I think Booker is a good guy. Harris …. well she's ambitious but so was Obama. Booker needed a guy like Steyer to really buy in.yeah, she ran as Bernielite. She should have run just to the left of Biden, as Gary Hart did. But others tried. In the end, they're a bunch a losers. LOLIf she had wanted the centrist vote, she needed to change her belief structure or at least try to convince people she had. She is not as far out there as bernie, but not that far from it.Yep, being the VP on the dem loser ticket really does make her the front runner for 24. Cynicism knows no bounds. but apparently she did the math, and she's just not going to get centrist votes to derail Bernie.She is pandering for the VP slot
I think the dems basic problems were the centrists thought the unifying message should be "I can beat Trump." But the message really needed to be "I can get the Obamacare taxes reinacted and I can show you how to pay for kids' college educations." Biden didn't run on that. Warren was too busy talking about Wall St. Mayor Pete's never really done anything. Kamala Harris and Booker might have done that, but they didn't. To be fair, Obama didn't come up with his stump speech that convinced voters and donors he would win white votes until Iowa. But I'm not sure Harris or Booker ever identified to themselves why they were running. Klobachar is running because the guy who really should be running, Franken, can't.
I wish that Harris and Booker were still in the race. Sadly, they were victims of the fact that two of the least diverse states in the country got the first two contests. That needs to end, and there should be NO MORE CAUCUSES.