CIA chief warns: Wikileaks is plotting to take down America any way they can

Wikileaks hates the U.S. That's why they worked to get Trump elected.
Wiki doesn't hide their bias at all...
Neither does Robert Mueller and his Clinton Lawyers. I think the Democrats are going to have serious regrets about their move to falsely the man who has the backbone to bring them all down. They are going to fall into the ditch they dug for President Trump. Call it a case of divine justice.
Why divine? Will Jesus anoint and wash the feet of the victorious elected?
The wicked knew their day was coming. No sense crying over spilled milk. What's done is done.
 
Wikileaks hates the U.S. That's why they worked to get Trump elected.
Wiki doesn't hide their bias at all...
Neither does Robert Mueller and his Clinton Lawyers. I think the Democrats are going to have serious regrets about their move to falsely the man who has the backbone to bring them all down. They are going to fall into the ditch they dug for President Trump. Call it a case of divine justice.
Why divine? Will Jesus anoint and wash the feet of the victorious elected?
The wicked knew their day was coming. No sense crying over spilled milk. What's done is done.

I don't cry for anyone, what they make is for them to live with...I have my own life to live in..
 
Wikileaks hates the U.S. That's why they worked to get Trump elected.
Wiki doesn't hide their bias at all...
Neither does Robert Mueller and his Clinton Lawyers. I think the Democrats are going to have serious regrets about their move to falsely the man who has the backbone to bring them all down. They are going to fall into the ditch they dug for President Trump. Call it a case of divine justice.
Why divine? Will Jesus anoint and wash the feet of the victorious elected?
The wicked knew their day was coming. No sense crying over spilled milk. What's done is done.

I don't cry for anyone, what they make is for them to live with...I have my own life to live in..
You must be living in your own world as well. Civil asset forfeiture skyrocketed under the Obama administration. He seized billions in assets and continued to do so throughout his administration. He didn't call for an end until the final year of his term (or Holder's) and that was because he didn't want the law used against him and his criminal friends after he left (most likely).
Civil Asset Forfeiture Skyrocketed Under Obama
 
Why are you worried about the Clintons, Podesta brothers, Obama and Soros losing everything they have? If ever there was a good purpose for this law - this is it!
 
Just to be sure I understand. The biggest threat that this nation faces is not Terrorists. It is not Russia, the Chinese, North Koreans, or even some international criminal organization. It is Wikileaks. Seriously?

Does Wikileaks have the ability to infiltrate spies into our intelligence apparatus? No? Well. Does Wikileaks have the ability to plant spy submarines off our coast and watch what they could see much more cheaply by renting an apartment near the base they are watching? No? Hmmm.

What can Wikileaks do to us? Well. When one of our people who have access, and have been throughly vetted read some things that they don't like, Wikileaks can get it when this trusted person sends it to them, and post it online for others to read.

How awful. How terrible. How not a threat can you possibly get? Wikileaks doesn't do a damned thing but post what the sources send them. Don't want leaks, don't have so many god damned people involved in spying on every fucking thing that everyone does. Or you could just decide that this billions of dollars we are spending on Homeland Insecurity is wasted money. The people would probably get more out of the money if you set it on fire during some patriotic display. Fireworks and burning cash. How grand.
 
Why are you worried about the Clintons, Podesta brothers, Obama and Soros losing everything they have? If ever there was a good purpose for this law - this is it!
^ :cuckoo:
You're the one flashing hail Satan hand signs in your avatar and you call me crazy? Look in the mirror. Better yet why not explain why your little Lucifer worshipping comrade lost the election? It isn't like she (and everyone in collusion with her including MSM) didn't break every law in the book to win and yet at the end of it all? She loses. One would think you people would figure out by name that it is God that is in full control and not the defeated foe you're all bowing down to. Time for you to switch sides, Blackflag. You're on the losing team.
 
Why are you worried about the Clintons, Podesta brothers, Obama and Soros losing everything they have? If ever there was a good purpose for this law - this is it!
^ :cuckoo:
You're the one flashing hail Satan hand signs in your avatar and you call me crazy? Look in the mirror. Better yet why not explain why your little Lucifer worshipping comrade lost the election? It isn't like she (and everyone in collusion with her including MSM) didn't break every law in the book to win and yet at the end of it all? She loses. One would think you people would figure out by name that it is God that is in full control and not the defeated foe you're all bowing down to. Time for you to switch sides, Blackflag. You're on the losing team.
Then God elected Obama. Good to know.
 
Haven't they already and the consensus is they did nothing criminally wrong. We now have Russia gate to concentrate on since Trump is a Russian plant.
Bullshit but I am sure you will want people to keep looking in one direction while others attempt to sneak their bullshit in from another direction.

Its 2017 and we have a crooked President, News flash Clinton did not win the EC, and Trump himself said the Clintons are good people. Lock her up was only for the rallies he said , he said give it up now, since he became Pres. So time to quit this Clinton bashing.
 
Where were you when Obama was using it throughout his presidency? The courts were backed up for years there were so many cases during his administration. People were losing their properties and assets because they couldn't get a court hearing within the 1 year deadline to challenge what was taken from them. You didn't speak up then and have zero rights to complain now.
And Donald Trump's attorney general

JUST EXPANDED IT

do you have anything to say about THAT Jeremiah?



Updated at 4:25 p.m. ET

Attorney General Jeff Sessions rolled back a series of Obama-era curbs on civil-asset forfeiture on Wednesday, strengthening the federal government’s power to seize cash and property from Americans without first bringing criminal charges against them.

In a statement announcing the Justice Department’s new policy directive, Sessions described civil forfeiture as a “key tool that helps law enforcement defund organized crime, take back ill-gotten gains, and prevent new crimes from being committed.” He also cast it as part of his larger push to imprint the president’s hardline stance on criminal-justice matters onto the federal government’s tactics against crime.


“President Trump has directed this Department of Justice to reduce crime in this country, and we will use every lawful tool that we have to do that,” he said at a gathering of law-enforcement officials on Wednesday. “We will continue to encourage civil-asset forfeiture whenever appropriate in order to hit organized crime in the wallet.”

The directive revives the Justice Department’s Equitable Sharing Program, a controversial process through which state and local police agencies can seize assets, then transfer those seizures to federal control. In doing so, local agencies can skirt some state-level regulations limiting forfeitures. Under the program, the federal government pools the funds derived from the assets and sends 80 percent of them back to the state or local department itself, sometimes evading state laws that say seized assets should go into a state’s general fund.

Civil forfeiture has existed in some form since the colonial era, although most of the current laws date to the War on Drugs’ heyday in the 1980s. Law-enforcement officials like Sessions defend modern civil forfeiture as a way to limit the resources of drug cartels and organized-crime groups. It’s also a lucrative tactic for law-enforcement agencies in an era of tight budgets

READ MORE! The Bipartisan Opposition to Sessions's New Civil-Forfeiture Rules
 
Where were you when Obama was using it throughout his presidency? The courts were backed up for years there were so many cases during his administration. People were losing their properties and assets because they couldn't get a court hearing within the 1 year deadline to challenge what was taken from them. You didn't speak up then and have zero rights to complain now.
And Donald Trump's attorney general

JUST EXPANDED IT

do you have anything to say about THAT Jeremiah?



Updated at 4:25 p.m. ET

Attorney General Jeff Sessions rolled back a series of Obama-era curbs on civil-asset forfeiture on Wednesday, strengthening the federal government’s power to seize cash and property from Americans without first bringing criminal charges against them.

In a statement announcing the Justice Department’s new policy directive, Sessions described civil forfeiture as a “key tool that helps law enforcement defund organized crime, take back ill-gotten gains, and prevent new crimes from being committed.” He also cast it as part of his larger push to imprint the president’s hardline stance on criminal-justice matters onto the federal government’s tactics against crime.


“President Trump has directed this Department of Justice to reduce crime in this country, and we will use every lawful tool that we have to do that,” he said at a gathering of law-enforcement officials on Wednesday. “We will continue to encourage civil-asset forfeiture whenever appropriate in order to hit organized crime in the wallet.”

The directive revives the Justice Department’s Equitable Sharing Program, a controversial process through which state and local police agencies can seize assets, then transfer those seizures to federal control. In doing so, local agencies can skirt some state-level regulations limiting forfeitures. Under the program, the federal government pools the funds derived from the assets and sends 80 percent of them back to the state or local department itself, sometimes evading state laws that say seized assets should go into a state’s general fund.

Civil forfeiture has existed in some form since the colonial era, although most of the current laws date to the War on Drugs’ heyday in the 1980s. Law-enforcement officials like Sessions defend modern civil forfeiture as a way to limit the resources of drug cartels and organized-crime groups. It’s also a lucrative tactic for law-enforcement agencies in an era of tight budgets

READ MORE! The Bipartisan Opposition to Sessions's New Civil-Forfeiture Rules
And they can't imagine why the masses have no respect for them..
 
Why are you worried about the Clintons, Podesta brothers, Obama and Soros losing everything they have? If ever there was a good purpose for this law - this is it!
^ :cuckoo:
You're the one flashing hail Satan hand signs in your avatar and you call me crazy? Look in the mirror. Better yet why not explain why your little Lucifer worshipping comrade lost the election? It isn't like she (and everyone in collusion with her including MSM) didn't break every law in the book to win and yet at the end of it all? She loses. One would think you people would figure out by name that it is God that is in full control and not the defeated foe you're all bowing down to. Time for you to switch sides, Blackflag. You're on the losing team.

Rejects don't realize how dumbed down they seriously are.

upload_2017-7-23_14-38-15.png
 
Why are you worried about the Clintons, Podesta brothers, Obama and Soros losing everything they have? If ever there was a good purpose for this law - this is it!
^ :cuckoo:
You're the one flashing hail Satan hand signs in your avatar and you call me crazy? Look in the mirror. Better yet why not explain why your little Lucifer worshipping comrade lost the election? It isn't like she (and everyone in collusion with her including MSM) didn't break every law in the book to win and yet at the end of it all? She loses. One would think you people would figure out by name that it is God that is in full control and not the defeated foe you're all bowing down to. Time for you to switch sides, Blackflag. You're on the losing team.

Rejects don't realize how dumbed down they seriously are.

View attachment 140197

upload_2017-7-23_14-38-54.png
 
Yeah, that re-entry of the feds into unconstitutional asset forfeiture without due process is so smooth of Trump's administration, just to let you know that the thieves are the ones running the govt....

You act like the civil asset forfeiture ever stopped. It didn't.


Sent from my iPhone using USMessageBoard.com
 

Forum List

Back
Top