jc456
Diamond Member
- Dec 18, 2013
- 141,601
- 30,070
- 2,180
nopeOil funds were used for profit and well documented
Govt funds are used for science and only an accusation you cannot prove.
See the difference?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
nopeOil funds were used for profit and well documented
Govt funds are used for science and only an accusation you cannot prove.
See the difference?
nor mineThats not my problem
Oil funds were used for profit and well documented
Govt funds are used for science and only an accusation you cannot prove.
See the difference?
so if all arctic sea ice melted, how much rise of the sea would occur ?Thanks for so clearly demonstrating the stupidity and insanity of you denier cult dingbats.Typical AGW Faith Based Ministries "arguments" that humans are responsible for climate "change:"
The ice caps are melting and polar bears are going to DROOOOOOOOOWN. THEREFORE, we need to cease production of all things that release co2 into the Earth's atmosphere.
Yep. The suppressed premise there is that the history of human industry has released co2 into the atmosphere and this is THE cause of alleged global warming -- errr-- climate change.
To question their ASSumption is to blaspheme!
"Consensus," they will tell you.
But, climate "changed" many times from ice ages and back and forth and back again and again BEFORE humans released co2 into the Earth's atmosphere! In fact, climate is never static and is always changing.
Ah. But now it's different they will insist. Because? Because the rate of climate "change" is accelerating!
Maybe. Maybe not. But if you question their assertions, you are a "BLASPHEMER!" !! They use the term "Denier." Same thing.
And they point to "PROOF!" If it is hotter this year than prior years, they announce their preconceived verdict: "AGW!"
But if it happens to get colder, they point to their theory that there is this "paradoxical effect" FROM AGW "caused by" mankind's release of co2 into the Earth's atmosphere.
If you object and say, "Wait. If it gets hotter you proclaim AGW. But if it gets colder, you proclaim AGW. Your 'theory' is non-falsifiable. That's not particularly 'scientific.'"
Their rejoinder is: "DENIER!!!!"
They will get the Attorney General of the Virgin Islands to issue a subpoena for each and every record ever made or received in snail mail, email article or post and every document ever printed and every phone call or text ever sent and demand that it be rendered in pdf searchable format by Exxon-Mobile and all those who ever discussed the "science" of climate change with that company!
Fear not. It's not a witch hunt. (But did they happen to mention that you are a blasphemer?)
I call advocacy for AGW phony, you dimwit dishonest hack.
So I'm dishonest? Well then tell me this, if advocacy for AGW phony then what do you call scientist who advocate AGW?
Since I'm dishonest I'm sure you don't call them phonies, right?
You are dishonest. And an imbecile.
And anybody who makes the nonsensical and unscientific 'arguments" offered by the AGW Faith Based crowd are also being either ignorant or dishonest.
As for the so-called "scientists" who insist that AGW is based on good science, they can be real scientists making absurd, stupid, ignorant or dishonest claims. None of that helps you. You are still a jerk off.
Are you saying you called me dishonest for stating what you said above?
I said you call scientists phonies.
You said I was lying.
And to prove it you explained why you call scientists phonies. I proved my point here.
I have not called scientists phonies although clearly some are.
You are a liar. AND you are a moron.
What a combo!
Awesome! You confirm what you called a lie then yiu think if you scream liar enough it changes anything lol.
That's for proving me dishonest by agreeing!