Bill de Blasio Reveals That He Wants To Steal From You Using Socialism

[mudwhistle]

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

"There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people."

Here's how we recognize 'owning the people'.....


Not capitalists......Democrats

a. There was the godfather of the Democrat Party, Franklin Delano Roosevelt:
The huge tax burden necessary to provide the ‘rights’ and fund federal welfare programs can be laid at the feet of the New Deal. Before 1940, only 5% of Americans paid any income tax, and the maximum was 25%. By the end of WWII, 2/3 of American families paid income tax- and it started at 24%, with a $500 exemption.

It went up to 94% over $200k. So, if one earned $300k, one kept only $6000 of the last $100k.
Withholding was re-introduced so the government got the money immediately. (Had been repealed in 1916.)



b.The attitude of the FDR government, and Democrats in general, can be seen in these words of A.B. “Happy” Chandler, a former Kentucky governor: “[A]ll of us owe the government; we owe it for everything we have—and that is the basis of obligation—and the government can take everything we have if the government needs it. . . . The government can assert its right to have all the taxes it needs for any purpose, either now or at any time in the future.”
From a speech delivered on the Senate floor
May 14, 1943 Happy Chandler’s dangerous statism


There's no daylight between the Democrat view, and Hitler’s philosopher Hegel who said, “The state says … you must obey …. The state has rights against the individual; its members have obligations, among them that of obeying without protest”



c. "Dan Rostenkowski, standing next to the candidate in front of the cameras and the cheering crowd at the convention after the fateful speech, whispered to Mondale, "You've got a lot of balls, pal." According to Rostenkowski, Mondale whispered back, "Look at 'em, we're going to tax their ass off."
Mondale says: "We're going to tax their ass off"


d.And, Hussein..... "But he did identify what he called “tactical lessons.” He let himself look too much like “the same old tax-and-spend liberal Democrat.”
The Education of President Obama


Obama’s father was for 100% taxation…think about that.

And, when you take all of their money....citizens become slaves.
The term 'slave' has always been associated with the Democrat Party, hasn't it.

The term 'slave' has always been associated with the Democrat Party, hasn't it

Damn that Democrat Washington! and especially King George...

I don't remember Washington or King George fighting against Abolition.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Because when you have something I want and I have something you want and we trade then both have gotten something we want.

It also benefits because it has reduced himan poverty more than any other idea.

 

[mudwhistle]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

This is every Democrat going back to FDR

The difference is this is an example when they aren't denying it.
Remember when Obama tried to destroy Joe The Plumber for even bringing it up???

 

[BWK]

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

Wrong.

Both sides benefit under capitalism

The fact that no one owns others destroys your premise and proves you wrong.

Those transactions are voluntary regardless of whether it is what one needs or what one wants.

Explain how both sides benefit again; the vulture chart - Google Search

Because when you have something I want and I have something you want and we trade then both have gotten something we want.

It also benefits because it has reduced himan poverty more than any other idea.

Thanks! That made absolutely no sense at all considering the fact that wages have been flat for almost fifty years. There is no benefit to a flat wage, and it certainly isn't Capitalism. And anyone who thinks it is a total idiot who understands nothing about math.

 

[danielpalos]

Solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner will mean gains from efficiency and the law of large numbers.

What?

Sounds like University of Mars economics s0n. Dude....go back to People.com . In here, nobody has a clue what you are talking about.

means tested social services are expensive as is the friction of poverty upon our economy.

 

[mudwhistle]

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

The major difference being you get something in return and you're not forced to do it at the end of a gun.

Amazing how they conflate voluntary transactions in which both sides benefit, with the coercion by the Bolsheviks.

Either they are as dumb as asphalt, or simply low-life lying Liberals.

There is no "both sides benefit" in capitalism. The only ones who benefit are the owners of the people. The transactions occur because people need food or gasoline or whatever. The owners of people do not need anything but suckers like republicans.

And your "solution" is universal poverty except for the super wealthy elite. Funny how every socialist regime ends up with a mass of ultra poor and starving people, and a small super wealthy ruling elite who murder all who are uppity.

Under socialism, Venezuelans love to go to the zoo.....for lunch.

"Venezuela's Starving People Are Now Eating The Zoo Animals - The Parisians Had The German Excuse"
Venezuela's Starving People Are Now Eating The Zoo Animals - The Parisians Had The German Excuse

 

[danielpalos]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

 

[hadit]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

You're still saying the same things and you're still wrong.

 

[hadit]

Solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner will mean gains from efficiency and the law of large numbers.

What law is that? Can you quote it or cite it? Then do you have any idea how it applies?

 

[hadit]

Solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner will mean gains from efficiency and the law of large numbers.

What?

Sounds like University of Mars economics s0n. Dude....go back to People.com . In here, nobody has a clue what you are talking about.

I don't think he does either.

 

[hadit]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

They're under some delusion taxing the rich will cover it.

 

[Rustic]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalist want yer money also, so do crooks of which their is not much difference between a socialist or a capitalist when it comes to taking away yer dough

Capitalist earn their money… Socialists do not

 

[danielpalos]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

You're still saying the same things and you're still wrong.

i gainsay your contention. you need a valid argument.

 

[danielpalos]

Solving for simple poverty in a market friendly manner will mean gains from efficiency and the law of large numbers.

What law is that? Can you quote it or cite it? Then do you have any idea how it applies?

the law is employment at will; not right wing appeals to ignorance.

 

[danielpalos]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

What you understand about economics would fit in a thimble. You're embarrassing yourself

 

[mudwhistle]

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

What you understand about economics would fit in a thimble. You're embarrassing yourself

You might want to explain to him what a thimble is.

 

[Soupnazi630]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

That's great except I am not a republican and my post still stands as fact

Unemployment compensation is not market friendly as it takes from those actually trying to buy and sell in the market

Redistribution by force is never market friendly under any circumstances and never has been

We have solved poverty through capitalism

 

[Soupnazi630]

The blinders are off:

New York City Mayor Bill de Blasio slammed the current economic model in New York City and the world-at-large during a recent speech; bizarrely claiming there’s “plenty of money,” it’s just not properly distributed. The Big Apple Democrat was speaking at his State of the City address when he made the stunning admission; vowing to redistribute the wealth throughout the nation’s largest metropolis.

"There’s plenty of money in the world. Plenty of money in this city," Mayor de Blasio said. "It’s just in the wrong hands!"
​

Yup........like most socialists....they want your money. They feel they have the right to just take it whenever they can manufacture a reason....or manufacture a crisis that warrants taking more.​

Capitalism has a natural rate of unemployment that socialism can solve for in a market friendly manner. The infrastructure already exists in our Republic.

Raising the minimum wage could solve the cost of living issue.

Wrong

Socialism has universally been a massive failure and the idea of a natural unemployment rate is delusional crap

Are there always unemployed people in every society? Yes! But it is not natural it is the result of volitional choice.

There is no living wage issue. Any wage is a living wage depending on how one chooses to live

nobody takes the right wing seriously about economics; propaganda and rhetoric is all they know.

Being able to apply for unemployment compensation for simply being unemployed is as market friendly as it gets. We could have solved simple poverty Yesterday; but, the Poor may benefit.

And there's your favorite fallacy on display. You still haven't shown where you're going to get the additional trillions you'll need every year.

people with recourse to an income can pay taxes. the costs can be recovered.

Not in the trillions and now you are only impoverishing people who have jobs