Clarify what I am missing here, as I'm slightly confused and a bit under the weather.

The fact she sent that suggests she wanted to protect herself AND Obama. She could say "I took notes on the meeting and Obama and he didn't want any funny stuff". So if and when the funny stuff is found out as it is being found out now, she can refer to email as some sort of evidence. On the day of inauguration at that. Is this an accurate assessment?

When you consider how much effort the MSM is going through to avoid even discussing the allegations and efforts, it's clear, this could very well go down as a full court coup. The efforts of an administration to not only steal the election from it's citizens, but to maintain control of the courts and continue this charade for a reelection of Hillary and beyond. All while destroying America for International interests and developing a two tier system of rulers and underclass dependent serfs.

In the Free World on the top of my had I can only think of one situation in history which would have been worse, and that was the French Foreign Legion planning to kill their leader (De Gaulle I think?) in the 1950's, and they were thwarted. They believed they were protecting France, as some believed they were protecting America from some threat. That threat was a businessman, anti-Establishment president.

This has the hallmarks of being even worse than even the attempted in France, as the long term potential was to basically open up the borders to anyone, destroy the U.S courts, alter the Constitution and do God knows what. Consider how much Clinton and her pals have gotten away with, America is not a nation of Kings. They wanted to turn America into a weak, European cuckhold nation and playground for International socialist crooks.

People must be held to account, there is no other way forward, IF any or all of what I believe has happened has in fact happened. If I'm wrong, then someone advise accordingly so I can remove my tinfoil hat.


People must held to account- for the President telling everyone that law enforcement must do its job.

LOL

Imagine if Obama had fired the FBI Director or suggested that the investigation be stopped- or started.........you know imagine if Obama had acted like Trump.
 
The point is why did she feel,the need to send the email?.
a

Because its an easy way to take notes.

I send myself emails on meetings I have attended as a quick easy way to both record the notes from the meeting and to have an approximate date in a searchable format.

What I love is that you contards- who slurp up Trump's open lies to you all the time- just assume that Rice's words- mean the exact opposite of what she said.
 
Maybe the email was her insurance-revenge for Barack not leaving his wife.
:)
 
Obama: I'd like a meeting with you in secret to NOT in any way discuss spying on Trump.
Comey: What meeting?
Obama: Exactly.
Rice: Should I take meeting notes?
Obama: Yes definitely.

:eusa_think:...:auiqs.jpg:
 
Obama: I like a meeting with you in secret to NOT in any way discuss spying on Trump.
Comey: What meeting?
Obama: Exactly.
Rice: Should I take meeting notes?
Obama: Yes definitely.

:eusa_think:...:auiqs.jpg:
This was an admission that they knew they had committed crimes and was a way to try and distance Obama's involvement....

There is only one reason to memorialize a meeting 15 days after it happened and focus on this limited area... and on the last day of your job...
 
Last edited:
Obama: I like a meeting with you in secret to NOT in any way discuss spying on Trump.
Comey: What meeting?
Obama: Exactly.
Rice: Should I take meeting notes?
Obama: Yes definitely.

:eusa_think:...:auiqs.jpg:
This was an admission that they new they had committed crimes and was a way to try and distance Obama's involvement....

The Obama administration got caught red handed. Here's where it went south, the FBI's informant started leaking to the press and this tipped off Trump and his team that they were being surveilled. This meeting and this odd email to herself has the stench of cover up and deniability.
 
Susan Rice, Eric Holder and Barack Obama, the three best reasons known to permanently ban so-called Affirmative Action


All three of these treasonous bigots care not about the US, truth, or justice.

They just care about stealing as much as they can for their party....
These people were elected not hire by a company...
 
Their letter-
February 8, 2018

VIA ELECTRONIC TRANSMISSION

The Honorable Susan Rice
Senior Fellow, Belfer Center
Harvard University
79 John F. Kennedy Street
Cambridge, MA 02138

c/o
Kathryn Ruemmler, Esq.
Latham and Watkins LLP
555 Eleventh Street NW
Washington, DC 20004

Dear Ambassador Rice:

The Senate Judiciary Committee has a constitutional duty to conduct oversight of the FBI and the broader Department of Justice. Part of that duty involves ensuring that law enforcement efforts are conducted without improper political influence. Accordingly, the Committee has been investigating the FBI’s relationship with Christopher Steele during the time his work was funded by Hillary for America and the Democratic National Committee, as well as the FBI’s reliance on his unverified third-hand allegations in the Bureau’s representations to courts.

As part of that effort, the Committee sent a request to the National Archives for records of meetings between President Obama and then-FBI Director Comey regarding the FBI’s investigation of allegations of collusion between associates of Mr. Trump and the Russian government. In response, the Committee received classified and unclassified versions of an email you sent to yourself on January 20, 2017 – President Trump’s inauguration day. If the timestamp is correct, you sent this email to yourself at 12:15pm, presumably a very short time before you departed the White House for the last time.

In this email to yourself, you purport to document a meeting that had taken place more than two weeks before, on January 5, 2017. You wrote:

On January 5, following a briefing by IC leadership on Russian hacking during the 2016 Presidential election, President Obama had a brief follow-on conversation with FBI Director Jim Comey and Deputy Attorney General Sally Yates in the Oval Office. Vice President Biden and I were also present.
That meeting reportedly included a discussion of the Steele dossier and the FBI’s investigation of its claims.[1] Your email continued:

President Obama began the conversation by stressing his continued commitment to ensuring that every aspect of this issue is handled by the Intelligence and law enforcement communities “by the book”. The President stressed that he is not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective. He reiterated that our law enforcement team needs to proceed as it normally would by the book.

From a national security perspective, however, President Obama said he wants to be sure that, as we engage with the incoming team, we are mindful to ascertain if there is any reason that we cannot share information fully as it relates to Russia.

The next part of your email remains classified. After that, you wrote:

The President asked Comey to inform him if anything changes in the next few weeks that should affect how we share classified information with the incoming team. Comey said he would.

It strikes us as odd that, among your activities in the final moments on the final day of the Obama administration, you would feel the need to send yourself such an unusual email purporting to document a conversation involving President Obama and his interactions with the FBI regarding the Trump/Russia investigation. In addition, despite your claim that President Obama repeatedly told Mr. Comey to proceed “by the book,” substantial questions have arisen about whether officials at the FBI, as well as at the Justice Department and the State Department, actually did proceed “by the book.”

In order for the Committee to further assess the situation, please respond to the following by February 22, 2018:

  1. Did you send the email attached to this letter to yourself? Do you have any reason to dispute the timestamp of the email


    When did you first become aware of the FBI’s investigation into allegations of collusion between Mr. Trump’s associates and Russia?

  1. When did you become aware of any surveillance activities, including FISA applications, undertaken by the FBI in conducting that investigation? At the time you wrote this email to yourself, were you aware of either the October 2016 FISA application for surveillance of Carter Page or the January 2017 renewal?

  1. Did anyone instruct, request, suggest, or imply that you should send yourself the aforementioned Inauguration Day email memorializing President Obama’s meeting with Mr. Comey about the Trump/Russia investigation? If so, who and why?

  1. Is the account of the January 5, 2017 meeting presented in your email accurate? Did you omit any other portions of the conversation?

  1. Other than that email, did you document the January 5, 2017 meeting in any way, such as contemporaneous notes or a formal memo? To the best of your knowledge, did anyone else at that meeting take notes or otherwise memorialize the meeting?

  1. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey or Ms. Yates mention potential press coverage of the Steele dossier? If so, what did they say?

  1. During the meeting, did Mr. Comey describe the status of the FBI’s relationship with Mr. Steele, or the basis for that status?

  1. When and how did you first become aware of the allegations made by Christopher Steele?

  1. When and how did you first become aware that the Clinton Campaign and the Democratic National Committee funded Mr. Steele’s efforts?

  1. You wrote that President Obama stressed that he was “not asking about, initiating or instructing anything from a law enforcement perspective.” Did President Obama ask about, initiate, or instruct anything from any other perspective relating to the FBI’s investigation?

  1. Did President Obama have any other meetings with Mr. Comey, Ms. Yates, or other government officials about the FBI’s investigation of allegations of collusion between Trump associates and Russia? If so, when did these occur, who participated, and what was discussed?

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. Please contact Patrick Davis of Chairman Grassley’s staff at (202) 224-5225 or Lee Holmes of Chairman Graham’s staff at (202) 224-5972 if you have any questions.

Sincerely,


Charles E. Grassley Lindsey O. Graham
Chairman Chairman
Committee on the Judiciary Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism
Committee on the Judiciary

Enclosure: as stated.

cc: The Honorable Dianne Feinstein
Ranking Member
Committee on the Judiciary

The Honorable Sheldon Whitehouse
Ranking Member
Subcommittee on Crime and Terrorism
Committee on the Judiciary

Grassley, Graham Uncover ‘Unusual Email’ Sent by Susan Rice to Herself on President Trump’s Inauguration Day | Chuck Grassley

For some weird reason all questions in copy and paste formatted with all 1’s here
 
And she screwed the pooch as it had been stated they had never discussed the investigation, if I recall correctly.
Obama: I like a meeting with you in secret to NOT in any way discuss spying on Trump.
Comey: What meeting?
Obama: Exactly.
Rice: Should I take meeting notes?
Obama: Yes definitely.

:eusa_think:...:auiqs.jpg:
This was an admission that they knew they had committed crimes and was a way to try and distance Obama's involvement....

There is only one reason to memorialize a meeting 15 days after it happened and focus on this limited area... and on the last day of your job...
 
Yep, their emails suggested that-


“I have been told tonight by a number of sources … that McCabe may have asked FBI agents to actually change their 302s,” Carter told host Sean Hannity.

The 302 form contains information from the notes an FBI agent takes during an interview of a subject. It is used by FBI agents to “report or summarize the interviews that they conduct.”

“So basically every time an FBI agent interviews a witness, they have to go back and file a report,”Carter explained.





 
Everyone, read Steve's link in the OP.

Once again, he is lying.


Well, "lying: implies that he has some functioning brain cells left......The more likely conclusion that one can make, is that Stevie is too fucking DUMB to understand something beyond the headline of a biased article.
 
This memo proves OBAMA LIED.

OBAMA said he had nothing to do with it.

In fact, he had Comey in his office discussing it.

Time to realize Obama is a traitor and that the Russia investigation is a left wing coup attempt....

And this memo just shows that Obama had nothing to do with it- other than to tell law enforcement to do their job.

Hey- but good job of trying to spin the GOP propaganda points! A True Trumpster!
Except the book was thrown out the window and Congress was not properly notified as specified by law
 
All agents are regularly trained and coached on doing excellent notes.

Nothing new here, people, except typical pro-Trump hatred for a great FBI.
 
This memo proves OBAMA LIED.

OBAMA said he had nothing to do with it.

In fact, he had Comey in his office discussing it.

Time to realize Obama is a traitor and that the Russia investigation is a left wing coup attempt....

And this memo just shows that Obama had nothing to do with it- other than to tell law enforcement to do their job.

Hey- but good job of trying to spin the GOP propaganda points! A True Trumpster!

.....Because we all send emails to ourselves trumping those around us.
 
And she screwed the pooch as it had been stated they had never discussed the investigation, if I recall correctly.
Obama: I like a meeting with you in secret to NOT in any way discuss spying on Trump.
Comey: What meeting?
Obama: Exactly.
Rice: Should I take meeting notes?
Obama: Yes definitely.

:eusa_think:...:auiqs.jpg:
This was an admission that they knew they had committed crimes and was a way to try and distance Obama's involvement....

There is only one reason to memorialize a meeting 15 days after it happened and focus on this limited area... and on the last day of your job...
3 different times she swore under oath they had no meetings.... I believe Comey also made that statement..
 

Forum List

Back
Top