Chris Wallace cant get an Answer from Fiorina

Jeeze. I've heard the same thing on many inteviews where the interviewee dodges the question. Thats both parties and all networks. Nothing new there at all.

Ever listend to Barry Boy???? He just goes off on one of his 5 minute disertations. Eats up the time and says absolutely nothing. Gold Star for OL'BO in question dodging. LOL
 
How about HUD, Education, and any other program that has no Constitutional basis for existing?

How about the military existing off American soil? That seems unconstitutional to me, for if you are not defending Americans in America, you must be running a mercenary military for corporate use.
So on a tactical standpoint, how should America protect its vital interests overseas without our military presence?

What part of the United States Constitution allows for over 700 military bases world wide?
 
Not one con has explained what they'd cut.

That's because they aren't going to cut anything. They will extend all of the Bush tax cuts and maintain spending on entitlement programs. Which means we'll go just that much farther into the crapper. At least the Dems are not afraid to shoot for a balance budget. The GOP won't even try for one because they are all about 'being in power' and not about governing.
 
Holy Shit! She answered!! Not her fault you Progressives are too fucking dumb to understand it!

How the fuck are you supposed to have a conversation with people too fucking stupid to understand things out in the trillion column?
 
Last edited:
How the fuck do Progressive muster the brain power or to feed themselves and breed? Seriously?

Do you even realize how fundamentally illiterate, ignorant and downright stupid you people are?
 
Chris Wallace is a progressive I assume, boy wait till he hears about this
 
They're all running on the same old formula:

Cut taxes, increase military spending, and then make some massive politically impossible cuts somewhere else that will balance the budget.

It's the GOP's modern day version of alchemy.

What's sad is, most sensible conservatives know (in their hearts and minds) that it's nonsense, but they pretend to believe it anyway.

What's sad is that democrats refuse to face the reality that 1.3 trillion dollar annual budget deficits are unsustainable and will lead this country to it's economic demise.
 
They're all running on the same old formula:

Cut taxes, increase military spending, and then make some massive politically impossible cuts somewhere else that will balance the budget.

It's the GOP's modern day version of alchemy.

What's sad is, most sensible conservatives know (in their hearts and minds) that it's nonsense, but they pretend to believe it anyway.

What's sad is that democrats refuse to face the reality that 1.3 trillion dollar annual budget deficits are unsustainable and will lead this country to it's economic demise.
Dick Cheney on Budget & EconomyCheney to Treasury: "Deficits don't matter"

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill was told "deficits don't matter" when he warned of a looming fiscal crisis.
O'Neill, fired in a shakeup of Bush's economic team in December 2002, raised objections to a new round of tax cuts and said the president balked at his more aggressive plan to combat corporate crime after a string of accounting scandals because of opposition from "the corporate crowd," a key constituency.
O'Neill said he tried to warn Vice President Dick Cheney that growing budget deficits-expected to top $500 billion this fiscal year alone-posed a threat to the economy. Cheney cut him off. "You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter," he said, according to excerpts. Cheney continued: "We won the midterms (congressional elections). This is our due." A month later, Cheney told the Treasury secretary he was fired.
The vice president's office had no immediate comment, but John Snow, who replaced O'Neill, insisted that deficits "do matter" to the administration.
 
Not one con has explained what they'd cut.

How about HUD, Education, and any other program that has no Constitutional basis for existing?

Why won't your clown car load of tea party candidates step up and say that then?

They do, and then they have to take it back because the people object. Some of them say social security should be cut, then they realize they won't get any votes if they say it.

They are full of shit.
 
How about HUD, Education, and any other program that has no Constitutional basis for existing?

How about the military existing off American soil? That seems unconstitutional to me, for if you are not defending Americans in America, you must be running a mercenary military for corporate use.
So on a tactical standpoint, how should America protect its vital interests overseas without our military presence?

Like any other nation?
 
How about HUD, Education, and any other program that has no Constitutional basis for existing?

How about the military existing off American soil? That seems unconstitutional to me, for if you are not defending Americans in America, you must be running a mercenary military for corporate use.
So on a tactical standpoint, how should America protect its vital interests overseas without our military presence?

Bring American companies back to America and we won't have to guard them overseas.....
 
They're all running on the same old formula:

Cut taxes, increase military spending, and then make some massive politically impossible cuts somewhere else that will balance the budget.

It's the GOP's modern day version of alchemy.

What's sad is, most sensible conservatives know (in their hearts and minds) that it's nonsense, but they pretend to believe it anyway.

What's sad is that democrats refuse to face the reality that 1.3 trillion dollar annual budget deficits are unsustainable and will lead this country to it's economic demise.
Dick Cheney on Budget & EconomyCheney to Treasury: "Deficits don't matter"

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill was told "deficits don't matter" when he warned of a looming fiscal crisis.
O'Neill, fired in a shakeup of Bush's economic team in December 2002, raised objections to a new round of tax cuts and said the president balked at his more aggressive plan to combat corporate crime after a string of accounting scandals because of opposition from "the corporate crowd," a key constituency.
O'Neill said he tried to warn Vice President Dick Cheney that growing budget deficits-expected to top $500 billion this fiscal year alone-posed a threat to the economy. Cheney cut him off. "You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter," he said, according to excerpts. Cheney continued: "We won the midterms (congressional elections). This is our due." A month later, Cheney told the Treasury secretary he was fired.
The vice president's office had no immediate comment, but John Snow, who replaced O'Neill, insisted that deficits "do matter" to the administration.

This guy disagrees with you, Dems and Cheney...


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLr6dR_LmIM&feature=related[/ame]
 
Last edited:
What's sad is that democrats refuse to face the reality that 1.3 trillion dollar annual budget deficits are unsustainable and will lead this country to it's economic demise.
Dick Cheney on Budget & EconomyCheney to Treasury: "Deficits don't matter"

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill was told "deficits don't matter" when he warned of a looming fiscal crisis.
O'Neill, fired in a shakeup of Bush's economic team in December 2002, raised objections to a new round of tax cuts and said the president balked at his more aggressive plan to combat corporate crime after a string of accounting scandals because of opposition from "the corporate crowd," a key constituency.
O'Neill said he tried to warn Vice President Dick Cheney that growing budget deficits-expected to top $500 billion this fiscal year alone-posed a threat to the economy. Cheney cut him off. "You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter," he said, according to excerpts. Cheney continued: "We won the midterms (congressional elections). This is our due." A month later, Cheney told the Treasury secretary he was fired.
The vice president's office had no immediate comment, but John Snow, who replaced O'Neill, insisted that deficits "do matter" to the administration.

This guy disagrees with you, Dems and Cheney...


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLr6dR_LmIM&feature=related[/ame]

Furthermore, Obama and the dems current deficit is nearly three times higher than Bush's highest deficit with a dem controlled Congress.
 

Attachments

  • $obama_budget_deficit.jpg
    $obama_budget_deficit.jpg
    20.8 KB · Views: 84
Not one con has explained what they'd cut.

How about HUD, Education, and any other program that has no Constitutional basis for existing?

Ya...good call dummy. Let's make our kids dummer and add to the conditions that promote desperation in the inner cities. How much does it cost the tax payers to house inmates? $50,000 a year per prisoner? It would be cheaper to give everyone in need a guaranteed free college education and a free house upon graduation than add 10-20 million to the ranks of the incarcerated. Abandoning the poor and uneducated would end up costing 2.5 to 5 trillion dollars a year just to house them behind bars.

That is the problem with letting fear mongering morons decide solutions to our problems. They take no responsibility for anything even though the problems will not go away. Your answer is always ...just let people fail and when they do..lock them up. No one is going to starve and blow away as dust you thoughtless fuck wit. They are going to do what even you would if forced by circumstance. You will do whatever it takes to survive..including robbing and selling drugs. Ya you...you pious moron would be on a street corner slinging crack if it meant the difference between you and your family starving to death. Then you would get caught and go to prison. That is reality sparky. It isn't bleeding heart...it is just the way it is when there are no jobs, education and no opportunity or hope.

This isn't the same country it was fifty- sixty years ago when we as Americans had the world on a leash and called all of the shots. Now the world, thanks to the International Corporatist, their sycophant lackeys and supporters like you and the WTO have sunk their vampire teeth into our throats and drained us of the manufacturing strength that offered our people a decent living and the best education opportunities on the planet.

In short you are full of shit and worthless to add to the conversation of repair to our countries problems.

An old man screaming "Get off my lawn" won't even save your own lawn.
 
Last edited:
He used to be a decent journalist before he joined Fox. Maybe he's finally waking up.
 
Dick Cheney on Budget & EconomyCheney to Treasury: "Deficits don't matter"

Former Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill was told "deficits don't matter" when he warned of a looming fiscal crisis.
O'Neill, fired in a shakeup of Bush's economic team in December 2002, raised objections to a new round of tax cuts and said the president balked at his more aggressive plan to combat corporate crime after a string of accounting scandals because of opposition from "the corporate crowd," a key constituency.
O'Neill said he tried to warn Vice President Dick Cheney that growing budget deficits-expected to top $500 billion this fiscal year alone-posed a threat to the economy. Cheney cut him off. "You know, Paul, Reagan proved deficits don't matter," he said, according to excerpts. Cheney continued: "We won the midterms (congressional elections). This is our due." A month later, Cheney told the Treasury secretary he was fired.
The vice president's office had no immediate comment, but John Snow, who replaced O'Neill, insisted that deficits "do matter" to the administration.

This guy disagrees with you, Dems and Cheney...


[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLr6dR_LmIM&feature=related[/ame]

Furthermore, Obama and the dems current deficit is nearly three times higher than Bush's highest deficit with a dem controlled Congress.
11776d1287432231-chris-wallace-cant-get-an-answer-from-fiorina-obama_budget_deficit.jpg
There's that same phony chart again, a testament to the ignorance, stupidity and gullibility of CON$.

CON$ are so stupid they think if you deficit spend "off budget" then "off budget" deficit spending is not deficit spending. :cuckoo:

Bush's highest deficit was 1.4 TRILLION DOLLARS in 2008, as you well know. Bush dishonestly kept 1 TRILLION DOLLARS "off budget," but deficit spending is deficit spending whether it is on budget or off.
 
Last edited:
He used to be a decent journalist before he joined Fox. Maybe he's finally waking up.
If you could bring yourself to actually watch shows like Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace or Special Report with Bret Baier nightly you would see that Wallace pushes for answers like he did with Fieorina all of the time, and Bret brings a panel every single night with opinions on the days events from both political camps. Instead you seem to get your impressions about Fox from its opponents, and it's competition. Too sad really, that you believe that you are getting the whole story from only one side. Fox is the ony news outlet that gives both sides an equal voice, and tries to penetrate through the smokescreen both sides project.

I do happen to watch shows like Meet the Press (on Sundays after FNS) and CNN the rest of the day. I'm amazed at the amount of time they spend on CNN talking about Fox News.
 
Holy Shit! She answered!! Not her fault you Progressives are too fucking dumb to understand it!

How the fuck are you supposed to have a conversation with people too fucking stupid to understand things out in the trillion column?

What was her answer?
 
U-Turn in the U.K.: Big Spending Cuts - WSJ.com

LONGBENTON, England—This northeast England town has long boasted it has the largest office complex in Europe. But the 8,000 employees who fill two gray buildings here known informally as "the Ministry" all work for the government. And their boss, U.K. Prime Minister David Cameron, is about to send many of them home for good.

Most work for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs, the tax agency. Their jobs are the legacy of decades of spending—especially by the prior Labour Party government—that pumped public money into Longbenton and similar places as factories closed.

As Britain grapples with a massive budget deficit, Mr. Cameron is now intent on weaning Britain off public money in hopes of reviving private enterprise.
 

Forum List

Back
Top