Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Her numerous injudicious remarks say she needs to be removed. And if she isn't Trump then has an excellent appeal.
Her numerous injudicious remarks say she needs to be removed. And if she isn't Trump then has an excellent appeal.
Almost as funny as the Hispanic lawyer Trump wanted dropped.
Almost as funny as the Hispanic lawyer Trump wanted dropped.
Absolutely. If a juror made such a comment, she would never be seated on the jury. Why should a judge who wants him imprisoned serve as judge?She said Trump is free but should not be. That one statement should disqualify her.
Her numerous injudicious remarks say she needs to be removed. And if she isn't Trump then has an excellent appeal.
So all the judges in DC have already found Trump guilty?If Judge Cannon recuses herself first....then maybe his request for this D.C. judge will not be laughed at so hard....
it's not like any other judge in D.C. or anywhere, would do anything differently than she has done or Trump would fair any better with another judge in D.C.....except maybe Judge Cannon who is Goo goo gah gahed with Trump.... Who seems utterly clueless on how to be a Judge.....or present herself as a Judge imo.
You gave me a fake news on my post. But show me any jurisdiction that has brought charges against Trump et al that is NOT a George Soros funded prosecutor. Or any presiding judge that you approve of who is not Soros backed.If Judge Cannon recuses herself first....then maybe his request for this D.C. judge will not be laughed at so hard....
it's not like any other judge in D.C. or anywhere, would do anything differently than she has done or Trump would fair any better with another judge in D.C.....except maybe Judge Cannon who is Goo goo gah gahed with Trump.... Who seems utterly clueless on how to be a Judge.....or present herself as a Judge imo.
Is this the case with the disgraced prosecutor? Smith? The entire case is based on a lie, and should be dismissed altogether.So all the judges in DC have already found Trump guilty?
As a general rule, the judge who is presiding is the one who makes the decision. In this case, to be plain, she makes the calm about her own alleged bias.Absolutely. If a juror made such a comment, she would never be seated on the jury. Why should a judge who wants him imprisoned serve as judge?
My question is: which DC official makes the decision?
Really? So, according to you, everyone including Trump's own lawyers, know he's guilty? Do you live in America?She will not be recused.
Just as Trump's attempt to get Bragg recused, it will be denied.
This is simply a tactic used by defense lawyers who know their client is going to lose and be convicted, as an out to later try to give reason for an appeal...
Judges do not find defendants guilty or not guilty silly one, a jury made up of 12 do.So all the judges in DC have already found Trump guilty?
Maybe read the motions provided in the OP…it spells out her biasSpell out her bias and explain it to dear leader.
Oh, never mind. There isn't any.
So a biased judge gets to decide whether she’s biased? That sounds soooooo fair. But you’re right: more grounds for the appeal.As a general rule, the judge who is presiding is the one who makes the decision. In this case, to be plain, she makes the calm about her own alleged bias.
She can be (and plainly is) as biased as fuck. But she has the authority to say, “no. I can be and will be ‘fair.’”
No conscious person will believe it. But that won’t matter.