Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How about per your pseudo-medical gibberish the boy "should be drugged, later chopped to be a girl/eunuch with a surgical gash"? I'll take pseudo legal gibberish any day over pseudo-medical gibberish because the latter has more potential to do immediate proximate damage to the boy in question here.
I don't give a fuck how many corrupt doctors you line up behind your grotesque sex-cult experiments with children under the umbrella of "no hate!", Child abuse is child abuse no matter who does it or justifies it. All who participate are guilty.
Cries the poster who let it happen.And ^^ you both are here defending what happened to Tommy, the boy.
How about per your pseudo-medical gibberish the boy "should be drugged, later chopped to be a girl/eunuch with a surgical gash"? I'll take pseudo legal gibberish any day over pseudo-medical gibberish because the latter has more potential to do immediate proximate damage to the boy in question here.
I don't give a fuck how many corrupt doctors you line up behind your grotesque sex-cult experiments with children under the umbrella of "no hate!", Child abuse is child abuse no matter who does it or justifies it. All who participate are guilty.
Have the American Academy of Pediatrics or the APA had their presidents make a formal statement that they promote drugging children with hormones like Tommy in the OP? Or that this protocol leading to later amputation of his healthy organs is "perfectly fine protocol"? If they have, I'd like to see that link. Just because their many members are sitting silently on their hands, doesn't mean they approve.I'm not citing me. I'm citing the American Academy of Pediatrics and its 64,000 members, the APA and its 34,000 members, the child herself, the child's parents, her doctors, her mental health professionals.
And you're ignoring them all, insisting that you know better.
How about per your pseudo-medical gibberish the boy "should be drugged, later chopped to be a girl/eunuch with a surgical gash"? I'll take pseudo legal gibberish any day over pseudo-medical gibberish because the latter has more potential to do immediate proximate damage to the boy in question here.
I don't give a fuck how many corrupt doctors you line up behind your grotesque sex-cult experiments with children under the umbrella of "no hate!", Child abuse is child abuse no matter who does it or justifies it. All who participate are guilty.
Have the American Academy of Pediatrics or the APA had their presidents make a formal statement that they promote drugging children with hormones like Tommy in the OP?I'm not citing me. I'm citing the American Academy of Pediatrics and its 64,000 members, the APA and its 34,000 members, the child herself, the child's parents, her doctors, her mental health professionals.
And you're ignoring them all, insisting that you know better.
Or that this protocol leading to later amputation of his healthy organs is "perfectly fine protocol"? If they have, I'd like to see that link. Just because their many members are sitting silently on their hands, doesn't mean they approve.
Meanwhile the PRESIDENT of the American College of Pediatrics has spoken scathingly against the protocol, has called it child abuse. And, I have a link here: I’m a Pediatrician. How Transgender Ideology Has Infiltrated My Field and Produced Large-Scale Child Abuse.
Can you direct us to any links where the PRESIDENTS of either the AAP or the APA have either formally rebutted the ACP's president calling what they're doing to Tommy "child abuse"? I'd like to see what they had to say of record about drugging children in a manner meant to prepare them at the youngest of young adult ages to have healthy genitalia amputated.
Neither the AAP or the APA has found hormone therapy to be any form of child abuse.
And in all these years, you never did anything to help Tammy. How do you live with yourself?Neither the AAP or the APA has found hormone therapy to be any form of child abuse.
Link? Quotes? Rebuttal to the ACP President statements that it IS child abuse? She didn't mince words. The President of the American College of Pediatrics actually named what they're doing to the boy in the OP "child abuse".
Neither the AAP or the APA has found hormone therapy to be any form of child abuse.
Link? Quotes? Rebuttal to the ACP President statements that it IS child abuse? She didn't mince words. The President of the American College of Pediatrics actually named what they're doing to the boy in the OP "child abuse".
Neither the AAP or the APA has found hormone therapy to be any form of child abuse.
Link? Quotes? Rebuttal to the ACP President statements that it IS child abuse? She didn't mince words. The President of the American College of Pediatrics actually named what they're doing to the boy in the OP "child abuse".
Links? Quotes? Rebuttal from the APA or AAP? Repeating your talking points isn't a substitute for proving up on actual published rebuttal from the APA or AAP.The 'American College of Pediatrians' is a right wing hate group. It has a grand total of 60 members, all religious right wing fundamentalists. Why would I ignore the 34,000 members of the APA or the 64,000 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics on trans issues....
....and instead listen to a hate group with 60 members?
Explain it to us.
Pediatrician group speaks out against National Geographic’s 9-year old ‘trans’ cover “Affirming so called transgender children means sterilizing them as young as 11-years-old,” Dr Cretella told Lifesite News. “Puberty blockers plus cross-sex hormones causes permanent sterility. And biological girls who ‘transition’ to male by taking testosterone may have a double mastectomy at age 16. The life time use of cross-sex hormones also puts these children at risk for stroke, heart disease, diabetes, cancers and more.”
Neither the AAP or the APA has found hormone therapy to be any form of child abuse.
Link? Quotes? Rebuttal to the ACP President statements that it IS child abuse? She didn't mince words. The President of the American College of Pediatrics actually named what they're doing to the boy in the OP "child abuse".
Links? Quotes? Rebuttal from the APA or AAP? Repeating your talking points isn't a substitute for proving up on actual published rebuttal from the APA or AAP.The 'American College of Pediatrians' is a right wing hate group. It has a grand total of 60 members, all religious right wing fundamentalists. Why would I ignore the 34,000 members of the APA or the 64,000 members of the American Academy of Pediatrics on trans issues....
....and instead listen to a hate group with 60 members?
Explain it to us.
Meet the Anti-LGBT Hate Group that Filed an Amicus Brief with the Alabama Supreme Court
Meet the Anti-LGBT Hate Group that Filed an Amicus Brief with the Alabama Supreme Court
Don't get me wrong Skylar. I'm sure the media's long arm of influence has gotten well into the APA and the AAP. It's when they made it to National Geographic, ostensibly promoting this child abuse,
The ACP spoke up:
Pediatrician group speaks out against National Geographic’s 9-year old ‘trans’ cover “Affirming so called transgender children means sterilizing them as young as 11-years-old,” Dr Cretella told Lifesite News. “Puberty blockers plus cross-sex hormones causes permanent sterility. And biological girls who ‘transition’ to male by taking testosterone may have a double mastectomy at age 16. The life time use of cross-sex hormones also puts these children at risk for stroke, heart disease, diabetes, cancers and more.”
I want either of you, or your sidekick Syriusly, who wisely is avoiding this thread now, to tell me how what this doctor said about the permanent damage being done to these children "is untrue"? And, I'd like sources, links and quotes please.
Your rebuttals will have to include actual MDs putting their reputation on the line declaring that what's being done outlined in bold above "is not actually child abuse". And if they say the benefits outweigh the risks, I want statistics on how this is actually beneficial at the end of the day.
Otherwise, it is classic, textbook child abuse as defined by law in CA where this abuse was/is going on. As such, police there are now part of the conspiracy to abuse children in California if they have heard of the story, and refuse to act.
You may not like that the President of the American College of Pediatrics called out institutions like Stanford for doing institutionalized child abuse, but that's what happened. Real professionals are calling it child abuse. Now suddenly they're "not acceptable professionals"....? Pick and choose eh?
You may not like that the President of the American College of Pediatrics called out institutions like Stanford for doing institutionalized child abuse, but that's what happened. Real professionals are calling it child abuse. Now suddenly they're "not acceptable professionals"....? Pick and choose eh?
The 'American College of Pediatricians' is a hate group with 60 members. You still haven't explained why any rational person would ignore the APA and its 36,000 members or the American Academy of Pediatrics and its 64,000 members.....in favor of a hate group.
Until you do, you're stuck.
You may not like that the President of the American College of Pediatrics called out institutions like Stanford for doing institutionalized child abuse, but that's what happened. Real professionals are calling it child abuse. Now suddenly they're "not acceptable professionals"....? Pick and choose eh?
The 'American College of Pediatricians' is a hate group with 60 members. You still haven't explained why any rational person would ignore the APA and its 36,000 members or the American Academy of Pediatrics and its 64,000 members.....in favor of a hate group.
Until you do, you're stuck.
Because they're signing off on drugging and mutilating children? Again, with child abuse laws, there's no safety in numbers Manifest child abuse is manifest child abuse. And the President of the ACP called them on it. And, she's right.
You've described nothing that is 'manifest child abuse'.
You've described nothing that is 'manifest child abuse'.
If retarding normal development in children by misusing the FDA's guidelines for hormone supplements (which is what Stanford and other medical outfits are in fact doing and admit to doing in violation of FDA statutes) ....supplements that are known cancer causing agents...all to lead a child to amputate normal healthy organs, leaving them butchered halfings and never anything more as extremely young adults, sterile, incontinent etc. etc.... isn't manifest child abuse, then there is no definition of manifest or evident child abuse.
And again, no matter how many professionals sign off on child abuse (like many doctors did in WWII Nazi death camp experiments on children), there is no safety behind credentials and no safety in numbers. Child abuse is NEVER vogue.
