Can't we at least arm teachers with cans of BEAR SPRAY??

Yes - bear spray is not perfect. The range is only 30 feet or so but guns have disadvantages too. Anyone can easily shoot a can of bear spray since they are silent and have no recoil and there is no need for great accuracy anyway. They are cheap - $40. And no threat of killing an innocent person.

Will some shooters then wear gas masks? Perhaps, but bear spray in the eyes is horrible and so the mask will have to cover their eyes too and the spray on the lenses will make it hard to see.

Mind you i'm talking about those big 8 inch cannisters of bear spray, not those dinky cans of mace that only go 5 feet.


Not a bad idea, still, the best idea is to limit access into schools with monitors watching the entrances with metal detector wands and a simple search. Can't be too hard to tell a person is carrying a rifle, firearms and ammo! Until you get past the monitor, there is no entering the school.
 
Not a bad idea, still, the best idea is to limit access into schools with monitors watching the entrances with metal detector wands and a simple search. Can't be too hard to tell a person is carrying a rifle, firearms and ammo! Until you get past the monitor, there is no entering the school.


Know what a window is?
 
Most Blacks in the cities carry at least a knife and often a firearm. Just have schools like corporate facilities. ID's or you don't get in. Now ID's are an issue for democrats because that means you must identify yourself and the government might discover you are an illegal alien, like Obama was. But do you want safety, or political correctness?
 
Yes - bear spray is not perfect. The range is only 30 feet or so but guns have disadvantages too. Anyone can easily shoot a can of bear spray since they are silent and have no recoil and there is no need for great accuracy anyway. They are cheap - $40. And no threat of killing an innocent person.

Will some shooters then wear gas masks? Perhaps, but bear spray in the eyes is horrible and so the mask will have to cover their eyes too and the spray on the lenses will make it hard to see.

Mind you i'm talking about those big 8 inch cannisters of bear spray, not those dinky cans of mace that only go 5 feet.
who is stopping you from arming teachers with guns in your or any state? ANSWER- NOT the federal government.
 
dont bring a knife to a gun fight

Bear spray works pretty good in a gun fight. Esp inside 30 feet.

I don't think you can spray that stuff inside without affecting everyone else in the room.

besides that it is limited in range

perhaps a nice secondary weapon

when kids are getting blasted you dont have time to fool around with such things as "bear spray"

Don't bring bear spray to a gun fight!
 
Class rooms should have bullet proof blankets that can protect students or be used to contain or attack shooter, Guns with replaceable magazines should be banned.
 
Class rooms should have bullet proof blankets that can protect students or be used to contain or attack shooter, Guns with replaceable magazines should be banned.

You have absolutely ZERO clue what the purpose of the 2nd amendment is.

That or you're just another brainwashed Lefty who cherishes absolute government authority over human life and liberty....and if that's the case....have you tried Cuba or Venezuela....or maybe even China?
You might be more comfortable there.

iu
 
Why is it okay to have armed guards at ANY other venue except at a school? I think it is an excellent idea for a teacher to keep a gun locked in a safe under the desk. Then, if a gunman bursts into the room and starts shooting, the teacher will be under the desk, able to access that weapon and use it. That is the only way to stop a madman. All of the whining and laws are not going to stop these crazy people. That should be just common sense! Criminals and murderers ignore laws!
 
Class rooms should have bullet proof blankets that can protect students or be used to contain or attack shooter, Guns with replaceable magazines should be banned.

You have absolutely ZERO clue what the purpose of the 2nd amendment is.

That or you're just another brainwashed Lefty who cherishes absolute government authority over human life and liberty....and if that's the case....have you tried Cuba or Venezuela....or maybe even China?
You might be more comfortable there.

iu
You Retard, replaceable magazines are not useful in protecting life or liberty. They are only for wasting ammo, enriching ammo companies & rapid mass execution. I bet you got off watching the Vegas crowds screaming, crying, dying, squirming, crawling, fighting & running for their lives.
 
Last edited:
Yes - bear spray is not perfect. The range is only 30 feet or so but guns have disadvantages too. Anyone can easily shoot a can of bear spray since they are silent and have no recoil and there is no need for great accuracy anyway. They are cheap - $40. And no threat of killing an innocent person.

Will some shooters then wear gas masks? Perhaps, but bear spray in the eyes is horrible and so the mask will have to cover their eyes too and the spray on the lenses will make it hard to see.

Mind you i'm talking about those big 8 inch cannisters of bear spray, not those dinky cans of mace that only go 5 feet.
Well, that is better than arming them with guns. However, that does not address the root of the problem. Which is, easy access to weapons of war by the mental cases. To do that, we should require anyone that wants to buy such a weapon to have a class 3 license. That should include any semiautomatic pistol that has a clip, unless that gun is equipped in such a manner that it requires at least two minutes to replace the clip. Since there are already millions of such weapons out there, simply make it illegal for anyone to possess such a weapon off their property without that license. With a mandatory penalty of five years in the federal pen, possibility of parole in 6 months. And confiscation and destruction of all their guns, with the provision that they will never be able to own or have in their possession a firearm for the rest of their lives. And the sale of such weapons be allowed by and to only those with said license, private or otherwise. Same penalty should they break this law. That would greatly reduce the number of assault weapons sold, and make the ownership a penalty for those that should not have them in the first place.
 
What is wrong with our society, where we find it acceptable that school shooting are almost a weekly occurrence? What is wrong with us that we talk of armed guards at churches, schools, mall, and anywhere in society in general? No other nation has this problem. This was not a problem when I was going to school.

Every time there is a mass shooting, no matter whether and outdoor music concert, school, church, or work place, the NRA and GOP states the answer is more guns, and more people carrying guns. And so guns sales increase with each mass shooting, and then the frequency of mass shooting increase. Perhaps we need to rethink that mantra.
 
What is wrong with our society, where we find it acceptable that school shooting are almost a weekly occurrence? What is wrong with us that we talk of armed guards at churches, schools, mall, and anywhere in society in general? No other nation has this problem. This was not a problem when I was going to school.

Every time there is a mass shooting, no matter whether and outdoor music concert, school, church, or work place, the NRA and GOP states the answer is more guns, and more people carrying guns. And so guns sales increase with each mass shooting, and then the frequency of mass shooting increase. Perhaps we need to rethink that mantra.

Disagreement about the best way to mitigate or prevent school shootings does not indicate that others find them acceptable. This sort of argument is not helpful in any way, it merely inflames those who disagree.
 

Forum List

Back
Top