Skull Pilot
Diamond Member
- Nov 17, 2007
- 45,446
- 6,163
- 1,830
I don't see a problem.
Our income has more than tripled in the last 5 years.
In that case, fuck you.
And that increase has not negatively affected you
so go fuck yourself.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I don't see a problem.
Our income has more than tripled in the last 5 years.
In that case, fuck you.
Just make up your opponents argument, attack, and get high fives from your brethren. All in a days work for a USMB Right Wing Nut.
The "crux" of my argument is not that if taxes are raised on the rich, I will get more income. That's not even what I would argue.
My point is that over the last 30 years the wages of the majority of Americans have not been keeping up with the cost of living while a small few flourishing more so than ever. That's an undeniable fact that y'all wish to ignore and I think that's fucked up a) that it's happening and b) that a lot of people not only don't see anything wrong with it but try to shout it down when it's brought up. I'm not alone but it's all "irrelevant" you guys. Wages are stagnant for most and things have been getting harder and harder for all but a few. Ho hum. You see what's been going on around you and you don't bat an eye at it.
The sad thing is that the grip is so strong and so accepted that there's really not much that can be done about it. The country as a whole has to bend over and take it.
Y'all are an embarrassment.
Boot lickers.
And the remedy is to raise taxes on those making the most according to people here.
All I asked was how will raising taxes address income disparity and you said that question was "retarded".
And BTW if you don't think taxes will address said income disparity that what exactly will?
Perhaps telling people they can only make a predetermined maximum income?
Setting a maximum limit on earnings will never happen and I don't think it should be done. Legislation that ties CEO and top exec pay to their lowest paid employee wont happen either, however I do think that work wonders in aligning the slopes of those line. As I said....the grip is so strong, the elite and big money interest have so much control that anything that could do something about that massive skew is DOA.
The question no one is asking is how can a person who was of moderate means before being elected and earns only 160K a year while serving becomes a multi millionaire in just a few short years?
People here want to blame it on "the rich" or "big business" bribing politicians but I blame the politicians who pass laws to enrich themselves.
The question no one is asking is how can a person who was of moderate means before being elected and earns only 160K a year while serving becomes a multi millionaire in just a few short years?
People here want to blame it on "the rich" or "big business" bribing politicians but I blame the politicians who pass laws to enrich themselves.
This is confusing. I thought you were all for the richest continuing to become richer and richer.
You really can't expect that the very same Congress people that cook the laws for the richest wouldn't include for themselves a little of that gravy. Would you?
And you have to have most of the members in Congress being millioniares. Otherwise it would look like poor people selling favors to rich people.
Now it is rich people giving favors for richer people.
See the difference? "Selling" vs. "Giving"
I don't see a problem.
Our income has more than tripled in the last 5 years.
In that case, fuck you.
And that increase has not negatively affected you
so go fuck yourself.
Just how stupid do they think Americans are?
George Bush was never elected by the American people.
Both elections were heavily flawed by right wing tactics
Do you sheep really think that the government taking money away from those who make more than you will increase your income?
Do you sheep really think that the government taking money away from those who make more than you will increase your income?
Yeah, It's not like when we had REALLY high top tax rates, over 90% during that PINKO COMMIE Eisenhower's administration, that the middle class did well.
Oh wait...that was the MOST PROSPEROUS TIME for the middle class, wasn't it?
Gee, well it certainly appears that HIGH TOP TAX rates do NOT, in and of themselves PREVENT middle class upward mobility, do they?
And what happened as top tax rates went DOWN?
Why golly, middle class wages stagnated for the last 30 years as taxes on the rich were cut and our deficits grew.
Hmmm...seems that rather than invest and GROW a company, execs decided to take the money and run.
That you choose to ignore empirical historical evidence on high top tax rates only shows what a pawn you are.
The fact you think some americans should be treated differently shows you are a low life.
The poor will either become poor enough to go to work, or not be nearly poor enough.
George Bush was never elected by the American people.
Both elections were heavily flawed by right wing tactics
Could be. But the American people were to stupid (some anyway) to understand what had happened.
And the others that did understand what they had done, were very proud.