Cincinnati says huge conspiracy against blacks in city. Starts massive quota-hiring system

Oh I see, he blames the illegals and I'm racist!

I say he blames it on hispanics and you bring up blacks vs hispanics getting jobs.

Then after you see arguments that are not there you call ME a retard. Thats rich

You are a retard. Otherwise you would understand how black market labor is preventing legal labor from getting employment in massive numbers.

But now that is racist of me to point out?

See, that is another example of what I am talking about when I say that you are a racist fool being played by corporate interests.

I might understand that but since we're not talking about that at all.....

Well, while we fight and fuss over stupid shit like blatant racial discrimination in these set asides, corporate lobbyists are pressing Congress to let in more H1-B visa serfs and are log jamming any effort at resolving the black market labor problems.

So the fact that you don't see how that *is* what we are talking about from a integrally related perspective is interesting.

Why CEO salaries more than 300 times the average salary of the employees is another problem I guess you cant see? Or the Quantitative Easing Program that gave over $4 trillion in bailouts to Wall Street banks? Or the corporate off shoring of jobs?

roflmao, dude why is that all in your political blind spot?
 
When it comes to opportunity, it is not a pie; it is not limited. Opportunity is unlimited. All you have to do is seize it.

In theory it is unlimited. The reality is that there are not that many jobs out there.
 
caption is an idiot, as usual.

Any system that says "you MUST give preference to minorities" is equally as racist as any policy that says not to consider minorities.

Suure! Its super racist! lol


Oh the horrible terrible life of a victimized white man...When will the world understand such turmoil?

What you are essentially saying is that you are okay with racism towards whites because whites have had the advantage for so long.

That is stupid, and dangerous thinking.

Yeah, I'm saying whites have had the whole pie for so long that it would be unfair at this point to give other people a shot at that pie. Just let the white people keep it, dont want them to cry about injustice or anything lol
When it comes to opportunity, it is not a pie; it is not limited. Opportunity is unlimited. All you have to do is seize it. To not take that opportunity is to waste the efforts of the earlier generations who didn't have equal opportunity.

If that was true whites wouldnt have spent the last god knows how many years holding people down with the force of govt. Their actions suggest thats not true
 
If that was true whites wouldnt have spent the last god knows how many years holding people down with the force of govt. Their actions suggest thats not true

You mean like all those evil whites that fought in the Union Army in the Civil War to end slavery? They were setting them free in order to suppress them?

roflmao.
 
Good! Now instead of the entire pie white people have to give slices to other groups. But they cry and say "but this isnt fair! I used to get a WHOLE PIE to myself!!!"

Woe is me....Woooooe

But here is the thing. Some people do a better job eating that pie and are more qualified to eat it. Should someone who can't chew....get pie?

Depends are you talking about fairness or greed?

What is "fair" about being forced to hire a company that is NOT the best qualified? The better run company and more successful one....gets passed over simply because they are white?? Is that "fair"?

If your body gets all screwed up with cancer and heart and brai.n issues....and you need 10 medical specialists....what would you say if your insurance company said "Hey...we know the 10 best doctors. BUUUT....they're all white. We're gonna take 4 out and replace them with some diverse doctors. Not as qualified....but it's only fair."

Would you be ok with that?
 
Damn white supremacy still keeping the brothers down.......

Lmfao

When did it stop?

Even as we discuss how an entire city is discriminating against white males in hiring contracts and set asides, you still insist that the white man is holding the brothers back?

:laugh::laugh2::laugh::laugh2::lame2::laugh2::laugh::laugh2::laugh::lame2::laugh2::laugh::laugh2::laugh::lmao::lmao::lol::lmao::laugh2::laugh::lol::lmao::laugh2::lame2::laugh2::lmao::lmao::lol::laugh::laugh::laugh:



If they say the white man is holding the black man down....then I have a question.

Barack Obama. Oprah Whinfrey. Ben Carson. Colin Powell. Denzel Washington. Jay Z. Tim Scott.

Some extremely successful black Americans right?

Well....WHICH white men allowed them to be great? If we hold them down....then obviously their success can ONLY BE credited to the White men who allowed it to happen.
 
caption is an idiot, as usual.

Any system that says "you MUST give preference to minorities" is equally as racist as any policy that says not to consider minorities.

Suure! Its super racist! lol


Oh the horrible terrible life of a victimized white man...When will the world understand such turmoil?

What you are essentially saying is that you are okay with racism towards whites because whites have had the advantage for so long.

That is stupid, and dangerous thinking.

Yeah, I'm saying whites have had the whole pie for so long that it would be unfair at this point to give other people a shot at that pie. Just let the white people keep it, dont want them to cry about injustice or anything lol

no one is preventing anyone from "having a shot"...
Hiring should be based on skills, knowledge and aptitude...NOT government mandated preference to minorities, regardless of qualification, just because of the color of their skin.
 
caption is an idiot, as usual.

Any system that says "you MUST give preference to minorities" is equally as racist as any policy that says not to consider minorities.

Suure! Its super racist! lol


Oh the horrible terrible life of a victimized white man...When will the world understand such turmoil?

What you are essentially saying is that you are okay with racism towards whites because whites have had the advantage for so long.

That is stupid, and dangerous thinking.

Yeah, I'm saying whites have had the whole pie for so long that it would be unfair at this point to give other people a shot at that pie. Just let the white people keep it, dont want them to cry about injustice or anything lol

no one is preventing anyone from "having a shot"...
Hiring should be based on skills, knowledge and aptitude...NOT government mandated preference to minorities, regardless of qualification, just because of the color of their skin.

I don't think they are pushing for hiring minorities who are unqualified, I think they are pushing for ignoring qualified white people while they look for qualified minorities. I mean that's still illegal tho...
 
caption is an idiot, as usual.

Any system that says "you MUST give preference to minorities" is equally as racist as any policy that says not to consider minorities.

Suure! Its super racist! lol


Oh the horrible terrible life of a victimized white man...When will the world understand such turmoil?

What you are essentially saying is that you are okay with racism towards whites because whites have had the advantage for so long.

That is stupid, and dangerous thinking.

Yeah, I'm saying whites have had the whole pie for so long that it would be unfair at this point to give other people a shot at that pie. Just let the white people keep it, dont want them to cry about injustice or anything lol


So you don't want to have an actual discussion, got it.

how many times do I have to say it, white people had whole pie. Now they have less pie. Cries uncontrollably

you "get" what you earn..That's why white people lead the way in achievements, inventions and accomplishment

this is just the standard racial solidarity/revenge that negroes practice once they become a majority in a city...
think "detroit"
 
caption is an idiot, as usual.

Any system that says "you MUST give preference to minorities" is equally as racist as any policy that says not to consider minorities.

Suure! Its super racist! lol


Oh the horrible terrible life of a victimized white man...When will the world understand such turmoil?

What you are essentially saying is that you are okay with racism towards whites because whites have had the advantage for so long.

That is stupid, and dangerous thinking.

Yeah, I'm saying whites have had the whole pie for so long that it would be unfair at this point to give other people a shot at that pie. Just let the white people keep it, dont want them to cry about injustice or anything lol

no one is preventing anyone from "having a shot"...
Hiring should be based on skills, knowledge and aptitude...NOT government mandated preference to minorities, regardless of qualification, just because of the color of their skin.

I don't think they are pushing for hiring minorities who are unqualified, I think they are pushing for ignoring qualified white people while they look for qualified minorities. I mean that's still illegal tho...

right.we may never know..it doesn't matter anyway...just as long as it isn't a white person that's all that matters to negroes.....they're aiming for mediocrity rather than excellence.

If one has a plowhorse and a race horse and they cripple the racehorse so he's no faster than the plowhorse, they haven't ELEVATED the plowhorse into a racehorse or made them "equal".....they've artificially lowered the standards in order to achieve a false "equality".
 
Again, the law DOES give equal standing to whites. Since whites have never treated anyone else equally those people SHOULD be given more special treatment since they received special treatment of not being able to vote, have rights or be employed.

A society that has done something special against the Negro for hundreds of years must now do something special for the Negro." - Martin Luther King Jr.

michael "martin luther" king was a plagiarist whose degree was almost rescinded but it was decided that since he was a negro it would be ok to let him slide.... he was a fake "preacher" who was married and consorted with prostitutes while pretending to be a man of "god"...

Martin Luther King, Jr. - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s papers were donated by his wife Coretta Scott King to Stanford University's King Papers Project. During the late 1980s, as the papers were being organized and catalogued, the staff of the project discovered that King's doctoral dissertation at Boston University, titled A Comparison of the Conception of God in the Thinking of Paul Tillich and Henry Nelson Wieman, included large sections from a dissertation written by another student (Jack Boozer) three years earlier at Boston University.[1][2]

As Clayborne Carson, director of the King Papers Project at Stanford University, has written, "instances of textual appropriation can be seen in his earliest extant writings as well as his dissertation. The pattern is also noticeable in his speeches and sermons throughout his career."[3]

Boston University, where King received his Ph.D. in systematic theology, conducted an investigation that found he plagiarized major portions of his doctoral thesis from various other authors who wrote about the topic.[4][5]

According to civil rights historian Ralph E. Luker, who worked on the King Papers Project directing the research on King's early life, King's paper The Chief Characteristics and Doctrines of Mahayana Buddhism[6] was taken almost entirely from secondary sources.[7] He writes:

Moreover, the farther King went in his academic career, the more deeply ingrained the patterns of borrowing language without clear attribution became. Thus, the plagiarism in his dissertation seemed to be, by then, the product of his long-established practice.[7]

The incident was first reported in the December 3, 1989 edition of the Sunday Telegraph by Frank Johnson, titled "Martin Luther King—Was He a Plagiarist?" The incident was then reported in U.S. in the November 9, 1990 edition of the Wall Street Journal, under the title of "To Their Dismay, King Scholars Find a Troubling Pattern." Several other newspapers then followed with stories, including the Boston Globe and the New York Times. Numerous newspaper editorials defended King, saying he was still a great man regardless of his academic fraud.[citation needed]

Boston University decided not to revoke his doctorate, saying that although King acted improperly, his dissertation still "makes an intelligent contribution to scholarship." However, a letter is now attached to King's dissertation in the university library, noting that numerous passages were included without the appropriate quotations and citations of sources.[1][8][9]
 
No because its bullshit that pretends whites are discriminated against in the first place.

So you refuse to answer this simple question about what the law SHOULD be?

The law DOES give equal standing (and more than equal) to whites currently.

It is simple enough that even you could understand it, but since you wont answer, it would appear that you don't want to admit that you think the law should discriminate against white males.

But just to be fair and give you a chance, do you believe that white males should have equal standing in our legal system or not?

Again, the law DOES give equal standing to whites. Since whites have never treated anyone else equally those people SHOULD be given more special treatment since they received special treatment of not being able to vote, have rights or be employed.

So how do white males have equal standing in our courts of law if laws like the racist set aside laws are part of our legal system? How are white males equal to those who are 'special' as you put it? If one group is special then the groups cannot be equal by definition, it seems to me. How do you explain it?


Today in america, everyone is assigned a legally-enforceable racial category by the government.

Rights and privileges are then granted or denied based on one's racial membership, with non-whites given preferences over whites.
The federal government does this, of course, in the name of "anti-racism".
 
Suure! Its super racist! lol


Oh the horrible terrible life of a victimized white man...When will the world understand such turmoil?

What you are essentially saying is that you are okay with racism towards whites because whites have had the advantage for so long.

That is stupid, and dangerous thinking.

Yeah, I'm saying whites have had the whole pie for so long that it would be unfair at this point to give other people a shot at that pie. Just let the white people keep it, dont want them to cry about injustice or anything lol


So you don't want to have an actual discussion, got it.

how many times do I have to say it, white people had whole pie. Now they have less pie. Cries uncontrollably

you "get" what you earn..That's why white people lead the way in achievements, inventions and accomplishment

this is just the standard racial solidarity/revenge that negroes practice once they become a majority in a city...
think "detroit"
That's some backwards logic for ya.

Block blacks from jobs making then unable to earn. Then state you get what you earn.
 
What you are essentially saying is that you are okay with racism towards whites because whites have had the advantage for so long.

That is stupid, and dangerous thinking.

Yeah, I'm saying whites have had the whole pie for so long that it would be unfair at this point to give other people a shot at that pie. Just let the white people keep it, dont want them to cry about injustice or anything lol


So you don't want to have an actual discussion, got it.

how many times do I have to say it, white people had whole pie. Now they have less pie. Cries uncontrollably

you "get" what you earn..That's why white people lead the way in achievements, inventions and accomplishment

this is just the standard racial solidarity/revenge that negroes practice once they become a majority in a city...
think "detroit"
That's some backwards logic for ya.

Block blacks from jobs making then unable to earn. Then state you get what you earn.

no one is blocking negroes from anything...they got free run of the city of detroit...historically they simply aren't able to create an organized form of government or a first world nation .....or even MAINTAIN one when it's HANDED to them ...like detroit....or ferguson...
 
What you are essentially saying is that you are okay with racism towards whites because whites have had the advantage for so long.

That is stupid, and dangerous thinking.

Yeah, I'm saying whites have had the whole pie for so long that it would be unfair at this point to give other people a shot at that pie. Just let the white people keep it, dont want them to cry about injustice or anything lol


So you don't want to have an actual discussion, got it.

how many times do I have to say it, white people had whole pie. Now they have less pie. Cries uncontrollably

you "get" what you earn..That's why white people lead the way in achievements, inventions and accomplishment

this is just the standard racial solidarity/revenge that negroes practice once they become a majority in a city...
think "detroit"
That's some backwards logic for ya.

Block blacks from jobs making then unable to earn. Then state you get what you earn.

Who is blocking blacks from a job? If you can make an employer more money than the next guy....or if your product/service is the best of the available ones....you're guaranteed a job in America. Sort of. If you do all that and you're white...they may force you to step aside to be fair to less qualified person or lesser product.
 

Forum List

Back
Top