California man tracked $24,000 in stolen camera gear to known hotspot. Police still haven’t shuttered it

Drop Dead Fred

Platinum Member
Jun 6, 2020
948
2,040
908
The video is from ABC News. The news article is from Fox.

Both are about the same victim of a car break in, who used tracking devices to find his stolen goods at a fencing operation, which is less two blocks from a police station in the city's Tenderloin district.

The police know about it. The city's elected Supervisors (including Dean Preston who represents the Tenderloin district) know about it. The District Attorney knows about it.

And all of them are deliberately and knowingly allowing this fencing ring to continue operating.

Preston ran for election as a self described socialist.

Since this was self inflicted by the voters, and I don't live there, I think it's hilarious.



California man tracked $24,000 in stolen camera gear to known hotspot. Police still haven't shuttered it

California man tracked $24,000 in stolen camera gear to known hotspot. Police still haven’t shuttered it

San Francisco police knew about this stolen goods hotspot before one man lost thousands in camera gear

By Jon Michael

September 29, 2023

San Francisco police didn’t raid or shutter a known hotspot where people sell stolen goods, located just blocks away from a local precinct, even after a film student tracked his $24,000 worth of stolen camera gear there.

“San Francisco is a five-alarm fire when it comes to property crimes like organized retail theft, auto burglary and car thefts,” Schuck told Fox News in an email. “The organized criminal enterprises operate freely.”

The film student was eating lunch in Oakland, California, when his cameras, lenses and drone were stolen from his rental car. Using Apple AirTags he’d put in the camera cases, Schuck traced the stolen goods to neighboring San Francisco before he called the police.

Dean Preston, the San Francisco supervisor in charge of the Tenderloin neighborhood, held a hearing on car break-ins last week where he said “the city has made no noticeable progress.” Still, Elon Musk called Preston — a democratic socialist — “the person most responsible for the destruction of San Francisco” and posted on X, formerly known as Twitter, that he “needs to be fired.”

Schuck also wants new city leaders.

“If the police know, and the Mayor knows, and the Supervisors know, and still this is allowed to operate.. This doesn’t pass the smell test,” he told Fox News in his email. “If everyone in political leadership, including Dean Preston, the Board Supervisor who represents the Tenderloin, were serious about solving the crime problem, they would have done it by now.”
 
It's time we take back OUR money. We are forced to pay for police, DA, courts, prisons and Dems refuse to provide the services we are forced to pay for. We should sue to get our tax dollars back since they refuse to do their jobs and refuse to deliver the services we are paying for.
 
It's time we take back OUR money. We are forced to pay for police, DA, courts, prisons and Dems refuse to provide the services we are forced to pay for. We should sue to get our tax dollars back since they refuse to do their jobs and refuse to deliver the services we are paying for.

I wonder if you might be on to something, there.

You're right, that we're compelled to pay taxes to government. In exchange for these taxes, government is supposed to be serving certain functions, one of the more important of which is law enforcement.

I wonder of there's a case for a lawsuit against various governments, on behalf of the taxpayers, that these governments are taking our money, but refusing to provide the services that we are supposedly paying for. If a private company was doing this, it would be actionable as fraud and nonfeasance.
 
I wonder if you might be on to something, there.

You're right, that we're compelled to pay taxes to government. In exchange for these taxes, government is supposed to be serving certain functions, one of the more important of which is law enforcement.

I wonder of there's a case for a lawsuit against various governments, on behalf of the taxpayers, that these governments are taking our money, but refusing to provide the services that we are supposedly paying for. If a private company was doing this, it would be actionable as fraud and nonfeasance.
87,000 armed IRS agents say you'll pay anyway.
 

Forum List

Back
Top