. The only Republican winner in that lot was Eisenhower, who essentially had to admit the Democrats were right about the role of government and foreign affairs, embracing Keynesian economics and rejecting isolationism.
The ground shifted again in 1968 thanks to the Damned Hippies. Republicans got the White Middle Class back by playing on their fears. So from 1968-1992, the only winner the Democrats had was Jimmy Carter, who was disliked by Democrats because he was practically a Republican. And he only barely won after Watergate decimated Republican leadership. If Ford hadn't pardoned Nixon, he'd have probably won.
1992 the ground shifted again. Minorities became a larger slice of the pie, and suburban voters started turning back to the Democrats. So Clinton won. Gore should have won, but the court stole the election, and Obama won and will win again. Only because Bush stole the election in 2000 and we've never voted out a president in wartime, did Bush win- barely.
