Black Genocide

1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger

What makes us think progressives want to support blacks? Welfare, affirmative action, rhetoric? We have already seen their reaction to receiving illegals-"not in my backyard". Remember the sixties and the invited token and obligatory second? You could be chic and awakened without a real commitment. My father was the flaming liberal-he valued the inner city black kids he taught more than his own family-and that's the problem in a nutshell. There should be NO differences of people in value, only in relationships. If you don't want blacks at your party don't invite them- don't invite a couple and say "see what I did". I prefer Archie Bunker over Nancy Pelosi-as least he means what he says.




"What makes us think progressives want to support blacks?"


Not I.


I always believed that the Liberals/Democrats/Progressives would do whatever advanced their power.

No prob throwing blacks under the bus.....


Obama's US Civil Rights Commission, 2010 Report:
"The United States Commission on Civil Rights (Commission) is pleased to transmit this report, The Impact of Illegal Immigration on the Wages and Employment Opportunities of Black Workers. A panel of experts briefed members of the Commission on April 4, 2008 regarding the evidence for economic loss and job opportunity costs to black workers attributable to illegal immigration. The panelists also described non-economic factors contributing to the depression of black wages and employment rates.

Illegal immigration to the United States in recent decades has tended to depress both wages and employment rates for low-skilled American citizens, a disproportionate number of whom are black men."
USCCR: Page Not Found

https://www.usccr.gov/pubs/docs/IllegImmig_10-14-10_430pm.pdf



But....illegals can be trained to vote for 'em, as Obama told them to.
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger


Excellent thread. In 2017 Planned Parenthood made a staggering 190 million dollars from performing abortions. Keeping that number in mind, who here among us could possibly still believe PP and the Democratic Party are championing recreational abortion as the enshrining of women's rights? No? Very obviously abortion on demand is an industry and nothing more, an industry of death. Of course, a great case could be made for PP also being a neo-Moloch cult wearing a rather thinly veiled disguise. Still, doesn't change a thing, the practice of modern day abortion is a very lucrative industry. Soylent Green? Not far off.

Abortion makes over half Planned Parenthood’s non-government income: analysis




Here is the supporter of infanticide lying for them:


. Obama…a supporter of infanticide…which is why he lies to support Planned Parenthood.

“....on abortion, Obama is an extremist. He has opposed the Supreme Court decision that finally upheld the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act against that form of infanticide. Most startlingly, for a professed humanist, Obama – in the Illinois Senate – also voted against the Born Alive Infant Protection Act.

I have reported on several of those cases when, before the abortion was completed, an alive infant was suddenly in the room. It was disposed of as a horrified nurse who was not necessarily pro-life followed the doctors’ orders to put the baby in a pail or otherwise get rid of the child.” Infanticide candidate for president




…who has stated that he didn’t want his daughters ‘punished’ with a baby…..told this lie:


You’ve got issues like Planned Parenthood, where that organization provides millions of women cervical-cancer screenings, mammograms, all kinds of basic health care.”— President Obama during an interview on “The Tonight Show,” Oct. 24, 2012

“The president has suggested time and again that Planned Parenthood directly provides mammograms, but the organization only offers referrals and helps women find financial resources for the exams. This suggests an intentional attempt to mislead voters…”
Obama’s ‘Tonight Show’ remark: Planned Parenthood provides mammograms



"....past-President Cecile Richards falsely claimed her organization provided mammograms. Even the Washington Postdebunked that claim. Ultimately, former Planned Parenthood President Cecile Richards was forced to admit under oath in a congressional hearing that the abortion giant doesn’t provide mammograms."
Planned Parenthood on the Defensive
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger

What makes us think progressives want to support blacks? Welfare, affirmative action, rhetoric? We have already seen their reaction to receiving illegals-"not in my backyard". Remember the sixties and the invited token and obligatory second? You could be chic and awakened without a real commitment. My father was the flaming liberal-he valued the inner city black kids he taught more than his own family-and that's the problem in a nutshell. There should be NO differences of people in value, only in relationships. If you don't want blacks at your party don't invite them- don't invite a couple and say "see what I did". I prefer Archie Bunker over Nancy Pelosi-as least he means what he says.

Thus is the nature of virtue signalling. It is nothing beyond a conditioned response where people reward each other if they say one thing and call them names if they say something else.

At least back in the 60s, there were actual liberals who could present an intelligent argument and who understood principles. As we have seen in this thread, most leftists today are profoundly undereducated, not really liberal and only know the very rigid talking points they are expected to parrot. In that, they are nothing but fundamentalists who have very strong beliefs without any reason. Have you noticed how often they cannot discuss an actual issue without tossing in a whole bucket load of unrelated talking points? That's because all they know is what they are supposed to say, but haven't the foggiest as to why they say it.

They might as well be thumping bibles while claiming the Earth is only 6000 years old and that dinosaur bones were put here by Satan to fool us all.
 
Abortion is voluntary and does not meet the criteria as forced death via genocide, now the Native American Indians tribes were when the Christians decided to steal their land. The Trail of Tears is a well documented event of brutality, inhumanity an part of the program of Christians committing real genocide. Yet your volumes of rhetorical propaganda never mentions the savage act. Hypocrite much?
I know of no developing child whom has volunteered to die. At this point prudence demands documentation to support your assertion...
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger

What makes us think progressives want to support blacks? Welfare, affirmative action, rhetoric? We have already seen their reaction to receiving illegals-"not in my backyard". Remember the sixties and the invited token and obligatory second? You could be chic and awakened without a real commitment. My father was the flaming liberal-he valued the inner city black kids he taught more than his own family-and that's the problem in a nutshell. There should be NO differences of people in value, only in relationships. If you don't want blacks at your party don't invite them- don't invite a couple and say "see what I did". I prefer Archie Bunker over Nancy Pelosi-as least he means what he says.

Thus is the nature of virtue signalling. It is nothing beyond a conditioned response where people reward each other if they say one thing and call them names if they say something else.

At least back in the 60s, there were actual liberals who could present an intelligent argument and who understood principles. As we have seen in this thread, most leftists today are profoundly undereducated, not really liberal and only know the very rigid talking points they are expected to parrot. In that, they are nothing but fundamentalists who have very strong beliefs without any reason. Have you noticed how often they cannot discuss an actual issue without tossing in a whole bucket load of unrelated talking points? That's because all they know is what they are supposed to say, but haven't the foggiest as to why they say it.

They might as well be thumping bibles while claiming the Earth is only 6000 years old and that dinosaur bones were put here by Satan to fool us all.


Lack of education brings with it compelling dangers such as the misunderstanding that religion can be an organized cult which does not require the revelation or naming of a clearly defined traditional or even visibly presented "god". The political ideology of contemporary abortion on demand is just such a religion, one cloaked ingeniously in the sackcloth of grass roots civil rights movements and political party talking points and forged social science statistics. Further, one cannot believe in the benevolence and necessity of infanticide without adherence to a well structured, organized belief system with hierarchies no different than the world's major religions. The uneducated fail to realize that someone had to put the idea into someone else's head that killing the born and unborn as a matter of social convenience was a good idea in order for that same belief to be disseminated into their own brains. Those blind to or ignorant of history, epistemology and philosophy post the Enlightenment in particular, seem to have no idea nor even care for that matter, who that someone was. Instead, they blindly and without much concern practice their religion of abortion unrealizing a neo-god does indeed gain worship in some form from their idiotic and unknowing efforts and fervor.
 
Abortion is voluntary and does not meet the criteria as forced death via genocide, now the Native American Indians tribes were when the Christians decided to steal their land. The Trail of Tears is a well documented event of brutality, inhumanity an part of the program of Christians committing real genocide. Yet your volumes of rhetorical propaganda never mentions the savage act. Hypocrite much?
I know of no developing child whom has volunteered to die. At this point prudence demands documentation to support your assertion...
I can remember being a junior in high school back in 1970 when the class was discussing abortion and I brought up the notion that one tenet of liberalism was fighting for those in a position too weak to have a voice.

I was met with blank stares. Those on the left could only see it in terms of women and those on the right were all using religious based arguments.

I think I had already decided by then that I wouldn't be joining any group that would have me for a member.
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger


"To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America."


if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America.....

additionally...if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger


"To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America."


if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America.....

additionally...if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless




"...if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America....."


Watch how simple it is to skewer you, mud.


1. Which of the Ten Commandments are you disagreeing with (sorry to end a sentence with a preposition)?

2. Even before the Bible, sentient individuals....clearly not you....understood right versus wrong:

Before Sinai and the Ten Commandments, there were the rules called the Noahide Laws, based on reason and a desire to be able to live with other people, laws against bad behavior, the idea that these injured society: bans on murder, theft, idolatry, sexual immorality, animal cruelty, cursing God, and the need to set up courts to punish the infractions. They are incumbent on everyone, whether one respects the Bible or not, because they are so obvious.
The benefit of the Bible is that it tells society how to be good.

“Noahide Laws, also called Noachian Laws, a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently binding on all mankind.” Noahide Laws | Judaism


“According to Jewish tradition, non-Jews who adhere to these laws …are said to be followers of Noahidism and regarded as righteous gentiles, who are assured of a place in …the world to come, the final reward of the righteous.” Seven Laws of Noah - Wikipedia


3. Some of us get our knowledge from the NYTimes, you.....some subscribe to the ideas above.....moi.




4. Let's remind all of where you are coming from....

"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physical sins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



5. Just imagine how much finer a human being you would be if you ever had the intellect or courage to question what they programmed into you in government school.
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger


"To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America."


if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America.....

additionally...if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless




1. "....if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless..."

Link or lie?


2. Let's remind about the party you support, and what it actually stands for:

The Democrat Party is now running on full-blown anti-white racism, socialism, infanticide, opposition to free speech, substituting illegal alien voters for the American citizenry, and anti-Semitism… the knuckle-dragging, atavistic pagan party.




This is why it is essential for you to keep posting: you lies are so east to reveal, and the opportunity to provide truth so obvious.


Readers can decide whether you are more a liar, or just stupid.
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger



A young lady is about to go into a clinic.....

you stop her....you explain to her why abortion is wrong....

she changes her mind!

has the child......but needs welfare....

which YOU refuse to give her....

so she and her child live in a cardboard box.....

she dies.....

the child lives!

and grows up to be a gay, liberal, atheist.......

who is beaten to death by people who read YOUR comments!


I don't like YOUR morals very much......
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger


"To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America."


if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America.....

additionally...if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless

Those who lie about the position of an entire political party based upon only the most extreme opinion they can find among one of its members is definitely not an asset to this country.
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger



A young lady is about to go into a clinic.....

you stop her....you explain to her why abortion is wrong....

she changes her mind!

has the child......but needs welfare....

which YOU refuse to give her....

so she and her child live in a cardboard box.....

she dies.....

the child lives!

and grows up to be a gay, liberal, atheist.......

who is beaten to death by people who read YOUR comments!


I don't like YOUR morals very much......

That posting sure does put a big load of bat shit in with the crazy.
 
Last edited:
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger



A young lady is about to go into a clinic.....

you stop her....you explain to her why abortion is wrong....

she changes her mind!

has the child......but needs welfare....

which YOU refuse to give her....

so she and her child live in a cardboard box.....

she dies.....

the child lives!

and grows up to be a gay, liberal, atheist.......

who is beaten to death by people who read YOUR comments!


I don't like YOUR morals very much......




Seems you were unable to handle this

1. Which of the Ten Commandments are you disagreeing with (sorry to end a sentence with a preposition)?



....or this....


1. "....if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless..."

Link or lie?




But I don't mind leaving you speechless.
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger


"To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America."


if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America.....

additionally...if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless




"...if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America....."


Watch how simple it is to skewer you, mud.


1. Which of the Ten Commandments are you disagreeing with (sorry to end a sentence with a preposition)?

2. Even before the Bible, sentient individuals....clearly not you....understood right versus wrong:

Before Sinai and the Ten Commandments, there were the rules called the Noahide Laws, based on reason and a desire to be able to live with other people, laws against bad behavior, the idea that these injured society: bans on murder, theft, idolatry, sexual immorality, animal cruelty, cursing God, and the need to set up courts to punish the infractions. They are incumbent on everyone, whether one respects the Bible or not, because they are so obvious.
The benefit of the Bible is that it tells society how to be good.

“Noahide Laws, also called Noachian Laws, a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently binding on all mankind.” Noahide Laws | Judaism


“According to Jewish tradition, non-Jews who adhere to these laws …are said to be followers of Noahidism and regarded as righteous gentiles, who are assured of a place in …the world to come, the final reward of the righteous.” Seven Laws of Noah - Wikipedia


3. Some of us get our knowledge from the NYTimes, you.....some subscribe to the ideas above.....moi.




4. Let's remind all of where you are coming from....

"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physical sins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



5. Just imagine how much finer a human being you would be if you ever had the intellect or courage to question what they programmed into you in government school.

Churchill will forgive your grammar-he knows you didn't mean TO. As far as Bible no Bible-religion has saved more people than we shall ever know, and killed more people than we will ever know. To me, life ends up being a zero sum game.
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger



A young lady is about to go into a clinic.....

you stop her....you explain to her why abortion is wrong....

she changes her mind!

has the child......but needs welfare....

which YOU refuse to give her....

so she and her child live in a cardboard box.....

she dies.....

the child lives!

and grows up to be a gay, liberal, atheist.......

who is beaten to death by people who read YOUR comments!


I don't like YOUR morals very much......




Seems you were unable to handle this

1. Which of the Ten Commandments are you disagreeing with (sorry to end a sentence with a preposition)?



....or this....


1. "....if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless..."

Link or lie?




But I don't mind leaving you speechless.

God's Law-Herem or cherem (Hebrew: חרם, ḥērem), as used in the Tanakh, means ‘devote’ or ‘destroy’.[2] It is also referred to as the ban. The term has been explained in different ways by scholars. It has been defined as "a mode of secluding, and rendering harmless, anything imperilling the religious life of the nation,"[3] or "the total destruction of the enemy and his goods at the conclusion of a campaign,"[4] or "uncompromising consecration of property and dedication of the property to God without possibility of recall or redemption."[2] J. A. Thompson suggests that herem meant that in the hour of victory all that would normally be regarded as booty, including the inhabitants of the land, was to be devoted to God. Thus would every harmful thing be burned out and the land purified.[5]
Herem (war or property) - Wikipedia

Is this the law of your God of Moses and the Ten Commandments, why yes it is advocating genocide and annihilation...
 
1. Every citizen of this nation has the very same right to make moral judgments as do the Justices of the Supreme Court. They have no special acumen in that area.
Judges are no more equipped to make said call than any sentient individual. Nazi Germany had judges, too.

To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America.


Here is the bottom line vis-à-vis the Supreme Court and abortion: do no expect any overturning of Roe. “…Tuesday's ruling artfully dodged the question of abortion,…”
Just as disappointing as Justice Robert’s support of Obamacare, explaining that it is not his duty to repair mistakes that the electorate makes, this court will leave it up to the electorate to put in power those who reflect its values. Politics.....nothing related to morality or even to justice.





2. "SCOTUS side-steps showdown over abortion

by Michael Cook | 2 Jun 2019 |



FB-Supreme-Court-Building-317435_(1)_500_333_c1_c_c.jpg


This week the US Supreme Court touched the third rail – abortion – and lived. In a relatively modest decision, Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky, the Court voted 7-2 ....It refused to review another section in the same law which prohibits abortion on the basis of the sex, race or disability of a foetus. "
BioEdge: the latest news and articles about bioethics





3. "... the Supreme Court's decision in Box v. Planned Parenthood of Indiana and Kentucky. Justice Clarence Thomas, the only African-American on the bench, was seething with anger when he reflected on the fate of black babies (see our story below):

...abortion in the United States is also marked by a considerable racial disparity. The reported nationwide abortion ratio— the number of abortions per 1,000 live births—among black women is nearly 3.5 times the ratio for white women. And there are areas of New York City in which black children are more likely to be aborted than they are to be born alive—and are up to eight times more likely to be aborted than white children in the same area.

Journalists who bothered to report his remarks shook their heads and described him as loopy. He's not. That abortion has a disproportionate impact on the poor and disenfranchised is a blot on American society."
BioEdge.











4."In 1921, Margaret Sanger founded the American Birth Control League, which in 1942 underwent a name change to become Planned Parenthood Federation of America.

Many of the group’s founding directors were actively involved in the “eugenics” movement, which held that certain classes or colors of people were “lesser” and “unfit” for humanity and shockingly should be eliminated. Included in these targeted “unfit” groups were black Americans (another group included was people with disabilities).

In addition to eugenics involvement, one founding director, Dr. Lothrup Stoddard, wrote a book, “Rising Tide of Color against White Supremacy.”

Perhaps the hardest fact to take in is that under Margaret Sanger’s leadership, the organization created a program called the “Negro Project,” which involved strategically seeking to decrease the black population by convincing black community leaders to introduce birth control to their networks.

About the project, Margaret Sanger was once quoted as saying, “We do not want the word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population, and the minister is the man who can straighten that idea out if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

She also spoke at Ku Klux Klan meetings."
The Racist Views of Planned Parenthood’s Founder





5. "These African-American pastors know that. Indeed, they show that 70 percent of Planned Parenthood abortion clinics are located in minority neighborhoods. Thus, they’re undertaking their own expose. Their letter, they say, will be but one “in a series of actions we will be taking to expose the evil of honoring Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood.”

Again, amen to that.

If liberals genuinely care about justice, they should join these African-American pastors in seeking the removal Margaret Sanger’s bust from the “Struggle for Justice” exhibit at America’s preeminent museum.

This woman is not worthy of enshrinement."
Progressives Are Wrong to Revere Margaret Sanger


"To be more clear, if you are asked ‘why’ you have a particular moral opinion, e.g., on abortion, and you have no answer outside of your party declared so, then you are not that cognizant individual and not an asset to America."


if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America.....

additionally...if you SUPPORT a PARTY (the GOP) with people who believe in criminalizing and probably executing gays (Roy Moore) then your opinion on abortion is worthless




"...if your moral opinion on abortion is based on a book written 2000 years ago by ignorant camel jockies who never bathed then you are NOT a cognizant individual and NOT an asset to America....."


Watch how simple it is to skewer you, mud.


1. Which of the Ten Commandments are you disagreeing with (sorry to end a sentence with a preposition)?

2. Even before the Bible, sentient individuals....clearly not you....understood right versus wrong:

Before Sinai and the Ten Commandments, there were the rules called the Noahide Laws, based on reason and a desire to be able to live with other people, laws against bad behavior, the idea that these injured society: bans on murder, theft, idolatry, sexual immorality, animal cruelty, cursing God, and the need to set up courts to punish the infractions. They are incumbent on everyone, whether one respects the Bible or not, because they are so obvious.
The benefit of the Bible is that it tells society how to be good.

“Noahide Laws, also called Noachian Laws, a Jewish Talmudic designation for seven biblical laws given to Adam and to Noah before the revelation to Moses on Mt. Sinai and consequently binding on all mankind.” Noahide Laws | Judaism


“According to Jewish tradition, non-Jews who adhere to these laws …are said to be followers of Noahidism and regarded as righteous gentiles, who are assured of a place in …the world to come, the final reward of the righteous.” Seven Laws of Noah - Wikipedia


3. Some of us get our knowledge from the NYTimes, you.....some subscribe to the ideas above.....moi.




4. Let's remind all of where you are coming from....

"Just because any religious idea, any idea of any god at all, any flirtation even with a god, is the most inexpressible foulness, particularly tolerantly (and often even favourably) accepted by the democratic bourgeoisie—for that very reason it is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful “infection.” A million physical sins, dirty tricks, acts of violence and infections are much more easily discovered by the crowd, and therefore are much less dangerous, than the nubile, spiritual idea of god, dressed up in the most attractive “ideological” costumes." Letter from Lenin to Maxim Gorky, Written on November 13 or 14, 1913 Lenin 55. TO MAXIM GORKY



5. Just imagine how much finer a human being you would be if you ever had the intellect or courage to question what they programmed into you in government school.

Churchill will forgive your grammar-he knows you didn't mean TO. As far as Bible no Bible-religion has saved more people than we shall ever know, and killed more people than we will ever know. To me, life ends up being a zero sum game.




1. I love Churchill's quote about the preposition.

2. Actually, the numbers have been revealed, deaths due to religion vs deaths due to secularism/Leftism....


"Some people blame organized religion for most of history's killings. It is also sometimes claimed that more people have been killed in the name of Christ than for any other reason.

The total number of deaths estimated to lie at the feet of humanity's poor practice of Christianity is approximately 17 million. This number would include ancient wars, the Crusades, the Inquisitions, various European wars during the Middle Ages, and witchcraft trials."
Isn't religion to blame for most of history's killings?




"Over the past 100 years the most oppressive ideology in the world has been communism [Marxism]. While the people who lived under it were starved, tortured and murdered, its leaders lived in luxury.
The suppression of ordinary people by their communist rulers far surpasses anything capitalist employers were ever accused of doing. While condemning exploitation, communist dictators turned out to be masters at it.

R.J. Rummel estimates that almost 170 million people were killed in the 20th century by their own governments. These are not deaths in war. They are the victims of genocide by the governments in the countries where they lived. Hate on the Left
 
This asian b---- needs to shut her mouth about black people. All these conservatives are now experts on black people like they give a fuck. White supremacy via the police killings as well as policies enacted by racists are contributors to black genocide. Overblown numbers exaggerated by racists pertaining to a woman's choice is not.

There have been over 60 million abortions in the US since 1973. The numbers show that by percentage of the number of abortions, whites commit the most. This means whites numerically are having more abortions. But in usual fashion when whites lead a negative stat we will see the 12 percent excuse.
 
Last edited:
This asian b---- needs to shut her mouth about black people. All these conservatives are now experts on black people like they give a fuck. White supremacy via the police killings as well as policies enacted by racists are contributors to black genocide. Overblown numbers exaggerated by racists pertaining to a woman's choice is not.

There have been over 60 million abortions in the US since 1973. The numbers show that by percentage of the number of abortions, whites commit the most. This means whites numerically are having more abortions. But in usual fashion when whites lead a negative stat we will see the 12 percent excuse.


Wow. Talk about a Capo. Your like those Jews in concentration camps who sold out their own for little trinkets and a bag of gold teeth.
 
This asian b---- needs to shut her mouth about black people. All these conservatives are now experts on black people like they give a fuck. White supremacy via the police killings as well as policies enacted by racists are contributors to black genocide. Overblown numbers exaggerated by racists pertaining to a woman's choice is not.

There have been over 60 million abortions in the US since 1973. The numbers show that by percentage of the number of abortions, whites commit the most. This means whites numerically are having more abortions. But in usual fashion when whites lead a negative stat we will see the 12 percent excuse.


Wow. Talk about a Capo. Your like those Jews in concentration camps who sold out their own for little trinkets and a bag of gold teeth.

Nah. That would be you. Whites like you are so busy pointing fingers at everybody else that you ignore the larger problems you have.
 
This asian b---- needs to shut her mouth about black people. All these conservatives are now experts on black people like they give a fuck. White supremacy via the police killings as well as policies enacted by racists are contributors to black genocide. Overblown numbers exaggerated by racists pertaining to a woman's choice is not.

There have been over 60 million abortions in the US since 1973. The numbers show that by percentage of the number of abortions, whites commit the most. This means whites numerically are having more abortions. But in usual fashion when whites lead a negative stat we will see the 12 percent excuse.



You should learn how to speak to your betters.

I'll have to teach you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top