Calif. Recognizes Gay Parents' Rights - As Far As Child Support

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by GotZoom, Aug 22, 2005.

  1. GotZoom
    Offline

    GotZoom Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,719
    Thanks Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Cordova, TN
    Ratings:
    +366
    SAN FRANCISCO — Same-sex couples who raise children are lawful parents and must provide for them if they break up, the California Supreme Court ruled Monday.

    The precedent-setting decision puts former gay and lesbian couples on equal ground with unmarried heterosexual couples who break up and marks the latest decision by the court recognizing rights of same-sex couples (search).

    The justices, ruling in three cases, announced for the first time that custody and child support laws that hold absent fathers accountable and protect children from the stigma of illegitimacy also apply to estranged gay and lesbian couples who used reproductive science to conceive.

    In doing so, a Marin County woman was granted the right to be the second mother of twins after the birth mother moved out of state. The court also ruled that a lesbian woman cannot avoid paying child support for her former partner's biological children, and that another woman could not go to court to terminate the parental rights of her former lover, years after obtaining a court order stipulating they were both parents.

    "The court is now protecting the children of same sex parents in gay families in the same way children are protected with heterosexual couples in heterosexual families," said Jill Hersh, who argued the unnamed Marin County woman's case before the justices.

    Courtney Joslin, an attorney with the National Center For Lesbian Rights (search), said "This is the first time any state supreme court in the country has made this ruling."

    The court followed its 2002 decision in which it said men who establish themselves as parental figures may become legal fathers even if they did not help conceive the child.

    "These legal principles apply with equal force in this case," Justice Joyce Kennard wrote in a concurring opinion in a case ordering a lesbian woman to support her former lover's twins. Being a legal parent, Kennard added, "brings with it the benefits as well as the responsibilities."

    Emily B., the El Dorado County woman whose former lover, Elisa B., must now pay to support the children, said she might be able to get off of welfare now.

    "I'm absolutely overjoyed today," she said.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,166444,00.html
     
  2. Nuc
    Offline

    Nuc Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2005
    Messages:
    2,377
    Thanks Received:
    140
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Sydney, Australia
    Ratings:
    +141
    The court usually places what it considers to be the child's best interest first and this is in the child's best interest. Good decision.
     
  3. archangel
    Online

    archangel Guest

    Ratings:
    +0

    be a good decision..it may...just may... put a damper on all this "Gay Marriage" nonsense...now that they will be hit in the old pocket book...maybe they will be less likely to want to play! Well at least for those who magically come out of the so called "Closet" after many years of marriage in a hetro marriage with children under wing! As for the rest they will just go back to parties galore in the bath houses!
     

Share This Page