Bernie Sanders has my vote. He must win.

[Disir]

Yawn.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

Or theres always community organizing and da revolucion !

Proletariat arise !!!!!!

 

[Disir]

And this is your way of ignoring what actually happened because you're right up there with Obama.
Brothers from another mother.

 

[LogikAndReazon]

You wouldve loved barack husseins mother.... An anti American , communist p.o.s.
In a third world type of way ....lol

 

[Little-Acorn]

Sen. Bernie Sanders Says U.S. Should Look More Like Scandinavia

I have the perfect solution which will make everyone happy:
Bernie and his supporters should move to Scandinavia.

Problem solved!

 

[Little-Acorn]

You left out the Constitution, to nobody's surprise. It says there are only certain things the Fed govt can spend tax money on. Most of Bernie's programs aren't included. But he says he'll do it anyway. That turns his actions into theft, and distribution of stolen goods.
Socialists, of course, believe that government can, and should, do anything.
They are wrong on both counts.
That's why people like Sanders will get fewer votes than the local dogcatcher.

You have no idea what Sanders is about.

Socialism. aka "Theft and distribution of stolen goods", as I pointed out.

The rest pales in importance.

I would no sooner vote to put Sanders in government, than I would vote to put Al Capone in charge of guarding the vault of my local bank. And for the same reasons.

Who cares if he was going to use the money he misappropriated, to help retirees or whomever?

 

[Disir]

You left out the Constitution, to nobody's surprise. It says there are only certain things the Fed govt can spend tax money on. Most of Bernie's programs aren't included. But he says he'll do it anyway. That turns his actions into theft, and distribution of stolen goods.
Socialists, of course, believe that government can, and should, do anything.
They are wrong on both counts.
That's why people like Sanders will get fewer votes than the local dogcatcher.

You have no idea what Sanders is about.

Socialism. aka "Theft and distribution of stolen goods", as I pointed out.

The rest pales in importance.

I would no sooner vote to put Sanders in government, than I would vote to put Al Capone in charge of guarding the vault of my local bank. And for the same reasons.

Who cares if he was going to use the money he misappropriated, to help retirees or whomever?

Again. You know nothing about his policies or what he stands for. So, you can drone on and on about socialism etc. This time, it won't work. You blew it the last time. You wasted all of that drivel on the wrong guy. A guy that is closely aligned with what you believe, I might add.

 

[georgephillip]

In that rinky dink little state Sanders is from he got half a million form the filthy unions and $2.6 million from "large contributors" (i.e millionaires) so the guy is a hypocrite.

Large contributors are those who gave $200 or more per election cycle, NOT millionaires. How many times do you need to be reminded of that fact?
Sen. Bernie Sanders Campaign Finance Money - Summary - Senator 2014 OpenSecrets

 

[Flash]

[


Auto bailouts seemed to have worked.

They certainly saved the greedy bloated union pension but it was at a cost of billions of taxpayer's dollars and the loss of the money to the bondholders.

No welfare, bailouts subsidies or entitlements. The only sane course of action for the government.

 

[Flash]

In that rinky dink little state Sanders is from he got half a million form the filthy unions and $2.6 million from "large contributors" (i.e millionaires) so the guy is a hypocrite.

Large contributors are those who gave $200 or more per election cycle, NOT millionaires. How many times do you need to be reminded of that fact?
Sen. Bernie Sanders Campaign Finance Money - Summary - Senator 2014 OpenSecrets

I get reminded that Sanders took money from unions, PACs and "large contributors" every time I look at this spreadsheet:

Sen. Bernie Sanders Campaign Finance Money - Summary - Senator 2014 OpenSecrets

Piss on him. He is a hypocrite that wants to continue to take money for PACs and large contributors but doesn't want PACs and large contributors giving money to conservative organizations he doesn't like.

The reason why the shithead is on this AGW scam bandwagon is because he wants some of Tom Steyer's millions.

 

[georgephillip]

I get reminded that Sanders took money from unions, PACs and "large contributors" every time I look at this spreadsheet

You mean this one?
"NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for 2009-2014 and based on Federal Election Commission data available electronically on April 06, 2015 (for Fundraising totals, Source of Funds and Total Raised vs Average) and on March 09, 2015 for Top Contributors and Industries. In the 'Source of Funds' chart, 'Large Individual Contributions' refer to all contributions from unique individuals aggregating to more than $200 within a cycle, and 'Small Individual Contributions' refer to all contributions from unique individuals totaling $200 or less within a cycle."
How many "millionaires" have donated to Bernie?
Sen. Bernie Sanders Campaign Finance Money - Summary - Senator 2014 OpenSecrets

 

[jasonnfree]

So now we are beginning to get some kind of form to Bernie Sanders' platform, thanks to Disir.

A summary of what we have up to this point:

A pathway to citizenship for 11 million undocumented immigrants.

Break up Too Big To Fail banks.

Free higher education.

Seizure of wealth from upper 1 percent through special taxes.

End a "variety of loopholes and deductions" in the tax code which benefit the wealthy.

Lift the cap on the payroll tax.

Increase COLA for Social Security.

A "significant" increase in funding to rebuild crumbling bridges, roads, airports and water systems.

Raise the federal minimum wage.

Free daycare.

Free mass transit.

Free everything and thievery by the government.

Only an idiot would think that would work.

Yeah, gotta love lefties' repetitive use of the term "free".

Free healthcare. Oh? You found doctors willing to volunteer their time and pharmaceutical makers to donate their medicine free of charge? No? Oh, right, when you say free what you mean is you'll use the threat of prosecution to force someone else to pay for it.

Free mass transit? Are the busses running on good intentions? Do they drive themselves? No? Ah, you said free but what you actually meant is that you'll use the threat of prosecution to force someone else to pay the bus fare.

Free daycare? Have you found babysitters and child care professionals who are going to volunteer their time at facilities donated by philanthropists to the cause of ensuring everybody gets free time away from their toddlers? No? Ah, right, you meant using the force of government to coerce someone else into paying for that child care.

You guys are so generous to demand that everyone else pay for your moral vision of utopia to come to fruition. The tenacious selflessness you display in attempting to subjugate everyone to your personal values with the weight of society is a credit to mankind. What could possibly be more tolerant than forcing everyone to abide by your superior code of right and wrong? What could be more open minded? Nothing, I say!

Holy shit, the fact that you dems still have the audacity to call yourselves liberal is a fucking travesty.

Hope all you republicans turn down medicare when you turn 65. Hate to see you getting free stuff.

 

[The Rabbi]

You left out the Constitution, to nobody's surprise. It says there are only certain things the Fed govt can spend tax money on. Most of Bernie's programs aren't included. But he says he'll do it anyway. That turns his actions into theft, and distribution of stolen goods.
Socialists, of course, believe that government can, and should, do anything.
They are wrong on both counts.
That's why people like Sanders will get fewer votes than the local dogcatcher.

You have no idea what Sanders is about.

Socialism. aka "Theft and distribution of stolen goods", as I pointed out.

The rest pales in importance.

I would no sooner vote to put Sanders in government, than I would vote to put Al Capone in charge of guarding the vault of my local bank. And for the same reasons.

Who cares if he was going to use the money he misappropriated, to help retirees or whomever?

Again. You know nothing about his policies or what he stands for. So, you can drone on and on about socialism etc. This time, it won't work. You blew it the last time. You wasted all of that drivel on the wrong guy. A guy that is closely aligned with what you believe, I might add.

Sanders is a socialist. He is wrong on every single issue. He is wrong on trade he is wrong on climate he is wrong on wages he is wrong on the economy. He is wrong.
The only good thing about Sanders is that he makes Hillary look youthful.

 

[Flash]

I get reminded that Sanders took money from unions, PACs and "large contributors" every time I look at this spreadsheet

You mean this one?
"NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for 2009-2014 and based on Federal Election Commission data available electronically on April 06, 2015 (for Fundraising totals, Source of Funds and Total Raised vs Average) and on March 09, 2015 for Top Contributors and Industries. In the 'Source of Funds' chart, 'Large Individual Contributions' refer to all contributions from unique individuals aggregating to more than $200 within a cycle, and 'Small Individual Contributions' refer to all contributions from unique individuals totaling $200 or less within a cycle."
How many "millionaires" have donated to Bernie?
Sen. Bernie Sanders Campaign Finance Money - Summary - Senator 2014 OpenSecrets

I don't know, how many? Do you have the list?

He raised $2.6 million in that rinky dink state from large contributors as Senator. For all you know that entire contribution came from one donor.

Tom Steyer will make sure the sonofabitch is well funded as long as Sanders is spouting this AWG scam bullshit. If it looks like The Hildabest is going to self destruct Soros will funnel a shitload of money through his $3.5 billion political organizations. Of course the old standby of the filthy greedy unions will make damn sure Sanders is well funded.

 

[Disir]

You left out the Constitution, to nobody's surprise. It says there are only certain things the Fed govt can spend tax money on. Most of Bernie's programs aren't included. But he says he'll do it anyway. That turns his actions into theft, and distribution of stolen goods.
Socialists, of course, believe that government can, and should, do anything.
They are wrong on both counts.
That's why people like Sanders will get fewer votes than the local dogcatcher.

You have no idea what Sanders is about.

Socialism. aka "Theft and distribution of stolen goods", as I pointed out.

The rest pales in importance.

I would no sooner vote to put Sanders in government, than I would vote to put Al Capone in charge of guarding the vault of my local bank. And for the same reasons.

Who cares if he was going to use the money he misappropriated, to help retirees or whomever?

Again. You know nothing about his policies or what he stands for. So, you can drone on and on about socialism etc. This time, it won't work. You blew it the last time. You wasted all of that drivel on the wrong guy. A guy that is closely aligned with what you believe, I might add.

Sanders is a socialist. He is wrong on every single issue. He is wrong on trade he is wrong on climate he is wrong on wages he is wrong on the economy. He is wrong.
The only good thing about Sanders is that he makes Hillary look youthful.

Try again. Because you say so won't get it.

 

[Synthaholic]

Bernie Sanders does have my vote.

I have to ask why.

Sanders is the one that has come out fighting for Vets, working class people (blue collar), and the elderly. He doesn't lie. He doesn't bullshit people.

Who cares that he proposes to finance all his programs by stealing from people who earn more, and giving to people who earn less?

The end justifies the means, doesn't it?

If the ends are honorable and further society, then yes.

 

[Disir]

I get reminded that Sanders took money from unions, PACs and "large contributors" every time I look at this spreadsheet

You mean this one?
"NOTE: All the numbers on this page are for 2009-2014 and based on Federal Election Commission data available electronically on April 06, 2015 (for Fundraising totals, Source of Funds and Total Raised vs Average) and on March 09, 2015 for Top Contributors and Industries. In the 'Source of Funds' chart, 'Large Individual Contributions' refer to all contributions from unique individuals aggregating to more than $200 within a cycle, and 'Small Individual Contributions' refer to all contributions from unique individuals totaling $200 or less within a cycle."
How many "millionaires" have donated to Bernie?
Sen. Bernie Sanders Campaign Finance Money - Summary - Senator 2014 OpenSecrets

I don't know, how many? Do you have the list?

He raised $2.6 million in that rinky dink state from large contributors as Senator. For all you know that entire contribution came from one donor.

Tom Steyer will make sure the sonofabitch is well funded as long as Sanders is spouting this AWG scam bullshit. If it looks like The Hildabest is going to self destruct Soros will funnel a shitload of money through his $3.5 billion political organizations. Of course the old standby of the filthy greedy unions will make damn sure Sanders is well funded.

The Vermont senator who entered the 2016 race for the White House on Thursday told CNN's Wolf Blitzer in his first interview as a candidate that he'll instead look to small-dollar individual donors.

And he lambasted the growing influence that major donors like Charles and David Koch on the right and Tom Steyer on the left now have on the political process.

"Frankly, it is vulgar to me that we're having a war of billionaires," Sanders said.

Asked whether he would bless a wealthy donor's support for a pro-Sanders Super PAC, he said: "No."
Sanders doesn t want billionaires backing - CNNPolitics.com

Don't fucking lie.

 

[jasonnfree]

You left out the Constitution, to nobody's surprise. It says there are only certain things the Fed govt can spend tax money on. Most of Bernie's programs aren't included. But he says he'll do it anyway. That turns his actions into theft, and distribution of stolen goods.
Socialists, of course, believe that government can, and should, do anything.
They are wrong on both counts.
That's why people like Sanders will get fewer votes than the local dogcatcher.

You have no idea what Sanders is about.

Socialism. aka "Theft and distribution of stolen goods", as I pointed out.

The rest pales in importance.

I would no sooner vote to put Sanders in government, than I would vote to put Al Capone in charge of guarding the vault of my local bank. And for the same reasons.

Who cares if he was going to use the money he misappropriated, to help retirees or whomever?

Again. You know nothing about his policies or what he stands for. So, you can drone on and on about socialism etc. This time, it won't work. You blew it the last time. You wasted all of that drivel on the wrong guy. A guy that is closely aligned with what you believe, I might add.

Sanders is a socialist. He is wrong on every single issue. He is wrong on trade he is wrong on climate he is wrong on wages he is wrong on the economy. He is wrong.
The only good thing about Sanders is that he makes Hillary look youthful.

If there weren't any socialists america would be a third world conservative craphole. Social Security, Medicare, time and a half for over 40 hours, 40 hour work week to name a couple things. What have republicans ever given it's base besides the right to work for less? Oh forgot. Reasons to hate the poor, immigrants, and your own shadows. The party of fear, hate, and giving it's base diddly squat.

 

[dblack]

Sanders won't get nominated for the same reason Ron Paul never had a chance.

 

[Iceweasel]

So maybe a bailout was necessary to save the economy from further problems – though Detroit wasn't especially saved. Sure, jobs were still intact, and there was still money to be made there, but it didn't prevent the city's own bankruptcy. Still, keeping GM going may have prevented the city from going under even sooner.

So now that the government has decided GM is strong enough to stand on its own, you’re probably wondering if there is something you can get out of the growing automaker – since it was your money that went toward keeping it around.

The good news is yes, there is definitely an investment opportunity for you.

I won't touch a GM product. Ever. The union thugs ran it into the ground we the tax payers took it in the shorts. Fuck them and anyone milking the company dry. GM is exactly what's wrong with liberalism. The auto market would have dried up? Seriously? No one would buy a car if GM didn't make it?