Bystander Sues City of Pittsburg Over LRAD

Discussion in 'Law and Justice System' started by SAT, Nov 18, 2011.

  1. SAT
    Offline

    SAT BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2011
    Messages:
    830
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +43
    Bystander Sues City of Pittsburgh Over Pain and Hearing Loss Caused by Use of Long Range Acoustic Device at G-20 Protest :: American Civil Liberties Union of Pennsylvania

     
  2. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,104
    Thanks Received:
    9,264
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,387
    People with mucus between their ears should avoid these gatherings.
     
  3. whitehall
    Offline

    whitehall Gold Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    27,759
    Thanks Received:
    4,331
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +10,707
    Who do her students sue when they become nauseous and dizzy after listening to her lectures?
     
  4. SAT
    Offline

    SAT BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2011
    Messages:
    830
    Thanks Received:
    43
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +43
    OK, so that's two votes for a powerful police presence that comes down hard on people exercising their first amendment rights.

    And I bet they both claim to be advocates for the Bill of Rights. :lmao:
     
  5. Katzndogz
    Offline

    Katzndogz Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2011
    Messages:
    65,659
    Thanks Received:
    7,418
    Trophy Points:
    1,830
    Ratings:
    +8,337
    There are no bystanders on a battlefield.
     
  6. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Then there'd be no one at the gatherings.
     
  7. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,518
    Thanks Received:
    5,898
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,928
    The premise of the law suit is flawed. The argument that weapons or devices developed for the military can not and should not be used by the police is illogical and unsupported by facts.

    Further the argument that the device in question some how violates first amendment rights is also flawed.
     

Share This Page