California Democrats Propose Strictest Gun Regulations In The Nation

[Lakhota]

Other states to follow.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Other states to follow.

Not that many

 

[The Rabbi]

Other states to follow.

Not that many

Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland. IOW the shitholes of this country that anyone would be wise to leave anyway.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Other states to follow.

Not that many

Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland. IOW the shitholes of this country that anyone would be wise to leave anyway.

I wouldn't live in those states for no amount of money.

 

[Spoonman]

Not that many

Illinois, New Jersey, Maryland. IOW the shitholes of this country that anyone would be wise to leave anyway.

I wouldn't live in those states for no amount of money.

i live in one but i won't be retiring in one

 

[Quantum Windbag]

States' rights in U.S. politics refers to political powers reserved for the U.S. state governments rather than the federal government according to the Tenth Amendment.

States' rights - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The 14th Amendment says that no state can make a law witch infringes on the rights of any citizen. That takes care of your specious 1th Amendment defense of California's blatant attempt to disarm poor blacks.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

By Zack Beauchamp

Thursday afternoon, a group of California Senate Democrats rolled out a legislative package that would create what would likely be the tightest gun regulation system in the nation, ranging from sweeping prohibitions on semi-automatic rifles to restrictions on guns in the home. The proposal consists of ten points:

1. Ban all semi-automatic rifles that accept detachable magazines.

2. Ban possession of high-capacity magazines.

3. Ban “bullet button” conversion kits.

4. Bans shotgun-rifle combinations.

5. Universal registration of all guns.

6. Background checks on ammunition.

7. Regulating gun loans.

8. Prevent prohibited individuals from living in homes with guns.

9. Cracking down on people who can’t own guns legally but do anyway.

10. Required safety training for handgun owners.

DETAILS: California Democrats Propose Strictest Gun Regulations In The Nation | ThinkProgress

I am not one of these NRA gun toting wackos and I would support placing some controls on some firearms (except for the fact I have no real idea of what type of restriction would actually be effective), but the part about not loaning or selling a gun to a person you know seems somewhat crazy. I mean I can't loan a gun to my best friend or brother, but I can hand the gun over to somebody I don't know? Am I missing something here or has my California legislature lost common sense?

You live in California, and you don't know if the legislature has lost its common sense?

 

[Quantum Windbag]

Our ex-cop is running around killing and we are going to take your guns.

This sums it up better than I could.

 

[Lakhota]

California is NOT trying to DISARM its people. It's gun control - not complete disarmament....

 

[bigrebnc1775]

California is NOT trying to DISARM its people. It's gun control - not complete disarmament....

1. Ban all semi-automatic rifles that accept detachable magazines.

2. Ban possession of high-capacity magazines.

3. Ban “bullet button” conversion kits.

4. Bans shotgun-rifle combinations.

5. Universal registration of all guns.

6. Background checks on ammunition.

7. Regulating gun loans.

8. Prevent prohibited individuals from living in homes with guns.

9. Cracking down on people who can’t own guns legally but do anyway.

 

[Lakhota]

California is NOT trying to DISARM its people. It's gun control - not complete disarmament....

1. Ban all semi-automatic rifles that accept detachable magazines.

2. Ban possession of high-capacity magazines.

3. Ban “bullet button” conversion kits.

4. Bans shotgun-rifle combinations.

5. Universal registration of all guns.

6. Background checks on ammunition.

7. Regulating gun loans.

8. Prevent prohibited individuals from living in homes with guns.

9. Cracking down on people who can’t own guns legally but do anyway.

Seems logical to me - especially for California...

 

[Quantum Windbag]

California is NOT trying to DISARM its people. It's gun control - not complete disarmament....

1. Ban all semi-automatic rifles that accept detachable magazines.

2. Ban possession of high-capacity magazines.

3. Ban “bullet button” conversion kits.

4. Bans shotgun-rifle combinations.

5. Universal registration of all guns.

6. Background checks on ammunition.

7. Regulating gun loans.

8. Prevent prohibited individuals from living in homes with guns.

9. Cracking down on people who can’t own guns legally but do anyway.

Seems logical to me - especially for California...

It seems logical to ban shotgun rifle combinations because they are new? Do you have any idea how long they have been around? They are banning them because they are considered starter guns for children, not because they are dangerous.

 

[OKTexas]

California is NOT trying to DISARM its people. It's gun control - not complete disarmament....

1. Ban all semi-automatic rifles that accept detachable magazines.

2. Ban possession of high-capacity magazines.

3. Ban “bullet button” conversion kits.

4. Bans shotgun-rifle combinations.

5. Universal registration of all guns.

6. Background checks on ammunition.

7. Regulating gun loans.

8. Prevent prohibited individuals from living in homes with guns.

9. Cracking down on people who can’t own guns legally but do anyway.

Seems logical to me - especially for California...

All these broad strokes, and no specifics as to how to accomplish them. And no explination how they would effect the real problem, criminals. Not going to waste any more time on this one.

 

[Lakhota]

1. Ban all semi-automatic rifles that accept detachable magazines.

2. Ban possession of high-capacity magazines.

3. Ban “bullet button” conversion kits.

4. Bans shotgun-rifle combinations.

5. Universal registration of all guns.

6. Background checks on ammunition.

7. Regulating gun loans.

8. Prevent prohibited individuals from living in homes with guns.

9. Cracking down on people who can’t own guns legally but do anyway.

Seems logical to me - especially for California...

It seems logical to ban shotgun rifle combinations because they are new? Do you have any idea how long they have been around? They are banning them because they are considered starter guns for children, not because they are dangerous.

Starter guns for children? That's funny. They "may" be in something like .410/.22 combinations - but you're leaving out all the available over/under rifle/shotgun combinations for big boys.

Crossfire MK-1 .223 Rifle/12g Shotgun combo

 

[martybegan]

Seems logical to me - especially for California...

It seems logical to ban shotgun rifle combinations because they are new? Do you have any idea how long they have been around? They are banning them because they are considered starter guns for children, not because they are dangerous.

Starter guns for children? That's funny. They "may" be in something like .410/.22 combinations - but you're leaving out all the available over/under rifle/shotgun combinations for big boys.

Crossfire MK-1 .223 Rifle/12g Shotgun combo

But the ban covers all of them.

Rural Californians are probably just as pissed off as rural NY'ers right now, and rightly so.

 

[AmericanFirst]

By Zack Beauchamp

Thursday afternoon, a group of California Senate Democrats rolled out a legislative package that would create what would likely be the tightest gun regulation system in the nation, ranging from sweeping prohibitions on semi-automatic rifles to restrictions on guns in the home. The proposal consists of ten points:

1. Ban all semi-automatic rifles that accept detachable magazines.

2. Ban possession of high-capacity magazines.

3. Ban “bullet button” conversion kits.

4. Bans shotgun-rifle combinations.

5. Universal registration of all guns.

6. Background checks on ammunition.

7. Regulating gun loans.

8. Prevent prohibited individuals from living in homes with guns.

9. Cracking down on people who can’t own guns legally but do anyway.

10. Required safety training for handgun owners.

DETAILS: California Democrats Propose Strictest Gun Regulations In The Nation | ThinkProgress

One big reason I will never live in that commie state.

 

[Wry Catcher]

This Nation has come unglued under the mis-direction of a President without compass... moral or otherwise.

LOL, when you have nothig to write (say) it's always Obama's fault. He's got a compass pal, you simply are too blind to see the direction the nation is heading. As California goes, so goes the nation.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Dems save lives !!!!! Lol

 

[blackhawk]

Yeah I'm sure that would have no impact what so ever on the criminals and wack jobs who care nothing about laws restrictions or regulations.

 

[Vandalshandle]

If California can make this happen, and enforce it, hell, I might get off of BART in Oakland some day!