Silhouette
Gold Member
- Jul 15, 2013
- 25,815
- 1,938
- 265
Ah, when defying federal law bites back in this twofold poetic irony...
Meanwhile in Petaluma and outlying areas there are bands of thieves hitting pot grows. 20 guesses which nationality they are and if they are enjoying protected status for the crimes. It is a bizarre world in the land of the golden sun. 5 Arrested, 4 Sought In Series Of Petaluma Home Invasion Robberies
Notice in the video the reporter says there are eyewitnesses to the pistol-whipping, invasion and home robbery by "the people" who committed the crimes. They kept saying "the people"..."the people"...giving no physical description whatsoever, yet asking for help. How the fuck do people help when no physical description whatsoever is given of suspects who were seen and clearly described to the police?
It's a rhetorical question. Because if they were white, they would be described down to the color of their undershorts.
The problem with this is that in the California Constitution, law enforcement officers are supposed to exercise "good faith" in protecting potential or actual victims of crime. Seeing as how they had a description of the suspects and WITHHELD that description from other citizens in what the police were calling an ongoing crime spree, means the police are actively suppressing protection of the citizens by refusing to give physical descriptions of the suspects. There was even a "shelter in place" warning to all the residents in surrounding areas of the crime wave.
"Shelter in place and be on the lookout...for...you know...people...driving some cars..." Watch the video, it's amazing.
Article I, Section 28 of the CA Constitution: Codes Display Text
By withholding suspect descriptions from the public, the involved police/media acting on police direction put the citizenry at undue risk and are guilty of negligence to protect.
Meanwhile in Petaluma and outlying areas there are bands of thieves hitting pot grows. 20 guesses which nationality they are and if they are enjoying protected status for the crimes. It is a bizarre world in the land of the golden sun. 5 Arrested, 4 Sought In Series Of Petaluma Home Invasion Robberies
Notice in the video the reporter says there are eyewitnesses to the pistol-whipping, invasion and home robbery by "the people" who committed the crimes. They kept saying "the people"..."the people"...giving no physical description whatsoever, yet asking for help. How the fuck do people help when no physical description whatsoever is given of suspects who were seen and clearly described to the police?
It's a rhetorical question. Because if they were white, they would be described down to the color of their undershorts.
The problem with this is that in the California Constitution, law enforcement officers are supposed to exercise "good faith" in protecting potential or actual victims of crime. Seeing as how they had a description of the suspects and WITHHELD that description from other citizens in what the police were calling an ongoing crime spree, means the police are actively suppressing protection of the citizens by refusing to give physical descriptions of the suspects. There was even a "shelter in place" warning to all the residents in surrounding areas of the crime wave.
"Shelter in place and be on the lookout...for...you know...people...driving some cars..." Watch the video, it's amazing.
Article I, Section 28 of the CA Constitution: Codes Display Text
(e) As used in this section, a “victim” is a person who suffers direct or threatened physical, psychological, or financial harm as a result of the commission or attempted commission of a crime or delinquent act. The term “victim” also includes the person’s spouse, parents, children, siblings, or guardian, and includes a lawful representative of a crime victim who is deceased, a minor, or physically or psychologically incapacitated. The term “victim” does not include a person in custody for an offense, the accused, or a person whom the court finds would not act in the best interests of a minor victim.
By withholding suspect descriptions from the public, the involved police/media acting on police direction put the citizenry at undue risk and are guilty of negligence to protect.
Last edited: