Real American
Rookie
- Jan 7, 2011
- 58
- 4
- 0
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #21
I'm saying that the spokeshole is unnamed.I'm saying that you're taking the word of an unnamed representative(?) from an insurance company.
And here I thought that socialists/progressives didn't trust a word that ushered from profiteering administrative suits from insurance companies.
like i said your reading comprehension is solely lacking. the company is freely admitting the rate hikes and reason for increasing them. why are you arguing this?
if youre agreeing that they company can increase rates 59% thus pushing more people out of the market, just say so..
I'm saying that cats like you generally believe that insurance companies are the scummiest double-dealing dirtbags on the planet.
Yet, you'll take the word of an unnamed spokeshole , from one of the scummiest double-dealing dirtbag industries on the planet, when it comports with your biases.
Never saw that one coming.
when did i ever say "i believe that insurance companies are the scummiest double-dealing dirtbags on the planet"?
i look at what he said, what was filed with the commissioners office and make a judgement. also i look at the new source (CNN) and determine how reputable the news agency is. in this case, there is nothing that points to anything that is not creditable. and the company is freely admitting this, its not a whistle blower case or a protected source, it was the company spokesman.
i do think its a shame that insurance companies take home huge profits for not providing services to its members.