Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Civil War has been over for quite some time and your side lost.
Unlike the 3 Georgia hillbillies who are spending the rest of their lives in jail for murdering a man who was jogging while Black, Zimmerman had the sense to not take a film crew on his negro hunt.
My point was that guns change the way people think and they influence the decisions that people make. If this guy didn't have a gun, he probably wouldn't have opened the door and attacked this kid who went to the wrong house.
If George Zimmerman hadn't had a concealed gun, he probably wouldn't have stalked Trayvon Martin around the neighborhood before getting into a physical altercation with him and killing him. For the record, I agreed that the law was on GZ's side, but it shouldn't have been. He instigated that entire conflict.
If Michael Dunn hadn't been armed, he wouldn't have gotten into an altercation with 4 black teenagers and shot Jordan Davis to death.
People who think they can just legally shoot someone think and act differently than people who are unarmed and face the possibility of getting knuckles to the face. Or people who think they can legally shoot someone think and act differently than those who think they might get into legal trouble if they shoot without sufficient justification. States like Florida and Missouri have made it easier for the average paranoid, angry white male to shoot someone. Consequently, they're more likely to behave like vigilantes.
So yeah, as I said, it's the fucking guns.
My point was that guns change the way people think and they influence the decisions that people make. If this guy didn't have a gun, he probably wouldn't have opened the door and attacked this kid who went to the wrong house.
If George Zimmerman hadn't had a concealed gun, he probably wouldn't have stalked Trayvon Martin around the neighborhood before getting into a physical altercation with him and killing him. For the record, I agreed that the law was on GZ's side, but it shouldn't have been. He instigated that entire conflict.
If Michael Dunn hadn't been armed, he wouldn't have gotten into an altercation with 4 black teenagers and shot Jordan Davis to death.
People who think they can just legally shoot someone think and act differently than people who are unarmed and face the possibility of getting knuckles to the face. Or people who think they can legally shoot someone think and act differently than those who think they might get into legal trouble if they shoot without sufficient justification. States like Florida and Missouri have made it easier for the average paranoid, angry white male to shoot someone. Consequently, they're more likely to behave like vigilantes.
So yeah, as I said, it's the fucking guns.
That's a good story, but today's republicans have the mindset of those democrats.He’s not a democrat….the democrats started the Civil War to keep blacks as their slaves and they were defeated by the republicans who freed the blacks…..get your history straight.
And the fact that blacks have used stand your ground laws as their defense, and won, more than whites shows you don’t understand any of these issues…….
That's a good story, but today's republicans have the mindset of those democrats.
You didn’t follow the Zimmerman case…obviously…….Zimmerman didn’t get into a physical altercation with Martin………martin lost Zimmerman in the townhouse complex….then circled around and violently assaulted Zimmerman…..who was already on his way back to the parking lot to meet the police……
martin was free and clear when he decided to attack Zimmerman….
that you speak out of your ass on this topic puts everything you post in question….
I did follow the case, fucktard. I didn't say that Zimmerman initiated the actual fight itself, and to clarify, whether I liked it or not, Zimmerman basically acted within the law.
But Zimmerman's actions were totally unnecessary, went against the advice of a dispatcher, and it caused a young Martin who was unfamiliar with the area and its residents to become confused and panic. Zimmerman started the whole thing with his tough guy act, pursuing someone around the neighborhood. The only reason he did was because he was armed. Too much of a doughboy pussy to confront Martin unarmed.
Go shove a beehive in your ass. I bet you'd quite like it.
Unlike the 3 Georgia hillbillies who are spending the rest of their lives in jail for murdering a man who was jogging while Black, Zimmerman had the sense to not take a film crew on his negro hunt.
If he has dementia, he has a solid defense that will result in him being institutionalized until he dies. I’m normally against the “not guilty by reason of insanity defense”. Ive always thought that insane killers should be institutionalixed until they are cured, then transferred to prison to serve out the sentence for their crimes, not released into the population at large.
No...they weren't....he didn't engage martin in anyway, made no contact with martin..........he began following martin to let the police know where he was......
Look, I have no idea where you're from. Maybe in your world, being followed by some stranger in a car and then on foot at night isn't perceived as a threat, but to me and most people I've ever met, it is. Zimmerman started the whole fucking thing by being a pretend cop.
Not reading the rest of your pro-NRA defense of fat boy because it's lame spin. Go find a broomstick and sit on it. I'm sure you'll enjoy it.
Finally! An eye witness.And since martin was completely clear of zimmerman....out if visual contact with him and zimmerman was walkimg in the opposite direction when martin circled around and ambushed him, how do you say there was a physical threat?
Martin had to run to get ahead of zimmerman....
you are wrong and now you have to cover for your ignorance on this topic
Yea that's why black folks thrive in the Republican Party.No....they don't. In fact....republicans don't even think about race......the democrat party is obsessed with race....using it as a tool, a weapon and a shield........while the republicans couldn't care less about it........the democrats know this, so they use race as a weapon, then, when their polices destroy minorities in every way, they use race to shield themselves from the fall out .....
My point was that guns change the way people think and they influence the decisions that people make. If this guy didn't have a gun, he probably wouldn't have opened the door and attacked this kid who went to the wrong house.
If George Zimmerman hadn't had a concealed gun, he probably wouldn't have stalked Trayvon Martin around the neighborhood before getting into a physical altercation with him and killing him. For the record, I agreed that the law was on GZ's side, but it shouldn't have been. He instigated that entire conflict.
If Michael Dunn hadn't been armed, he wouldn't have gotten into an altercation with 4 black teenagers and shot Jordan Davis to death.
People who think they can just legally shoot someone think and act differently than people who are unarmed and face the possibility of getting knuckles to the face. Or people who think they can legally shoot someone think and act differently than those who think they might get into legal trouble if they shoot without sufficient justification. States like Florida and Missouri have made it easier for the average paranoid, angry white male to shoot someone. Consequently, they're more likely to behave like vigilantes.
So yeah, as I said, it's the fucking guns.
Finally! An eye witness.
Yea that's why black folks thrive in the Republican Party.
the democrat cities where they are trapped, are creating generational poverty and crime for them.
Then why don’t Republican candidates go in to the inner cities and explain how much better their lives would be under Republican leadership?
Because it won’t be
