Branding The Youth Vote: 'Social Justice'

OK, so, conservatives don't want

1. the youth vote
2. the women's vote
3. the black vote
4. the labor vote
5. the gay vote
6. the pro-choice vote
7. the Hispanic vote
8. the Jewish vote
9. the Asian vote...

...what vote DO you people want????????
 
Ya hear that college students? RWers think you don't know anything! Who are you gonna vote for now? :D

Had you ever been on a college campus Cruella, you'd have a chance at grasping the irony of your post.

Actually, had you spent more time in your third grade classroom, you might not be a leftist.....

If conservatives want different sorts of colleges, they should invest in them.
 
If conservatives want different sorts of colleges, they should invest in them.

They have.

University of Phoenix is now the largest single educational provider in the nation. While not particularly conservative, they DO focus on education rather than leftist indoctrination.

Grand Canyon University is not only more conservative, it is "horrors to the leftists" Christian.

The collapse of the greedy leftist educational racket has led to a host of new breed entries, that mostly focus on a quality education and leave the social indoctrination to the old school Ivy League and government run schools.
 
Younger people just look stupid to conservatives because they disagree with conservatives on so much,

and conservatives are afflicted with the delusion that they themselves are the smartest people on earth.

Well that, and they are incapable of constructing an English sentence, solving a simple algebra problem, or naming the capital of most states. Few would be able to correctly answer that the emancipation proclamation did not free the slaves, fewer still that Lincoln was a Republican.
 
OK, so, conservatives don't want

1. the youth vote
2. the women's vote
3. the black vote
4. the labor vote
5. the gay vote
6. the pro-choice vote
7. the Hispanic vote
8. the Jewish vote
9. the Asian vote...

...what vote DO you people want????????
They want the white male property owner only vote, along with a time machine to go back to 1800.
 
OK, so, conservatives don't want

1. the youth vote
2. the women's vote
3. the black vote
4. the labor vote
5. the gay vote
6. the pro-choice vote
7. the Hispanic vote
8. the Jewish vote
9. the Asian vote...

...what vote DO you people want????????
They want the white male property owner only vote, along with a time machine to go back to 1800.

It's weird.
 
Younger people just look stupid to conservatives because they disagree with conservatives on so much,

and conservatives are afflicted with the delusion that they themselves are the smartest people on earth.

Well that, and they are incapable of constructing an English sentence, solving a simple algebra problem, or naming the capital of most states. Few would be able to correctly answer that the emancipation proclamation did not free the slaves, fewer still that Lincoln was a Republican.

I never had that problem. Did you? Are you suggesting that liberals like me were simply extraordinarily superior in intelligence to the average young person?

I knew all the capitals when I was 10. I got an A in algebra. And in history. Repeatedly.
 
[

I never had that problem. Did you? Are you suggesting that liberals like me were simply extraordinarily superior in intelligence to the average young person?

I knew all the capitals when I was 10. I got an A in algebra. And in history. Repeatedly.

Whether you had that problem is irrelevant, the fact is that most students on college campuses can do none of these things.
 
OK, so, conservatives don't want

1. the youth vote
2. the women's vote
3. the black vote
4. the labor vote
5. the gay vote
6. the pro-choice vote
7. the Hispanic vote
8. the Jewish vote
9. the Asian vote...

...what vote DO you people want????????
They want the white male property owner only vote, along with a time machine to go back to 1800.

It's weird.

See how the far left drones follow their religious programming without question or hesitation.
 
Younger people just look stupid to conservatives because they disagree with conservatives on so much,

and conservatives are afflicted with the delusion that they themselves are the smartest people on earth.

Well that, and they are incapable of constructing an English sentence, solving a simple algebra problem, or naming the capital of most states. Few would be able to correctly answer that the emancipation proclamation did not free the slaves, fewer still that Lincoln was a Republican.

I never had that problem. Did you? Are you suggesting that liberals like me were simply extraordinarily superior in intelligence to the average young person?

I knew all the capitals when I was 10. I got an A in algebra. And in history. Repeatedly.

You are not a liberal, you are a far left drone, you drones make bible thumpers look like the most open minded people on the planet..
 
1.The very Liberal HuffPo was quite concerned with the youth vote in 2014.
"The election of President Obama in 2008 showed record numbers of young people turning out to vote, ... The 111th Congress elected in 2009 by a highly engaged youth electorate ...

This Congress is in stark contrast to the legislature we elected in 2012, a congress which only 45 percent of young people aged 18-29 actually voted for in the 2012 election.

John Zoby wrote in Forbes magazine of the growing might of the millennial generation, declaring "millennials could determine the fate of the Senate."
Millennials make up 14-15 percent of the electorate ..."
Why Millennials Need To Take Back the Midterms Matthew Keating

a. "21.5% of young people, ages 18-29, voted in the 2014 midterm elections, .... a slight increase from the 20.9% youth voter turnout in 2010....13%of votes cast in the 2014 midterm elections were cast by young people, ages 18-29.

Overall, young voters in 2014 favored Democratic Congressional candidates over Republicans.... by 55% to 42%. Young voters also backed Democratic candidates in most Senate races." CIRCLE Youth Voting






2. Younger voters are important to the Liberals, the Leftists, largely because these younger voters don't know anything.
With limited life experience, they can be told anything...and they believe same.

Now....It is my considered perception that older Liberals, Leftists, really don't know much more...but have had far more time in the 'indoctrination tanning bed.'

This is what I mean:
Young people support Barack Obama, in spite of the fact that his policies have caused youth unemployment to skyrocket.

a. "Young America’s Foundation has released its Youth Misery Index (YMI) numbers for 2014, and it’s a record high of 106.5. The Youth Misery Index (YMI) is calculated by adding youth unemployment, student loan debt, and national debt (per capita) numbers.
Youth unemployment in 2014 was 18.1 percent (18.1 on YMI), with almost six million young people between the ages of 16 and 24 not in school or work. "
Youth Misery Index Grows More than 50 Under Obama Administration - Breitbart





3. How did it get this way?
Youth are a captive audience under the direction of their teachers and professors. Joseph Schumpeter explained that these intellectuals speak knowledgeably, yet have no actual experience. This, in itself, is laughable…unless one of them becomes the President.

a. “Intellectuals are in fact people who wield the power of the spoken word and the written word, and one of the touches that distinguish them from other people who do the same is the absence of direct responsibility for practical affairs. This touch in general accounts for another- the absence of that first hand knowledge of them which only actual experience can give.”
Joseph Schumpeter, “Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy,” p. 147.


Get that???
Teachers and professors who know nothing influence the youth under their control....
Talk about 'the blind leading the blind.'



And what those 'teachers and professors' 'speak knowledgeably ' about to the youth is the bogus concept called 'SOCIAL JUSTICE.'

"Social justice is the view that everyone deserves equal economic, political and social rights and opportunities."

vis a vis

Social Darwinism is the theory that individuals, groups, and peoples are subject to the same Darwinian laws of natural selection as plants and animals. Now largely discredited, social Darwinism was advocated by Herbert Spencer and others in the late 19th and early 20th centuries and was used to justify political conservatism, imperialism, and racism and to discourage intervention and reform.

Q. Does PoliticalChic support Social Justice or Social Darwinism?



Some folks are so abysmally dumb that they are easily tricked into believing whatever the Left wants them to.

That would be you that I've described.

There are no "Darwinian laws."

Your spin doesn't turn, and your post is both ridiculous and a non sequitur.



Sometimes you're simply dumb.....and other times dumb and disingenuous...today, the latter.

You give a bogus description of 'social justice,' leaving out the most slanderous elements.



Let's be very clear: you, and every other maladjusted anti-American who voted for Obama, effectively endorse each and every other aspect of 'social justice' education, as posted in this thread, and below:

“....social justice” today "generally equates with theadvocacy of more egalitarian access to income through state-sponsored redistribution.The phrase is also frequently used to justify new entitlement rights for individuals and whole categories of people, i.e., legally enforceable claims of individuals or groups against the state itself.

The concept of social justice to meliorate the unequal outcomes of capitalism became the basis for twentieth-centuryAmerican progressivism, which flowed .... from Herbert Croly’sThe Promise of American Life(1909). The progressive state redistributes wealth and other resources to achieve economic and social justice for the disadvantaged."Social Justice and the Academy National Association of Scholars

....devotees of Bismarck, whose top-down socialism made the middle class dependent on the state.

“…almost every single item on a checklist of fascist characteristicscan be found in ‘The Promise of American Life.’ The need to mobilize society like an army…spiritual rebirth…the need for ‘great’ revolutionary leaders…Reliance on manufactured, unifying, national ‘myths’…contempt for parliamentary democracy…non-Marxist socialism…Nationalism…A spiritual calling for military expansion…the need to make politics into a religion…hostility to individualism…”
Goldberg, “Liberal Fascism,” p. 98.

It is fascism, filtered through the prism of 'social justice,' that children are taught.

Nothing could be less American than the 'social justice' farrago drilled into the heads of our youth.

....social justice is “a shorthand for opposition to American traditions of individual justice and free-market economics,”...


“Proponents of social-justice teaching argue that American society is an inherently ‘oppressive’ society that is ‘systemically’ racist, ‘sexist,’ and ‘classist’and thus discriminates institutionally against women, nonwhites, working Americans, and the poor,...”

....indoctrination
along the lines of what an oppressive, racist, unjust nation America is.....

...."social justice" teaching,i.e., getting students to believe that they are victimsof an unjust, oppressive and racist America. After a few years of this indoctrination,young people are ripe targetsfor community organizers to mobilize them to vote and carry out "revolution."

....Ayers's socialist propaganda.....America is oppressive and unjust, that wealth and resources should be redistributed, and that only socialism can solve our problems. He speaks openly of his desire to use America's public school classrooms to train a generation of revolutionaries who will overturn the supposedly imperialistic regime of capitalist America.


..." "capitalist injustices," "critical race theory," "queer theory," and of course multiculturalism and feminism."

....that called for elementary school children to explore their sexual identities, for teachers to incorporate homosexual themes in grades K-5,...

....that advocate teaching acceptance of homosexuality in elementary school and kindergarten.

Google
 
Ya hear that college students? RWers think you don't know anything! Who are you gonna vote for now? :D

Had you ever been on a college campus Cruella, you'd have a chance at grasping the irony of your post.

Actually, had you spent more time in your third grade classroom, you might not be a leftist.....

If conservatives want different sorts of colleges, they should invest in them.



“The Death of Feminism,” by Phyllis Chesler:


1. Academic feminists who received tenure, promotion, and funding, tended to be pro-abortion, pro-pornography (anti-censorship), pro-prostitution (pro-sex workers), pro-surrogacy, and anti-colonialist, anti-imperialist, and anti-American…proponents of simplistic gender-neutrality (women and men are exactly the same) or essentialist: men and women are completely different, and women are better. They are loyal to their careers and their cliques, not to the truth. [In their writing, they] have pretended that brilliance and originality can best be conveyed in a secret, Mandarin language that absolutely no one, including themselves, can possibly understand…and this obfuscation of language has been employed to hide a considerable lack of brilliance and originality and to avoid the consequences of making oneself clear.

2. Liberals stamp out dissent by social and professional ostracism and legal discrimination. This is the modern version of methods used by medieval Christianity: a secular Inquisition.

a. Intelligentsia as grand inquisitors: in the media, universities, the law, political and professional groups. The dominating ideologies include anti-capitalism, feminism, multiculturalism, and environmentalism. They form the unchallengeable orthodoxy in academia. No challenges or deviations are permitted, and anyone who does not share these values is defined as extreme.

b. These ideologies have as their common theme the overturning of the established order of the West.

c. How ironic that intellectual liberty is assaulted within the institutions of reason.


Kirsten Powers just wrote a book about it.

"The Silencing: How the Left is Killing Free Speech"
 

Forum List

Back
Top