#BlackLivesMatter Leader Warns US Needs New Constitution or “There will be Bullets”

[9thIDdoc]

Remember that cattle rancher in Nevada refusing to pay federal grazing fees? His refusal was applauded by the right. Just like when Ruby Ridge went down, some on the right applauded the guy's resistance to federal law enforcement and bemoaned what invariably befell him.

Pleanty on the right exhibiting every bit the disloyalty as some on the left.

I consider the government at fault at Ruby Ridge, Waco, and in the Nevada cattle attempted theft incident. But most certainly do not consider myself part of any sovereign citizen group. At present I think we have a much bigger with the government breaking the law than with private citizens doing so.

 

[boedicca]

7360 by boedicca on US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

 

[9thIDdoc]

When Black people stop waiting for white america to care about the moral deficit inherent in this hypocritical country they will focus their attention on building and defending their own communities. I understand what they are trying to do but it wont happen waiting on whites. Never in the history of the world has anyone willing surrendered or probably ever shared power with a group they hate and fear.

You are obviously part of the problem rather being in any way part of a reasonable solution to racism. You can't end racism by being a racist. A person who feels that those of other races owe them something simply because of their race is a blatant racist. When Americans think of each other as "American" instead of black or white or green we can get on with more important things.

Never in the history of the world has anyone willing surrendered or probably ever shared power with a group they hate and fear.

Which makes it pretty stupid to deliberately become a group that is hated or feared.

 

[Asclepias]

When Black people stop waiting for white america to care about the moral deficit inherent in this hypocritical country they will focus their attention on building and defending their own communities. I understand what they are trying to do but it wont happen waiting on whites. Never in the history of the world has anyone willing surrendered or probably ever shared power with a group they hate and fear.

You are obviously part of the problem rather being in any way part of a reasonable solution to racism. You can't end racism by being a racist. A person who feels that those of other races owe them something simply because of their race is a blatant racist. When Americans think of each other as "American" instead of black or white or green we can get on with more important things.

Never in the history of the world has anyone willing surrendered or probably ever shared power with a group they hate and fear.

Which makes it pretty stupid to deliberately become a group that is hated or feared.

"A person who feels that those of other races owe them something simply because of their race is a blatant racist."

Obviously all dictionaries were burned in your household and internet traffic sourced from your computer to online dictionaries are blocked in your ISP as well.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

link?

DHS intelligence report warns of domestic right-wing terror threat

"A new Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment circulated this month focuses on the threat of right-wing sovereign citizen extremist groups in the U.S. Some law enforcement groups say the threat is equal to, and occasionally greater than, the threat from Islamic extremist groups.

The Homeland Security report, produced in coordination with the FBI, counts 24 violent sovereign citizen-related attacks across the U.S. since 2010, CNN reported Friday.

These types of extremists believe that they can ignore laws because those laws attack their individual rights, even in routine daily instances like a traffic stop or being required to obey a court order, CNN reported Friday."


The End Of Constitutional Government | John Hawkins' Right Wing News

Has some preventing me from highlighting and copying text, but read from "Persecution and tyranny are upon us..." Very seditious language.

And this supports your claim that shitkickers are calling for a new Constitution or there will be bullets? Oh and would be applauded for it.

Dude, that isn't even fucking remotely close!!

Remember that cattle rancher in Nevada refusing to pay federal grazing fees? His refusal was applauded by the right. Just like when Ruby Ridge went down, some on the right applauded the guy's resistance to federal law enforcement and bemoaned what invariably befell him.

Pleanty on the right exhibiting every bit the disloyalty as some on the left.

Did he demand a new Constitution?

Face it bub, you made up some bullshit that wasn't even close to being true. Just admit it and move on.

Soverign citizens, neo-Nazis, etc have already commited seditious acts, murdered law enforcement (neo-Nazi couple a while back who left Nazi flags on the officer they murdered,) OKC bombing, Ruby Ridge, etc. No shortage of right-wing terrorism actually perpetuated.

Versus an online threat. Reality vs bluster. Certainly there's left-wing terrorism as well, but there's right-wingers doing it too.

But have they demanded a new Constitution?

 

[Delta4Embassy]

DHS intelligence report warns of domestic right-wing terror threat

"A new Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment circulated this month focuses on the threat of right-wing sovereign citizen extremist groups in the U.S. Some law enforcement groups say the threat is equal to, and occasionally greater than, the threat from Islamic extremist groups.

The Homeland Security report, produced in coordination with the FBI, counts 24 violent sovereign citizen-related attacks across the U.S. since 2010, CNN reported Friday.

These types of extremists believe that they can ignore laws because those laws attack their individual rights, even in routine daily instances like a traffic stop or being required to obey a court order, CNN reported Friday."


The End Of Constitutional Government | John Hawkins' Right Wing News

Has some preventing me from highlighting and copying text, but read from "Persecution and tyranny are upon us..." Very seditious language.

And this supports your claim that shitkickers are calling for a new Constitution or there will be bullets? Oh and would be applauded for it.

Dude, that isn't even fucking remotely close!!

Remember that cattle rancher in Nevada refusing to pay federal grazing fees? His refusal was applauded by the right. Just like when Ruby Ridge went down, some on the right applauded the guy's resistance to federal law enforcement and bemoaned what invariably befell him.

Pleanty on the right exhibiting every bit the disloyalty as some on the left.

Did he demand a new Constitution?

Face it bub, you made up some bullshit that wasn't even close to being true. Just admit it and move on.

Soverign citizens, neo-Nazis, etc have already commited seditious acts, murdered law enforcement (neo-Nazi couple a while back who left Nazi flags on the officer they murdered,) OKC bombing, Ruby Ridge, etc. No shortage of right-wing terrorism actually perpetuated.

Versus an online threat. Reality vs bluster. Certainly there's left-wing terrorism as well, but there's right-wingers doing it too.

But have they demanded a new Constitution?

If talking about overthrowing the government one assumes a new Constitution is part of it.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Funny how when some shitkicker says the same thing people applaud, but when some black says it people go spare.

Name one shitkicker that said it. I don't care who said it, tough shit and bring it on.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

“A Constitution written by only white men will never serve the interests of Black people”

Yeah, it NEVARRR was used to correct its initial mistake and free black folks from slavery. Hundreds of thousands of people didn't die in the effort to make that happen. Fucking moron.

Who is the moron who said mistakes werent corrected?

Probably a retarded lib.

 

[Asclepias]

DHS intelligence report warns of domestic right-wing terror threat

"A new Department of Homeland Security intelligence assessment circulated this month focuses on the threat of right-wing sovereign citizen extremist groups in the U.S. Some law enforcement groups say the threat is equal to, and occasionally greater than, the threat from Islamic extremist groups.

The Homeland Security report, produced in coordination with the FBI, counts 24 violent sovereign citizen-related attacks across the U.S. since 2010, CNN reported Friday.

These types of extremists believe that they can ignore laws because those laws attack their individual rights, even in routine daily instances like a traffic stop or being required to obey a court order, CNN reported Friday."


The End Of Constitutional Government | John Hawkins' Right Wing News

Has some preventing me from highlighting and copying text, but read from "Persecution and tyranny are upon us..." Very seditious language.

And this supports your claim that shitkickers are calling for a new Constitution or there will be bullets? Oh and would be applauded for it.

Dude, that isn't even fucking remotely close!!

Remember that cattle rancher in Nevada refusing to pay federal grazing fees? His refusal was applauded by the right. Just like when Ruby Ridge went down, some on the right applauded the guy's resistance to federal law enforcement and bemoaned what invariably befell him.

Pleanty on the right exhibiting every bit the disloyalty as some on the left.

Did he demand a new Constitution?

Face it bub, you made up some bullshit that wasn't even close to being true. Just admit it and move on.

Soverign citizens, neo-Nazis, etc have already commited seditious acts, murdered law enforcement (neo-Nazi couple a while back who left Nazi flags on the officer they murdered,) OKC bombing, Ruby Ridge, etc. No shortage of right-wing terrorism actually perpetuated.

Versus an online threat. Reality vs bluster. Certainly there's left-wing terrorism as well, but there's right-wingers doing it too.

But have they demanded a new Constitution?

They are barking up the wrong tree. They can construct a brand new constitution as much as they want to. It wont change the psychosis inherent in white culture.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

I swore an oath to defend the Constitution, so if ya'll want to attack it with bullets or anything else, all I can say is "if you feel froggy, jump".

Yep

 

[Lonestar_logic]

And this supports your claim that shitkickers are calling for a new Constitution or there will be bullets? Oh and would be applauded for it.

Dude, that isn't even fucking remotely close!!

Remember that cattle rancher in Nevada refusing to pay federal grazing fees? His refusal was applauded by the right. Just like when Ruby Ridge went down, some on the right applauded the guy's resistance to federal law enforcement and bemoaned what invariably befell him.

Pleanty on the right exhibiting every bit the disloyalty as some on the left.

Did he demand a new Constitution?

Face it bub, you made up some bullshit that wasn't even close to being true. Just admit it and move on.

Soverign citizens, neo-Nazis, etc have already commited seditious acts, murdered law enforcement (neo-Nazi couple a while back who left Nazi flags on the officer they murdered,) OKC bombing, Ruby Ridge, etc. No shortage of right-wing terrorism actually perpetuated.

Versus an online threat. Reality vs bluster. Certainly there's left-wing terrorism as well, but there's right-wingers doing it too.

But have they demanded a new Constitution?

If talking about overthrowing the government one assumes a new Constitution is part of it.

You know what they say about "assume". But that's not what you claimed.

I don't understand why you just don't man up and admit you were wrong.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

And this supports your claim that shitkickers are calling for a new Constitution or there will be bullets? Oh and would be applauded for it.

Dude, that isn't even fucking remotely close!!

Remember that cattle rancher in Nevada refusing to pay federal grazing fees? His refusal was applauded by the right. Just like when Ruby Ridge went down, some on the right applauded the guy's resistance to federal law enforcement and bemoaned what invariably befell him.

Pleanty on the right exhibiting every bit the disloyalty as some on the left.

Did he demand a new Constitution?

Face it bub, you made up some bullshit that wasn't even close to being true. Just admit it and move on.

Soverign citizens, neo-Nazis, etc have already commited seditious acts, murdered law enforcement (neo-Nazi couple a while back who left Nazi flags on the officer they murdered,) OKC bombing, Ruby Ridge, etc. No shortage of right-wing terrorism actually perpetuated.

Versus an online threat. Reality vs bluster. Certainly there's left-wing terrorism as well, but there's right-wingers doing it too.

But have they demanded a new Constitution?

They are barking up the wrong tree. They can construct a brand new constitution as much as they want to. It wont change the psychosis inherent in white culture.

Or the thuggery in the black tribal culture.

 

[JFK_USA]

“A Constitution written by only white men will never serve the interests of Black people”

Yeah, it NEVARRR was used to correct its initial mistake and free black folks from slavery. Hundreds of thousands of people didn't die in the effort to make that happen. Fucking moron.

The founding fathers decided it was more important to protect the rights of property owners than to give black people rights. It is true that WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN, it did not serve the interests of black people.

It is insane to defend such people that would say such things. What exactly do they want to change about the constitution?

"You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. In fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years. I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying, 'My goodness, what can we do to turn this country around?' I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out." - Sharron Angle.

So here is your party saying the same thing, are you going to defend them like a hypocrite?

What part of the Constitution is not inclusive to blacks?

I think this clown hasn't ever read the Constitution. I doubt his IQ is above 70.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

That's pretty much stating you're not equal in the eyes of the law. I doubt YOU ever read the Constitution, it was not made in the interest of freeing black people. It was for them to protect their rights to property.

 

[AmericanFirst1]

Funny how when some shitkicker says the same thing people applaud, but when some black says it people go spare.

Bullshit. Every shitkicker I know is willing to fight to keep the Constitution as is. And shitkickers have waay more bullets and know how to use them.

The sovereign citizen movement is a loose grouping of American and Canadian litigants, commentators, tax protesters and financial-scheme promoters. Self-described sovereign citizens take the position that they are answerable only to their particular interpretation of the common law[1] and are not subject to any statutes or proceedings at the federal, state or municipal levels; that they do not recognize United States currency; and/or that they are "free of any legal constraints."[2][3][4] They especially reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate.[5] Participants in the movement argue this concept in opposition to "federal citizens," who, they say, have unknowingly forfeited their rights by accepting some aspect of federal law.[6] It is similar in doctrines to the freemen on the land movement, more commonly found in Britain and Canada.[7][8][9][10]

Many members of the sovereign citizen movement believe that the United States government is illegitimate.[11] JJ MacNab, who writes for Forbes about anti-government extremism, describes the sovereign citizen movement as consisting of individuals who believe that the County Sheriff is the most powerful law-enforcement officer in the country, with authority superior to that of any federal agent, elected official or local law-enforcement official.[12]

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) classifies some sovereign citizens ("sovereign citizen extremists") as domestic terrorists.[13] In 2010, the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) estimated that approximately 100,000 Americans were "hard-core sovereign believers," with another 200,000 "just starting out by testing sovereign techniques for resisting everything from speeding tickets to drug charges."
Sovereign citizen movement - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

FBI considers soverign citizen activists the most dire national security threat even ahead of Islamic terrorism.

They are retarded idiots.

 

[Asclepias]

“A Constitution written by only white men will never serve the interests of Black people”

Yeah, it NEVARRR was used to correct its initial mistake and free black folks from slavery. Hundreds of thousands of people didn't die in the effort to make that happen. Fucking moron.

Who is the moron who said mistakes werent corrected?

The who moron said the quote I quoted from the article...which should be pretty obvious to anyone who isn't a moron.

Yeah, but whos the person who said that no mistakes were corrected? The only person I see who said that is you and then you called no one a moron.....

I'm not even going to respond...your own words in these replies pretty much show that you ain't got the brains God gave an ape. Good job! Hey, maybe you can team up with the moron in the article...between the two of you there might be half a wit in there somewhere.

Ok, I just wondered why you said something the guy never did then called someone a moron for your words. In the entire article he never mentions what mistakes were made or solutions done in the past.

I think he is embarrassed he claimed someone said something that was never said and finally realized it.

 

[Asclepias]

Remember that cattle rancher in Nevada refusing to pay federal grazing fees? His refusal was applauded by the right. Just like when Ruby Ridge went down, some on the right applauded the guy's resistance to federal law enforcement and bemoaned what invariably befell him.

Pleanty on the right exhibiting every bit the disloyalty as some on the left.

Did he demand a new Constitution?

Face it bub, you made up some bullshit that wasn't even close to being true. Just admit it and move on.

Soverign citizens, neo-Nazis, etc have already commited seditious acts, murdered law enforcement (neo-Nazi couple a while back who left Nazi flags on the officer they murdered,) OKC bombing, Ruby Ridge, etc. No shortage of right-wing terrorism actually perpetuated.

Versus an online threat. Reality vs bluster. Certainly there's left-wing terrorism as well, but there's right-wingers doing it too.

But have they demanded a new Constitution?

They are barking up the wrong tree. They can construct a brand new constitution as much as they want to. It wont change the psychosis inherent in white culture.

Or the thuggery in the black tribal culture.

Or the white cave monkey culture...the original thugs.

 

[Asclepias]

“A Constitution written by only white men will never serve the interests of Black people”

Yeah, it NEVARRR was used to correct its initial mistake and free black folks from slavery. Hundreds of thousands of people didn't die in the effort to make that happen. Fucking moron.

The founding fathers decided it was more important to protect the rights of property owners than to give black people rights. It is true that WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN, it did not serve the interests of black people.

It is insane to defend such people that would say such things. What exactly do they want to change about the constitution?

"You know, our Founding Fathers, they put that Second Amendment in there for a good reason and that was for the people to protect themselves against a tyrannical government. In fact Thomas Jefferson said it's good for a country to have a revolution every 20 years. I hope that's not where we're going, but, you know, if this Congress keeps going the way it is, people are really looking toward those Second Amendment remedies and saying, 'My goodness, what can we do to turn this country around?' I'll tell you the first thing we need to do is take Harry Reid out." - Sharron Angle.

So here is your party saying the same thing, are you going to defend them like a hypocrite?

What part of the Constitution is not inclusive to blacks?

I think this clown hasn't ever read the Constitution. I doubt his IQ is above 70.

Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three fifths of all other Persons.

That's pretty much stating you're not equal in the eyes of the law. I doubt YOU ever read the Constitution, it was not made in the interest of freeing black people. It was for them to protect their rights to property.

But it was a good thing they werent full people. It took away southern voting power. I know they could have just done away with slavery but then how would the US have become an economic power?

 

[ClosedCaption]

“A Constitution written by only white men will never serve the interests of Black people”

Yeah, it NEVARRR was used to correct its initial mistake and free black folks from slavery. Hundreds of thousands of people didn't die in the effort to make that happen. Fucking moron.

Who is the moron who said mistakes werent corrected?

Probably a retarded lib.

No, only Dan

 

[Mac1958]

I wonder where the SPLC, Hillary, Obama, etc hasn't branded this GROUP a hate group that is more dangerous to us than terrorist like Hillary did recently about the NRA? When are on the left going to take a stand for ALL OF US in this country? this is getting OUT OF HAND

snip:
Black Lives Matter activist leader Black Simons penned a piece in September warning that the US needs a new Constitution or “there will be bullets.”


Blake Simons, a UC Berkeley student, argues that a Constitution written by white men will never serve the interests of Black People.

Simons warns that either a new Constitution is written or there will be violence and bloodshed.
The Social Memo reported, via Free Republic:

A “Black Lives Matter” leader has issued a dire warning for the United States: the United States needs a new Constitution or else, he warns, “it will be the bullet” for the US.

Blake Simons, who wrote an article detailing his ideas, is the Deputy Comms Director of “Afrikan Black Coalition.” The name of his piece is “A New Constitution or the Bullet.”

Simons writes, “Our Black Lives Matter protests have stormed the country, yet cops continue to kill us daily, and the judicial system continues to justify our deaths with acquittals, non-indictments, and light sentences-all in the name of upholding the Constitution.”

After months of protesting, Simons explains that he came “to realize that the Constitution is the root of virtually all our problems in America.”

He continues, “The U.S. is a country that was founded on slavery, genocide, rape, and white male patriarchy. The colonizers that we condemn for enslaving Afikans and murdering indigenous peoples are the same people that produced and upheld the document we use to govern our nation to this day. Our bloodshed is rooted in this nation’s founding document, The Constitution.”

For this reason, there “must be a new constitution or the bullet.”

“A Constitution written by only white men will never serve the interests of Black people,” Simons argues. “The Constitution was written for the ruling class of white men which constructed whiteness to be more valuable than any other race. When we discuss institutional racism, it is essential that we realize that the Constitution created it.”

Blake is a Louis Farrakhan supporter.

all of it here:
#BlackLivesMatter Leader Warns US Needs New Constitution or "There will be Bullets" - The Gateway Pundit

Well, whatever, I guess they'll have to start shooting.

Kids nowadays.
.

 

[jc456]

Funny how when some shitkicker says the same thing people applaud, but when some black says it people go spare.

Why do you use an offensive term to describe white people, but you call Black people "black people"? Is it cowardice, bias? Explain yourself.

I think the word you're looking for is hypocrite.