hjmick
Diamond Member
George Washington named Britain's greatest ever foe - Telegraph
America, Fuck Yeah!
Wait... Technically he was British...
America, Fuck Yeah!
Wait... Technically he was British...
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Meh. Emperor Claudius would have been a better choice. I don't recall George Washington invading England and enslaving the population he didn't slaughter.
Meh. Emperor Claudius would have been a better choice. I don't recall George Washington invading England and enslaving the population he didn't slaughter.
Although, to be fair, the Romans did bring civilisation.
Meh. Emperor Claudius would have been a better choice. I don't recall George Washington invading England and enslaving the population he didn't slaughter.
Although, to be fair, the Romans did bring civilisation.
I heard that.... when exactly did y'all become uncivilized again... because I know your country... y'all ain't very civilized.
Meh. Emperor Claudius would have been a better choice. I don't recall George Washington invading England and enslaving the population he didn't slaughter.
Although, to be fair, the Romans did bring civilisation.
Meh. Emperor Claudius would have been a better choice. I don't recall George Washington invading England and enslaving the population he didn't slaughter.
Although, to be fair, the Romans did bring civilisation.
Britain had civilization prior to the arrival of the Romans, bub.
Although, to be fair, the Romans did bring civilisation.
I heard that.... when exactly did y'all become uncivilized again... because I know your country... y'all ain't very civilized.
Er, chucking-out time.
i have considerable respect for Washington, but if they're talking about enemy generals, I think Napoleon really has to top the list, or perhaps William of Normandy if you want to restrict it to foes who actually won their wars.
So? There was "civilization" within Britain prior to the Romans' arrival.
i have considerable respect for Washington, but if they're talking about enemy generals, I think Napoleon really has to top the list, or perhaps William of Normandy if you want to restrict it to foes who actually won their wars.
i have considerable respect for Washington, but if they're talking about enemy generals, I think Napoleon really has to top the list, or perhaps William of Normandy if you want to restrict it to foes who actually won their wars.
Napoleon was a foe of much of Europe and even Russia though not particularity of England. Though I'd concede, if more successful, he eventually could have been the greater foe.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUJsYLiizvU]ABBA : Waterloo (Momarkedet 1975) HQ - YouTube[/ame]
My guess is the voters decided England lost more in the colonies due to Washington than was lost due to Napoleon's er... shenanigans.
So? There was "civilization" within Britain prior to the Romans' arrival.
So? There was "civilization" within Britain prior to the Romans' arrival.
What civilization? The natives burned folks alive in wicker cages for hoots.
i have considerable respect for Washington, but if they're talking about enemy generals, I think Napoleon really has to top the list, or perhaps William of Normandy if you want to restrict it to foes who actually won their wars.
Napoleon was a foe of much of Europe and even Russia though not particularity of England. Though I'd concede, if more successful, he eventually could have been the greater foe.
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MUJsYLiizvU]ABBA : Waterloo (Momarkedet 1975) HQ - YouTube[/ame]
My guess is the voters decided England lost more in the colonies due to Washington than was lost due to Napoleon's er... shenanigans.
Rommel