CrusaderFrank
Diamond Member
- May 20, 2009
- 148,629
- 71,935
- 2,330
But Solyandra....
But Tesla...
But Tesla...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The question isn't just why American jobs are being lost. But what can be done to create new jobs for all the people that need a job.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".You ask me to prove something I've proven many times and then you slander and attack me. Which, of course, makes you an A$$ Whole.1. You are correct that such incentive shopping around should be stopped, at least internally in the US.
2. If you have any real reason to believe that the jobs will not be forthcoming present it. A photo showing a small section of a factory, is not it. For all we know, there are hundreds of people out of frame.
3. YOur pretense that you care about the people of Alabama is noted, laughed at and dismissed.
I don't get your kind. I really don't. It's so easy to look stuff up and you want to be spoon fed. Where do you work? Wal Mart?
10 Auto Industry Jobs that Will Die Due to Automation
The Digital Automotive Factory Arrives | Automation World
This was a year ago. Many jobs have already been lost.
Go ahead, it's your turn to apologize.
From your link.
"It’s only a matter of time before robotics will be perfected as technologies advance, and once again, the workers will be replaced with automation."
Going away eventually is not the same as not being created.
Being concerned with, and discussing the long term effects of the coming age of robotics and AI is completely valid.
Using that long term issue as an excuse to dismiss or attack efforts to get jobs for people in the short term is not.
And I've seen too many lefties slandering and marginalizing Southerns in general, and Alabama specifically to take any leftie's stated concern at face value.
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Solyndra?But Solyandra....
But Tesla...
Solyndra?But Solyandra....
But Tesla...
Oh, Bush. I almost forgot.
Did the program that funded the Solyndra loan start under George W. Bush?
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".You ask me to prove something I've proven many times and then you slander and attack me. Which, of course, makes you an A$$ Whole.1. You are correct that such incentive shopping around should be stopped, at least internally in the US.
2. If you have any real reason to believe that the jobs will not be forthcoming present it. A photo showing a small section of a factory, is not it. For all we know, there are hundreds of people out of frame.
3. YOur pretense that you care about the people of Alabama is noted, laughed at and dismissed.
I don't get your kind. I really don't. It's so easy to look stuff up and you want to be spoon fed. Where do you work? Wal Mart?
10 Auto Industry Jobs that Will Die Due to Automation
The Digital Automotive Factory Arrives | Automation World
This was a year ago. Many jobs have already been lost.
Go ahead, it's your turn to apologize.
From your link.
"It’s only a matter of time before robotics will be perfected as technologies advance, and once again, the workers will be replaced with automation."
Going away eventually is not the same as not being created.
Being concerned with, and discussing the long term effects of the coming age of robotics and AI is completely valid.
Using that long term issue as an excuse to dismiss or attack efforts to get jobs for people in the short term is not.
And I've seen too many lefties slandering and marginalizing Southerns in general, and Alabama specifically to take any leftie's stated concern at face value.
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".You ask me to prove something I've proven many times and then you slander and attack me. Which, of course, makes you an A$$ Whole.
I don't get your kind. I really don't. It's so easy to look stuff up and you want to be spoon fed. Where do you work? Wal Mart?
10 Auto Industry Jobs that Will Die Due to Automation
The Digital Automotive Factory Arrives | Automation World
This was a year ago. Many jobs have already been lost.
Go ahead, it's your turn to apologize.
From your link.
"It’s only a matter of time before robotics will be perfected as technologies advance, and once again, the workers will be replaced with automation."
Going away eventually is not the same as not being created.
Being concerned with, and discussing the long term effects of the coming age of robotics and AI is completely valid.
Using that long term issue as an excuse to dismiss or attack efforts to get jobs for people in the short term is not.
And I've seen too many lefties slandering and marginalizing Southerns in general, and Alabama specifically to take any leftie's stated concern at face value.
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
That's hilarious.Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".From your link.
"It’s only a matter of time before robotics will be perfected as technologies advance, and once again, the workers will be replaced with automation."
Going away eventually is not the same as not being created.
Being concerned with, and discussing the long term effects of the coming age of robotics and AI is completely valid.
Using that long term issue as an excuse to dismiss or attack efforts to get jobs for people in the short term is not.
And I've seen too many lefties slandering and marginalizing Southerns in general, and Alabama specifically to take any leftie's stated concern at face value.
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
That's hilarious.Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
If Republicans supported getting jobs for Americans, they would support education and job training for the record breaking 6.2 million unfilled jobs. Even you know that.
Survey: GOP business executives want immigrant workers, not voters
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".From your link.
"It’s only a matter of time before robotics will be perfected as technologies advance, and once again, the workers will be replaced with automation."
Going away eventually is not the same as not being created.
Being concerned with, and discussing the long term effects of the coming age of robotics and AI is completely valid.
Using that long term issue as an excuse to dismiss or attack efforts to get jobs for people in the short term is not.
And I've seen too many lefties slandering and marginalizing Southerns in general, and Alabama specifically to take any leftie's stated concern at face value.
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
That's hilarious.Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
If Republicans supported getting jobs for Americans, they would support education and job training for the record breaking 6.2 million unfilled jobs. Even you know that.
Survey: GOP business executives want immigrant workers, not voters
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
I keep asking this simple and serious question, and all I get is bullshit.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itIgnoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
I keep asking this simple and serious question, and all I get is bullshit.
Only because liberal policies are bad for jobs, bad for the economy.
Jail employers who leave for cheaper wages.That's hilarious.Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itIgnoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
If Republicans supported getting jobs for Americans, they would support education and job training for the record breaking 6.2 million unfilled jobs. Even you know that.
Survey: GOP business executives want immigrant workers, not voters
Yeah, we've all seen you attack anything and everything that republicans do. We know you do that.
I've asked you a simple question.
What pro job policies would you support?
equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will; it is an Individual problem not an Institutional problem.Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itDepends on how you define "perfected".
87% of lost manufacturing jobs are already lost. "Perfected" is when they are all gone.
Is that what you are looking forward to? When they are all gone?
Robots have been taking American jobs
Researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Boston University surveyed robots' impact on the U.S. labor market between 1990 and 2007, thereby avoiding data abnormalities from the mass job losses seen during the Great Recession.
They found "large and robust negative effects of robots on employment and wages" across local economies impacted by automation.
---------
See that? All the way back to 1990.
Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
I keep asking this simple and serious question, and all I get is bullshit.
equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will; it is an Individual problem not an Institutional problem.Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do itIgnoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it, does not solve anyone's problems.
DO you have an answer, or do you just bring this up, when a republican might get some credit for something and you want to minimize it?
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
I keep asking this simple and serious question, and all I get is bullshit.
I am for actually solving some simple, socioeconomic problems. Our drug war solves nothing.equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will; it is an Individual problem not an Institutional problem.Ignoring a potentially good job, because some day a robot will do it
Since I never said that, what is it? Some kind of conspiracy? Something imagined? Some pointless point?
You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
I keep asking this simple and serious question, and all I get is bullshit.
Please do not swamp this thread in your meaningless blather.
I am for actually solving some simple, socioeconomic problems. Our drug war solves nothing.equal protection of the law regarding the legal concept of employment at will; it is an Individual problem not an Institutional problem.You attacked the very idea of encouraging manufacturing jobs, because they won't happen or they will go away.
And you again refused to answer the question.
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
WHAT PRO JOB POLICIES WOULD YOU SUPPORT?
The only pro job policies liberals support is more unemployment/welfare benefits and higher taxes.
I keep asking this simple and serious question, and all I get is bullshit.
Please do not swamp this thread in your meaningless blather.