jon_berzerk
Platinum Member
- Mar 5, 2013
- 31,401
- 7,369
- 1,130
woops , sorry JON !! --- guess you and I found pretty much at the same time .
we will see many more of these folks following the will of alla
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
woops , sorry JON !! --- guess you and I found pretty much at the same time .
Way to go out on a limb. What tipped you off that more nutcase Muslims would do something somewhere in the future?woops , sorry JON !! --- guess you and I found pretty much at the same time .
we will see many more of these folks following the will of alla
It is hard to fathom why liberals are justifying the horrific acts muslimd are doing.
yeah maybe , course they are just reading their book or being taught in the wrong way !!
It is hard to fathom why liberals are justifying the horrific acts muslimd are doing. They just are. As muslim atrocities multiply liberals will work harder to justify more.
Good read:
Call Oklahoma beheading what it is: Terrorism
[QUOTE]
Editor's note: Mel Robbins, a CNN commentator and legal analyst, is the founder of Inspire52.com, a news and entertainment site for women, and author of "Stop Saying You're Fine," about managing change. She speaks on leadership around the world and in 2014 was named outstanding news talk radio host by the Gracie Awards. Follow her on Twitter @melrobbins. The opinions expressed in this commentary are solely those of the author.
(CNN) -- Colleen Hufford, 54, was beheaded by Alton Nolen during a surprise attack at a Vaughan Foods plant in Oklahoma last week, according to police. Thankfully, before the terrorist -- yes, terrorist -- could behead another victim, Traci Johnson, he was shot by the company's CEO, Mark Vaughan, who is also a deputy sheriff.
The terrorist survived. Hufford, a wife, mother, and grandmother, did not. Her husband of 25 years was outside Vaughan Foods that afternoon, waiting to pick her up as he did every day, when he learned she was the victim of a terrorist attack.
It was a terrorist attack, and everyone knows it. Why won't the government say so? The Washington Post reports that the FBI found "no indication that Alton Alexander Nolen was copying the beheadings of journalists in Syria by the Islamic State ... adding that they are treating this as an incident of workplace violence."
Workplace violence? You can't be serious! Oh wait -- the FBI must mean "workplace violence" as in the case of Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the terrorist convicted in the 2009 Fort Hood shooting that killed 13 people and left many more wounded. Oh yeah, I remember that extremist attack carried out by a "soldier of Allah" -- but that's just workplace violence. It doesn't mean anything that Hasan is writing letters from death row to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi, begging to become a citizen of the self-procaimed Islamic State. Just a guy who got angry at work.
Prosecutor likely to seek death penalty
How dumb do you think we are? Fort Hood was an act of terrorism, the beheading of Hufford was an act of terrorism, and it's time the FBI, the President, and all of us started calling it that.
There are three reasons. First, it's important to give this barbaric crime the label it begs for -- not just because of the charges it should carry and the punishment that should be handed down, but because it's important, at every turn, to draw a very clear distinction between ISIS extremists and the silent majority of Muslims who are just as horrified as non-Muslim Americans
More than 100 Muslim clerics and scholars just condemned ISIS, outlining in 17 pages why ISIS' actions are an "offense to Islam, Muslims and to the entire world." They, too, are unfairly tarnished with every barbaric, terrorist act performed in the name of their religion.
Second, it's essential if we want to win the war on terror that we understand how technology has changed that war since 9/11.
President Obama admitted that the United States "underestimated" ISIS. And in his speech before the United Nations, he described ISIS as a "network of death" that must be defeated. I agree. And this "network of death" has managed to reach beyond the confines of Syria and the Middle East.
MORE: Call Oklahoma beheading what it is Terrorism Opinion - CNN.com
[/QUOTE]
You HAVE an ideological war. Islam is not a religion.Yes but you say Islam. Shouldn't you really be saying some evil groups that claim to be Islamic? We don't want a religious war, history has proven that.
One of the dumbest things anyone can ever do is to compare Christianity (ANYTHING it ever did) with Islam, when it comes to genocide. Compared to Islam, no religion, nation, cult, or ideology even comes close to Islam's horrific record. PLUS, now in 2014, it is Islam that is the aggressor, around the world (ISIS, Hamas, Al Shabbab, Boko Haram, etc) not Chrisitianity, or nations of the West.Yes for gold, silver, territory... Things you can hold and see, things of value. But not for religion. Charlemagne for example went to war with many to change their religion.
NONSENSE! For centuries European countries sent armies to places to conquers for gold, silver, and glory. Christian missionaries also went, and they were slaughtered mercilessly by the native inhabitants, including in the western hemisphere.Don't forget Christianity spread through Europe by fire and sword. The European barbarians didn't willingly change religions. In fact I believe Christians to be the first to force their religion on others. Previous to that I don't recall any sort of religious wars.
Christians and Muslims have both gone off the deep end at one time or another. During the Crusades Christians slaughtered Muslims with the blessings of the church. Thousands of non-Christians were tortured and killed during the Inquisitions. Christian Serbs massacred hundreds of thousand of Muslims. In Iraq, the America who was supposedly founded on Christian values killed 100,000 to 150,000 Muslim civilians.