Communists benefit the most from open-borders; so this is a shock to me:
Why would Communists put the knock on their guy over mass migration? The only answer that makes sense to me is that Communists want to give Taqiyya the Liar cover for the most effective method yet devised to abolish national borders. His Arab Spring was rooted in immigration. Killing Qaddafi opened the floodgates:
The lesson learned
There is no better way to trigger mass migration than to create civil war. New World Order scum were disappointed when Clinton’s Balkan Adventures did not create a tidal wave of refugees fleeing across Europe from country to country. Failure in Kosovo taught the United Nations that civil wars in the Middle East would create a flood of refugees seeking political asylum worldwide.
Mass migration also explains why the Chicago sewer rat is reluctant to end violence in the Middle East, or in this country for that matter.
NOTE: Libya and Syria are great success stories to the United Nations. Naturally, media horror stories were not behind the first refugee:
Question: Who is cruel enough to turn away hungry children? Answer: Nobody —— the United Nations counts on touchy-feely stupidity. Never mind that erasing national borders is for the greater good according to global government scum. God forbid that anybody lays the deaths and cruelty on the murderers in our own government for creating civil wars to further their political agenda.
Finally, the swamp creatures in the State Department know that Americans oppose being dragged into a civil war in a foreign country. That is one policy those filthy bums have right. Conversely, our government starting civil wars is dead wrong. So where the hell are the peaceniks on this one?
Shocker: Communists blame Obama for Europe's immigration crisis
Posted By Aaron Klein On 09/02/2015 @ 6:20 pm
Shocker: Communists blame Obama for Europe’s immigration crisis
Posted By Aaron Klein On 09/02/2015 @ 6:20 pm
Shocker: Communists blame Obama for Europe’s immigration crisis
Why would Communists put the knock on their guy over mass migration? The only answer that makes sense to me is that Communists want to give Taqiyya the Liar cover for the most effective method yet devised to abolish national borders. His Arab Spring was rooted in immigration. Killing Qaddafi opened the floodgates:
Given the Middle East’s disintegration and sub-Saharan Africa’s general dysfunction, this means that Europe is at the mercy of the countries to its immediate south. So long as Qaddafi kept order in Libya and Turkey was willing to contain most of the Middle Easterners trying to pass through, a spineless Europe could maintain the façade of immigration limits. There was a lot of immigration even then, but the heat rose slowly enough that the frog, while increasingly restless, had not yet been induced to jump out of the pot.
The only other country immediately to our south is Cuba, which holds the possibility of turning into our Libya. I don’t like the Castros any more than Qaddafi, but we might miss them when they’re gone if Cuba’s government unravels, the cartels establish a presence, and illegal aliens from around the world use the island as a jumping-off point. Which is why we’d be foolish to ever give up Guantanamo — we’re going to need somewhere to drop off the illegal aliens that’s not on U.S. soil.
The recent examples of Australia and Israel suggest that advanced democracies are indeed capable of stopping uncontrolled immigration from the Third World. Whether Europe and the United States are up to the challenge remains to be seen.
XXXXX
The only other country immediately to our south is Cuba, which holds the possibility of turning into our Libya. I don’t like the Castros any more than Qaddafi, but we might miss them when they’re gone if Cuba’s government unravels, the cartels establish a presence, and illegal aliens from around the world use the island as a jumping-off point. Which is why we’d be foolish to ever give up Guantanamo — we’re going to need somewhere to drop off the illegal aliens that’s not on U.S. soil.
The recent examples of Australia and Israel suggest that advanced democracies are indeed capable of stopping uncontrolled immigration from the Third World. Whether Europe and the United States are up to the challenge remains to be seen.
Where There Is No Border, the Nations Perish
By Mark Krikorian — September 1, 2015
No Borders – Nations Perish | National Review Online
By Mark Krikorian — September 1, 2015
No Borders – Nations Perish | National Review Online
The lesson learned
There is no better way to trigger mass migration than to create civil war. New World Order scum were disappointed when Clinton’s Balkan Adventures did not create a tidal wave of refugees fleeing across Europe from country to country. Failure in Kosovo taught the United Nations that civil wars in the Middle East would create a flood of refugees seeking political asylum worldwide.
Mass migration also explains why the Chicago sewer rat is reluctant to end violence in the Middle East, or in this country for that matter.
NOTE: Libya and Syria are great success stories to the United Nations. Naturally, media horror stories were not behind the first refugee:
On Wednesday, refugees in the Hungarian capital held up scraps of paper: “Help Syrians,” they read. “Babies are tired.”
Still, almost anything — even this — is better than the chaos and killing from which they have fled: in Syria, where cities lie in rubble; in South Sudan, ravaged by war and poverty; in Libya, where warlords maraud and people suffer; in Iraq, where ISIS likes to videotape its slaughter of innocents.
Still, almost anything — even this — is better than the chaos and killing from which they have fled: in Syria, where cities lie in rubble; in South Sudan, ravaged by war and poverty; in Libya, where warlords maraud and people suffer; in Iraq, where ISIS likes to videotape its slaughter of innocents.
No food, no sleep, waves of migrants pile into Munich
By Ed Payne and Ray Sanchez, CNN
Updated 6:07 PM ET, Wed September 2, 2015
European ministers huddle on migrant crisis - CNN.com
By Ed Payne and Ray Sanchez, CNN
Updated 6:07 PM ET, Wed September 2, 2015
European ministers huddle on migrant crisis - CNN.com
Question: Who is cruel enough to turn away hungry children? Answer: Nobody —— the United Nations counts on touchy-feely stupidity. Never mind that erasing national borders is for the greater good according to global government scum. God forbid that anybody lays the deaths and cruelty on the murderers in our own government for creating civil wars to further their political agenda.
Finally, the swamp creatures in the State Department know that Americans oppose being dragged into a civil war in a foreign country. That is one policy those filthy bums have right. Conversely, our government starting civil wars is dead wrong. So where the hell are the peaceniks on this one?